Abstract
No new arguments or evidence that undermine our conviction that available scientometric measures do not indicate a statistically significant “decline” of British science in the first half of the eighties have been found inMartin's reply.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
B.R. Martin,Scientometrics, 20 (1991) 000
T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert,Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 165
Scientometric Datafiles, 1980–1989, in preparation
J. Irvine, B.R. Martin,Nature, 323 (1986) 591
A. Schubert, W. Glänzel, T. Braun,Scientometrics, 16 (1989) 3
T. Braun, W. Glänzel, A. Schubert,Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 325
A. Schubert, W. Glänzel, T. Braun,Scientometrics, 18 (1990) 173
B.R. Martin, J. Irvine, F. Narin, C. Sterritt, K.A. Stevens,Science and Public Policy 17 (1990) 14
T. Braun, A. Schubert,Nature, 345 (1990) 286
T. Braun, A. Schubert, S. Zsindely,Analytical Proceedings, 23 (1989) 87
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Braun, T., Glänzel, W. & Schubert, A. The bibliometric assessment of UK scientific performance—Some comments on Martin's “reply”. Scientometrics 20, 359–362 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017525
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017525