Abstract
Fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) are able to detect conspecific alarm pheromone in the feces of northern pike (Esox lucius) and have been shown to avoid areas labeled with the feces of pike that were fed minnows. The minnows did not avoid areas labeled with the feces of pike that were fed swordtails (Xiphophorous helleri), which lack ostariophysan alarm pheromone. In laboratory experiments, pike fed a diet of minnows localized their defecation away from their foraging area. It has been suggested that in doing so, pike may remove chemical cues that label their foraging area as dangerous to prey species. As yet there has been no conclusive evidence to support this hypothesis. In this experiment, we test the effects of different predator diets on localized defecation by pike. Pike were fed minnows, swordtails, or mice (Mus musculus). Swordtails and mice lack ostariophysan alarm pheromones. Area use and location of feces were recorded. Pike fed minnows spent significantly more time in the home area (i.e., area of the test tank where they were fed) and defecated significantly more often in the opposite end of the tank. Pike fed swordtails also exhibited a significant preference for the home area in area use, while those fed mice showed no such preference. When fed either swordtails or mice, there was no significant difference between the proportion of time spent and proportion of feces in each area of the test tank. These data suggest that pike localize their defecation only when consuming prey items containing alarm pheromone. The current findings support the hypothesis that pike localize their defecation to remove chemical cues from the foraging area of the home range in order to avoid chemically labeling their foraging area as dangerous to prey.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Brown, G. E., Chivers, D. P., andSmith, R. J. F. 1995a. Localized defecation by pike: A response to labelling by cyprinid alarm pheromone?Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 36:105–110.
Brown, G. E., Chivers, D. P., andSmith, R. J. F. 1995b. Fathead minnows avoid conspecific and heterospecific alarm pheromone in the faeces of northern pike.J. Fish Biol. 47:387–393.
Chapman, C. A., andMacKay, W. C. 1984. Direct observation of habitat utilization of northern pike.Copeia 1984:255–258.
Chivers, D. P., andSmith, R. J. F. 1994. Intra- and interspecific avoidance of areas marked with skin extract from brook sticklebacks (Culea inconstans) in a natural habitat.J. Chem. Ecol. 19:623–633.
Chivers, D. P., andSmith, R. J. F. 1995a. Fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) learn to recognize chemical stimuli from high risk habitats by the presence of alarm substance.Behav. Ecol. 6:155–158.
Chivers, D. P., andSmith, R. J. F. 1995b. Chemical recognition of risky habitats is culturally transmitted among fathead minnows,Pimephales promelas (Osteichthyes, Cyprinidae).Ethology 99:286–296.
Chivers, D. P., Brown, G. E., andSmith, R. J. F. 1995a. Acquired recognition of chemical stimuli from pike,Esox lucius, by brook sticklebacks,Culaea inconstans (Osteichthyes, Gasterosteidae).Ethology 99:234–242.
Chivers, D. P., Wisenden, B. D., andSmith, R. J. F. 1995b. The role of experience in the response of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) to skin extract of Iowa darters (Etheostoma exile).Behaviour. In press.
Heczko, E., andSeghers, B. H. 1981. Effects of alarm substance on schooling in the common shiner (Notropis conrnutus, Cyprinidae).Environ. Biol. Fish. 6:25–29.
Hobson, E. S. 1979. Interactions between piscivourous fishes and their prey, pp. 231–242,in H. Clepper and R. H. Strout (eds.). Predator-Prey Systems in Fisheries Management. Sport Fishing Institute, Washington, D.C.
Huntingford, F. A. 1984. Some ethical issues raised by studies of predation and aggression.Anim. Behav. 32:210–215.
Keppel, G. 1982. Design and Analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
Krause, J. 1993. The effect of ‘Schreckstoff’ on the shoaling behaviour of the minnow: A test of Hamilton's selfish herd theory.Anim. Behav. 45:1019–1024.
