Abstract
The citation rates of scientific papers, long used by numerous sociologists of science to measure the influence of individual scientists and the diffusion of knowledge, are shown to be partly affected by the various structural characteristics of these papers. Based on an analysis of 221 scientific papers in three cocitation clusters, between 15 and 35 percent of the variation in citation rates is found to be a function of those papers' textual and nontextual characteristics. The citation rates of papers in the Burkitts-Lymphoma and Heavy Quark Potential clusters are shown to be heavily dependent on abstract characteristics such as readability and number of uncommon words. The citation rates of DNA cluster papers are observed to be significantly affected by both the number of references and figures found in teh body of those papers. Of particular note is the fact that while the readability of abstracts is shown to decrease the citation rates of Burkitts-Lymphoma papers, the opposite is true of Heavy Quark Potential papers.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Barnes, B.,Interest and the Growth of Knowledge, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1977.
Bazerman, C., Physicists reading physics,Written Communication, 2 (1985) 3–23.
Cole, J.S., Cole, S.,Social Stratification in Science, Chicago, University of Chicago Press 1973.
Edge, D., Quantitative measures of communication in science: A critical review,History of Science, 17 (1979) 102–34.
Garfield, E., The awards of science: Beyond the Nobel Prize Part 1. The determinants of prestige, 17–26 in:Garfield, E.,Essays of an Information Scientist, Philadelphia, PA; ISI Press, 1983.
Gordon, D.B., Sager, N. A method of measuring information in language, applied to medical texts,Information Processing and Management, 21 (1985) 269–289.
Gouldner, A.,The Future of Intellectuals and the Rise of the New Class, New York, Seabury Press, 1979.
Hargens, L., N.C. Mullins, P.K. Hecht, Research areas and stratification processes in science,Social Studies of Science, 10 (1980) 55–74.
Institute for Scientific Information,Science Citation Index, Philadelphia, ISI Press, serial.
Irvine, J., B.R. Martin,Foresight in Science: Picking the Winners, London, Frances Pinter, 1984.
Irvine, J., B.R. Martin, Basic research in the East and in the West: A comparison of the scientific performance of high energy physics accelerators,Social Studies of Science, 15 (1985) 293–341.
ISI Atlas of Science:Biotechnology and Molecular Genetics 1981/82. Philadelphia, Institute for Scientific Information, 1984.
Laudan, L.,Progress and Its Problems, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press, 1977.
MacKenzie, D. Statistics in Britain, 1865–1930, Edinburgh, Scotland, Edinburgh University Press, 1981.
MacRoberts, M.H., B.R. MacRoberts, Quantitative measures of communication in science: A short study at the formal level,Social Studies of Science, 16 (1986) 151–72.
Manuel, F.E.,A Portrait of Isaac Newton, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1968.
Martin, B.R., J. Irvine, Evaluating the evaluators: a reply to our critics,Social Studies of Science, 10 (1985) 558–75.
Merton, R.K.,The Sociology of Science, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973.
Moravcsik, M.J., P. Murugesan, Some results on the function and quality of citations,Social Studies of Science, 5 (1975) 86–92.
Murugesan, P., M.J. Moravcsik, Variation of the nature of citation measures with journals and scientific specialities,Journal of the American Society for Information Science, (May, 1978) 141–7.
Nagel, E.,The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1961.
Price, D.J. de Solla,Little Science, Big Science, New York, Columbia University Press, 1963.
Rowlett, R.J., Jr., Abstracts and other information filters,Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 25 (1985) 159–163.
Sager, J.C., D. Dungworth, P.F. McDonald,English Special Languages: Principles and Practice in Science and Technology, Wiesbaden, Oscar Brandstetter Verlag KG, 1980.
Skolnik, H. Historical development of abstracting,Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences, 19 (1979) 215–218.
Small, H.G. Cited documents as concept symbols,Social Studies of Science, 8 (1978) 327–40.
Small, H., E. Garfield, The Geography of Science: Disciplinary and National Mappings, 11 (1985) 147–159.
Steed, J., N.C. Mullins, Problems and Moves: A Methodology. Paper presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science meeting, Philadelphia, May 23, 1986.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dedicated to the memory of Michael J. Moravcsik
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Snizek, W.E., Oehler, K. & Mullins, N.C. Textual and nontextual characteristics of scientific papers: Neglected science indicators. Scientometrics 20, 25–35 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018141
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018141