Abstract
Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty was used for the first time in 1980 to treat anorectal malformations. This approach includes a wide exposure, through a midline posterior incision, to determine the limits of the sphincteric mechanism and to place the rectum within its limits. This approach has been used to treat children with anorectal malformations, who underwent conventional procedures that failed. The management of anorectal malformations with this approach rendered significantly better results in terms of bowel control. However, there is still a large number of patients suffering from fecal incontinence and for them a bowel management program was designed to improve their quality of life. The posterior sagittal approach was also used for the treatment of acquired conditions including tumors, post-trauma and postradiation fistulas, and other postoperative complications. A historic review of the posterior approach disclosed that Cripps, a British surgeon, published his experience with a posterior transsphincteric approach to the rectum nine years before Kraske, a German surgeon, whose name has been traditionally associated with the leadership in this approach. Kraske actually approached the rectum through a paramedian incision and never performed a real transsphincteric incision. An experimental study done in dogs by the author demonstrated that it is not harmful to divide the sphincteric mechanism. The posterior sagittal approach represents a useful alternative to treat many pelvic conditions and, therefore, it must be a part of the armamentarium of colorectal surgeons. Finally, a series of clinical experiences convinced the author that coordinated rectosigmoid motility is the most important single factor in fecal continence and, therefore, our efforts to help patients suffering from fecal incontinence must be aimed at the manipulation of bowel motility.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Brenner EC. Congenital defects of the anus and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1915;20:579–88.
Ladd WE, Gross RE. Congenital malformations of anus and rectum. Am J Surg 1934;23:167–83.
Santulli TV. Treatment of imperforate anus and associated fistulas. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1952;95:601–14.
Stephens FD. Imperforate rectum: a new surgical technique. Med J Aust 1953;1:202–6.
Kiesewetter WB, Turner CR. Continence after surgery for imperforate anus: a critical analysis and preliminary experience with sacroperineal pull-through. Ann Surg 1963;158:498–512.
Louw JH, Cywes S, Cremin BJ. The management of anorectal agenesis. S Afr J Surg 1971;9:21–30.
Soave F. Surgery of rectal anomalies with presentation of the relationship between the colonic muscular sleeve and the puborectalis muscle. J Pediatr Surg 1969;4:705–12.
Nixon HH, Puri P. The results of treatment of anorectal anomalies: a thirteen to twenty year followup. J Pediatr Surg 1977;12:27–37.
DeVries PA, Peña A. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. J Pediatr Surg 1982;5:638–43.
Peña A, DeVries PA. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty: important technical considerations and new applications. J Pediatr Surg 1982;6:796–811.
Peña A. Surgical management of anorectal malformations: a unified concept. Pediatr Surg Int 1988;3:82–93.
Peña A. The surgical management of persistent cloaca; results in 54 patients treated with a posterior sagittal approach. J Pediatr Surg 1989;24:590–8.
Peña A. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty; result in the management of 332 cases of anorectal malformation. Pediatr Surg Int 1988;3:94–104.
Peña A. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty as a secondary operation for the treatment of fecal incontinence. J Pediatr Surg 1983;18:762–73.
Peña A, El-Behery M. Megasigmoid as source of pseudo-incontinence in children with repaired anorectal malformations. J Pediatr Surg 1993, 28:1–5.
Peña A, Bonilla E, Mendez M, Sanchez L. The posterior sagittal approach; further pediatric applications. Pediatr Surg Int 1992;7:274–8.
Peña A, Filmer B, Bonilla E, Mendez M, Stollar C. Trans-anorectal approach for the treatment of urogenital sinus; preliminary report. J Pediatr Surg 1992;27:681–5.
Kraske P. Zur, estirpation, hochsitzender, mastdarmkrebese. Verh Dtsch Ges Chir 1885;14:464–74.
Cripps H. Cancer of the rectum; its surgical treatment with an appendix of 380 cases. Jacksonian Prize Essay. 5th ed. London: Churchill, 1907:117–44.
Bevan A. Carcinoma of the rectum; treatment by local excision. Surg Clin Chicago 1917;1:1233–9.
Mason AY. Surgical axis to the rectum—a trans-sphincteric exposure. J R Soc Med 1970;63:191–4.
Mason AY. Trans-sphincteric exposure of the rectum. Ann Rect Coll Surg Engl 1972;51:320–31.
Mason AY. Trans-sphincteric approach to rectal lesions. Surg Annu 1977;9:177–94.
Peña A, Amroch D, Rodriguez G, Csury L. The effects of the posterior sagittal approach on rectal function (experimental study). J Pediatr Surg 1993;28:733–8.
Pickrell KL, Georgard N, Crawford H,et al. Construction of a rectal sphincter restoration of anal incontinence by transplanting the gracilis muscle. Ann Surg 1952;135:853–62.
Skef Z, Radhakrishnan J, Reyes HM. Anorectal continency following sphincter reconstruction utilizing the gluteus maximus muscle. A case report. J Pediatr Surg 1983;18:779–81.
Iwai N, Kaneta H, Pseuto T,et al. Objective assessment of anorectal function after sphincter reconstruction using the gluteus maximus muscle. Report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:973–7.
Yuli C, Xucheng Z. Reconstruction of rectal sphincter by transposition of gluteus muscle for fecal incontinence. J Pediatr Surg 1987;22:62–4.
Hakelius L. Free autogenous muscle transplantation in two cases of total anal incontinence. Acta Chir Scand 1975;141:69–75.
Hakelius L, Gierup J, Grott G,et al. Further experience with free autogenous muscle transplantation in children for anal incontinence. Z Kinderchir 1980;31:141–7.
Kottmeier PK, Dziadiw R. The complete release of the levator sling in fecal incontinence. J Pediatr Surg 1967;2:111–7.
Holschneider AM, Hecker M. Reverse smooth muscle plasty. A new method of treating anorectal incontinence in infants with high anal rectal atresia. J Pediatr Surg 1981;16:917–20.
Holschneider AM, Hecker WC. Smooth muscle reverse plasty. A new method to treat anorectal incontinence in infants with high anal and rectal atresia. Results after gracilis plasty and free muscle transplantation. Prog Pediatr Surg 1984;17:131–45.
Horn HR, Schoetz DJ, Coller JA, Veidenhermer MC. Sphincter repair with a silastic sling for anal incontinency and rectal procidentia. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;28:868–72.
Schoning GV, Zuhilke H, Langpem L. Animal experiment studies on the treatment of fecal incontinence by means of artificial sphincter. Zentralbl Chir 1976;9:180.
Sofia CA, Rush BF, Kozil J,et al. Experiences with an artificial sphincter to establish anal continence in dogs. Am Surg 1988;54:390–4.
Szinicz GA. New implantable sphincter prosthesis for artificial anus. Int J Artif Organs 1980;3:358–62.
Christiansen J, Lorentzen M. Implantation of artificial sphincter for anal incontinence. Lancet 1987;2:244–5.
Hopkinson BR, Lightwood R. Electrical treatment of incontinence. Br J Surg 1967;54:802–5.
Dickson JA, Nixon HH. Controlled by electronic stimulator of incontinence after operation for anorectal agenesis. J Pediatr Surg 1968;3:696–701.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Read at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Francisco, California, June 7 to 12, 1992.
About this article
Cite this article
Peña, A. The posterior sagittal approach: Implications in adult colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 37, 1–11 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047206
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02047206