Abstract
PURPOSE: Biofeedback therapy in fecal incontinence has been reported to improve continence in more than 70 percent of patients, but most studies have followed patients for less than two years. METHODS: Patients treated by biofeedback training between 1985 and 1986 were given a questionnaire in 1991, as were incontinent patients who had not entered this treatment program. All were asked for the occurrence, frequency, and severity of incontinence events in the past two weeks. Anamnestic and anorectal manometry data from the initial visit were also compared. RESULTS: Eighteen of 24 treated patients and 40 of 71 untreated patients responded. Of those treated by biofeed-back, 78 percent reported episodes of fecal incontinence as compared with 77.5 percent of those not treated by biofeedback. Severity of incontinence, however, was significantly less (P <0.02) in the treatment group (mean number of events, 0.2/day) than in those without treatment (1/day). In biofeedback-treated patients, it was identical with the frequency and severity reported immediately after therapy. No differences were found with respect to initial clinical data and anorectal manometry between both groups. CONCLUSION: Biofeedback training improves continence in patients not only during treatment and within the first two years but also for several years after therapy.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Kohlenberg JR. Operant conditioning of human anal sphincter pressure. J Appl Behav Anal 1973;6:201–8.
Enck P. Biofeedback training in disordered defecation: a critical review. Dig Dis Sci 1993;38:1953–60.
MacLeod JH. Management of anal continence by biofeedback. Gastroenterology 1987;93:291–4.
Engel BT, Nikoomanesh P, Schuster MM. Operant conditioning of rectosphincteric responses in the treatment of fecal incontinence. N Engl J Med 1974;290:646–9.
Whitehead WE, Burgio KL, Engel BT. Biofeedback treatment of fecal incontinence in geriatric patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1985;33:320–4.
Buser WD, Miner PB. Delayed rectal sensation with fecal incontinence. Successful treatment using anorectal manometry. Gastroenterology 1986;91:1186–91.
Schiller LR, Santa Ana C, Davis GR, Fordtran JS. Fecal incontinence in chronic diarrhea: report of a case with improvement after training with rectally infused saline. Gastroenterology 1979;77:751–3.
Whitehead WE, Parker L, Bosmaijan L,et al. Treatment of fecal incontinence in children with spina bifida: comparison of biofeedback and behavior modification. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1987;67:218–24.
Latimer PR, Campbell D, Kasperski J. A component analysis of biofeedback in the management of fecal incontinence. Biofeedback Self Regul 1984;9:311–24.
Miner PB, Donelly TC, Read NW. Investigation of the mode of action of biofeedback in treatment of fecal incontinence. Dig Dis Sci 1990;35:1291–8.
Whitehead WE, Engel BT, Schuster MM. Perception of rectal distension is necessary to prevent fecal incontinence. Adv Physiol Sci 1990;17:203–9.
Wald A. Biofeedback for neurogenic fecal incontinence: rectal sensation is a determinant of outcome. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1983;2;302–6.
Koletzko S, Herdmann J, Börgermann K, Theisen U, Voit T, Enck P. Evoked potentials and manometry are complementary in the evaluation of anorectal functions [abstract]. Gastroenterology 1991;100:A460.
Anonymous. Anismus and biofeedback. Lancet 1982;339:217–8.
Enck P, KrÄnzle U, Schwiese J,et al. Biofeedback-Behandlung bei Stuhlinkontinenz. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1988;113:1789–94.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by a grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, En 50/10.
About this article
Cite this article
Enck, P., Däublin, G., Lübke, H.J. et al. Long-term efficacy of biofeedback training for fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 37, 997–1001 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049311
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02049311