Abstract
An evaluation was made of the use of bibliometric indicators for five disciplines in the humanities (social history, general linguistics, general literature, Dutch literature, and Dutch language) and three disciplines in the social and behavioural sciences (experimental psychology, anthropology, and public administration) in the Netherlands. Articles in journals were the predominant outlet in all disciplines. Monographs and popularizing articles were more important outlets in ‘softer’ fields than in ‘harder’ ones. The enlightenment function of scholarship was especially evident in Dutch literature and language, and public administration. Only some of the humanities disciplines are locally oriented. Although many publications were written in English, only experimental psychology, general linguistics, anthropology, and genrral literature were internationally oriented regarding output media. The impact of departments differed greatly both within and between disciplines. For all disciplines, bibliometric indicators are potentially useful for monitoring international impact, as expert interviews confirmed. Especially in Dutch language, Dutch literature and public administration, ISI-citation data are not very useful for monitoring national impact.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
R. N. BROADUS, The literature of the social sciences: a survey of citation studies,International Social Sciences Journal, 23 (1971) 236–243.
J. R. COLE, S. COLE,Social Stratification in Science, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973.
S. COLE, The hierarchy of the sciences?American Journal of Sociology, 89 (1983) 111–139.
S. E. COZZENS, Using the archive: Derek Price's theory of differences among the sciences,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 431–441.
C. O. FROST, The use of citations in literary research,Library Quarterly, 49 (1979) 399–414.
E. GARFIELD,Citation Indexing, New York, Wiley-Interscience, 1979.
E. GARFIELD, Is information retrieval in the arts and humanities inherently different from that in science?Library Quarterly, 50 (1980) No. 1, 40–57.
E. GARFIELD, Data from the Arts & Humanities Citation Index reveal the interrelationships of science and the humanities,Current Comments, 46 (1982) 758–760.
E. GARFIELD, The 250 most-cited authors in the arts & Humanities Citation Index, 1976–1983,Current Comments, 48 (1986) 3–10.
R. HEINZKILL, Characteristics of references in selected scholarly English literary journals,Library Quarterly, 50 (1980) 352–365.
H. F. MOED, W. J. M. BURGER, J. G. FRANKFORT, A. F. J. Van RAAN, The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance,Research Policy, 14 (1985) 131–149.
A. J. NEDERHOF, Evaluating research output through life work citation counts,Scientometrics, 7 (1985) 23–28.
A. J. NEDERHOF, A. F. J. Van RAAN, Peer review and bibliometric indicators of scientific performance: A comparison of cum laude and ordinary doctorates in physics,Scientometrics, 11 (1987) 329–346 (a).
A. J. NEDERHOF, A. F. J. Van RAAN, A validation study of bibliometric indicators: the comparative performance of cum laude doctorates in chemistry. Paper presented at 12th meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, at Worchester (MA), USA, November 19–22, 1987 (b).
A. J. NEDERHOF, A. F. J. Van RAAN, Citation theory and the Ortega hypothesis,Scientometrics, 12 (1987) 325–328 (c).
A. J. NEDERHOF, Books and chapters are not to be neglected in measuring research productivity,American Psychologist, in press.
D. De S. PRICE, Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience, In: C. E. NELSON, D. POLLACK (Eds),Communication among scientists and engineers, Lexington, Mass., Lexington books, 1970.
H. G. SMALL, D. CRANE, Specialties and disciplines in science and social science: an examination of their structure using citation indexes,Scientometrics, 1 (1979) 445–461.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nederhof, A.J., Zwaan, R.A., De Bruin, R.E. et al. Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social and beha vioural sciences: A comparative study. Scientometrics 15, 423–435 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017063
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017063