Lawrence, B. J., andSmith, R. J. F. 1989. Behavioral response of solitary fathead minnows,Pimephales promelas, to alarm substance.J. Chem. Ecol. 15:209–219.
Lawler, G. H. 1965. The food of the pike,Esox lucius, in Heming Lake, Manitoba.J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 22:1357–1377.
Mathis, A., andSmith, R. J. F. 1993a. Fathead minnows,Pimephales promelas, learn to recognize northern pike,Esox lucius, as predators on the basis of chemical stimuli from minnows in the pike's diet.Anim. Behav. 46:645–656.
Mathis, A., andSmith, R. J. F. 1993b. Chemical labeling of northern pike (Esox lucius) by the alarm pheromone of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas).J. Chem. Ecol. 19:1967–1979.
Mathis, A., andSmith, R. J. F. 1993c. Chemical alarm signals increase the survival time of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) during encounters with northern pike (Esox lucius).Behav. Ecol. 4:260–265.
Mathis, A., andSmith, R. J. F. 1993d. Intraspecific and cross-superorder responses to chemical alarm signals by brook sticklebacks.Ecology 74:2395–2404.
Mathis, A., Chivers, D. P., andSmith, R. J. F. 1995. Chemical alarm signals: Predator-deterrence or predator-attractants?Am. Nat. 145:994–1005.
Poole, T. 1985. Social Behaviour in Mammals. Blackie, Glascow.
Pfeiffer, W. 1977. The distribution of fright reaction and alarm substance cells in fishes.Copeia 4:653–665.
Rottman, S. J., andSnowdon, C. T. 1972. Demonstration and analysis of an alarm pheromone in mice.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 81:483–490.
Savino, J. F., andStein, R. A. 1989. Behavior of fish predators and their prey: Habitat choice between open water and dense vegetation.Environ. Biol. Fish. 24:287–293.
Scott, W. B., andCrossman, E. J. 1973. Freshwater fishes of Canada.Can. Bull. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 184:966 pp.
Smith, R. J. F. 1973. Testosterone eliminates alarm substance cells in male fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas).Can. J. Zool. 51:875–876.
Smith, R. J. F. 1976. Seasonal loss of alarm substance cells in North American cyprinoid fishes and its relation to abrasive spawning behaviour.Can. J. Zool. 54:1172–1182.
Smith, R. J. F. 1982. Reaction ofPercina nigrofaciata, Ammocrypta beani, andEtheostoma swaini (Percidae, Pisces) to conspecific and intergeneric skin extracts.Can. J. Zool. 60:1067–1072.
Smith, R. J. F. 1986. The evolution of chemical alarm signals in fishes, pp. 99–115,in D. Duvall, D. Müller-Schwarze, and R. M. Silverstein (eds.). Chemical Signals in Vertebrates, Vol. IV. Plenum, New York.
Smith, R. J. F. 1992. Alarm signals in fishes.Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 2:33–63.
Smith, R. J. F., Lawrence, B. J., andSmith, M. J. 1991. Cross-reactions to skin extracts between two gobies,Asterropteryx semipunctatus andBrachygobius sabanus.J. Chem. Ecol. 17:2253–2259.
Sokal, R. J., andRohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Wisenden, B. D., Chivers, D. P., andSmith, R. J. F. 1994. Risk-sensitive habitat use by brook stickleback (Culaea inconstans) in areas associated with minnow alarm pheromone.J. Chem. Ecol. 20:2695–2703.
Wisenden, B. D., Chivers, D. P., Brown, G. E., andSmith, R. J. F. 1995. The role of experience in risk assessment: Avoidance of areas chemically labelled with fathead minnow alarm pheromone by conspecifics and heterospecifics.Ecoscience 2:116–122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, G.E., Chivers, D.P. & Smith, R.J.F. Effects of diet on localized defecation by Northern Pike,Esox lucius . J Chem Ecol 22, 467–475 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033649
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033649