Abstract
An ongoing research project with a large international manufacturing company has uncovered many critical issues for the development and introduction of systems that supportconcurrent engineering. Several of these issues can be solved through careful interface design, while others require significant technical and organizational changes. To reduce training costs and support a broad spectrum of users, computer system developers must create a single system image, giving the users the impression that they are accessing a single database through a consistent and easy to use interface. This interface, and the tools it contains, may be used to support concurrent engineering activities even when a company is geographically distributed over a large area. The complexity of the firm's products and processes and the need for rapid access to relevant performance information make it essential that developers identify suitable frameworks for organizing database queries.Design hierarchies, representations of the structure and function of the firm's products and processes, have proven to be powerful tools for effective query management, and for efficient navigation through the database. The database interface must also produce integrated displays of data drawn from a number of sources in response to prestructured queries. Beyond these interface design issues, there are a number of technical and organizational barriers to the implementation of large-scale engineering systems. In particular, the existence of many incompatible databases in different parts of an organization makes the introduction of a new, uniform system very difficult. Organizational issues also play a major role in achieving, or hindering, the implementation of new computer systems. This paper describes some of the technical innovations, and the motivations behind them, from one particular engineering design system. It also discusses the reactions of engineers and management, and explains why management may oppose innovation even when engineers enthusiastically support it.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Clark, K. B. The interaction of design hierarchies and market concepts in technological evolution.Research Policy 14, 1985, 235–251
Clark, K. B., W. B. Chew, and T. Fujimoto. Product development in the world auto industry.Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3, 1897, 729–771
Clark, K. B. and T. Fujimoto. Overlapping problem solving in product development. Harvard Business School Working Paper 87-049, 1987
Clark, K. B. and T. Fujimoto. Lead time in automobile product development: explaining the Japanese advantage. Harvard Business School Working Paper 89-033, 1989
Cutkosky, M. and J. Tenenbaum. A methodology and computational framework for concurrent product and process design.Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 24 1989
Dussalt, H. B. The evolution and practical application of failure modes and effects analysis. RADC-TR-33-72, In-House Report of the Rome Air Development Center, March 1983
Friel, P., R. Mayer, J. Lockledge, G. Smith, and R. Schulze. Coolsys: a cooling systems design assistant. In H. Schorr and A. Rappaport (eds.),Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Menlo Park: AAAI Press, 1989, 203–212
Hauser, J. and D. Clausing. The house of quality.Harvard Business Review, May–June 1988, 63–73
Hutchins, E., J. Hollan, and D. Norman. Direct manipulation interfaces. In D. Norman and S. Draper (eds.),User Centered System Design Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates, 1986, 87–124
Jaikumar, R. and R. Bohn. The development of intelligent systems for industrial use: a conceptual framework. Harvard Business School working paper 9-786-024, 1986
Kilhoffer, A. and K. Kempf. Designing for manufacturability in riveted joints.Proceedings of AAAI-86 Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1986, 820–824
Leonard-Barton, D. Implementation characteristics of organizational innovations: limits and opportunities for management strategies.Communications Research 15:5, 1988, 603–631
Mittal, S. and A. Araya. A knowledge-based framework for design.Proceedings of AAAI-86 Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1986, 856–865
Nau, D. S. Hierarchical abstraction for process planning.Second International Conference on Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 1987
Rouse, W. B. Intelligent decision support for advance manufacturing systems.Proceedings of Manufacturing International, Vol. II, ASME, 1988
Rychener, M., I. Hulthage, M. Fox, and M. Farinacci. Integration of multiple knowledge sources in ALADIN, an alloy design system.Proceedings of AAAI-86 Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1986, 878–882
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salzberg, S., Watkins, M. Managing information for concurrent engineering: Challenges and barriers. Research in Engineering Design 2, 35–52 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02029820
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02029820