Abstract
Human clinical streptococcal isolates can be identified rapidly by means of commercially available miniaturized biochemical systems, in contrast to animal and environmental isolates which may require extensive characterization using conventional methods. Streptococcal isolates (n=548) from fresh animal feces of cattle, swine, and broiler chickens were tested by means of conventional biochemical and physiological techniques, and also with a miniaturized technique in which conventional formulations were dispensed in 0.1 ml volume into microtiter plates. Agreement of the positive feature frequencies of the two methods were compared. Results from the tolerance tests in the two methods were generally in good agreement. However, the miniaturized method tended to give false negative results in some carbohydrate fermentation tests. Agreement between the 2 methods ranged from 100% for bile esculin tests to 71% for raffinose fermentation. Cluster analysis of the conventional method data indicated that there were 11 biochemically related groups of isolates, 2 of which were identified asStreptococcus faecalis, andS. morbillorum. Half of the isolates biochemically resembledS. faecium. Errors of miniaturized tests occurred mainly in certain tests and in certain biochemically related clusters of isolates. The data indicate that further investigation of experimental conditions such as medium formulation and inoculum size could lead to a successful miniaturized technique for testing animal streptococcal isolates.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Carlsson J (1967) Presence of various types of nonhaemolytic streptococci in dental plaque and in other sites of the oral cavity in man. Odont Revy 18:55–74
Facklam RR (1977) Isolation and identification of streptococci. III. Presumptive identification of streptococci by nonserological methods. US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Atlanta
Facklam RR (1972) Recognition of group D streptococcal species of human origin by biochemical and physiological tests. Appl Microbiol 23:1131–1139
Facklam RR, Padula JF, Thacker LG, Wortham EC, Sconyers BJ (1974) Presumptive identification of group A, B, and D streptococci. Appl Microbiol 27:107–113
Facklam RR, Moody MD (1980) Presumptive identification of group D streptococci: the bileesculin test. Appl Microbiol 20:245–250
Fuller R, Newland LGM, Briggs CAE, Braude R, Mitchell KG (1960) The normal intestinal flora of the pig. IV. The effect of dietary supplements of penicillin, chlorotetracycline, or copper sulfate on fecal flora. J Appl Bacteriol 23:195–203
Gross KC, Houghton MP, Senterfit LB (1975) Presumptive speciation ofStreptococcus bovis and other group D streptococci from human sources by using arginine and pyruvate tests. J Clin Microbiol 1:54–60
Gunsalus IC, Sherman JM (1943) The fermentation of glycerol by streptococci. J Bacteriol 45:155–162
Janye-Williams DJ (1976) The application of miniaturized methods for the characterization of various organisms isolated from the animal gut. J Appl Bacteriol 40:189–200
Johnson R (1979) Computer-aided identification. FDA By-Lines 9:235–250
Jones D, Sackin MJ, Sneath PHA (1972) A numerical taxonomic study of streptococci of serological group D. J Gen Microbiol 72:439–450
Lennette EH, Spaulding EJ, Truant JP (eds) (1974) Manual of clinical microbiology, 2nd ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC
Medrek TF, Barnes EM (1962) The distribution of group D streptococci in cattle and sheep. J Appl Bact 25:159–168
Mundt JO (1975) Unidentified streptococci from plants. Int J Syst Bacteriol 25:281–285
Mundt JO (1976) Streptococci in dried and frozen foods. J Milk Tech 39:413–416
Ramadan FM, Sabir MS (1963) Differentiation studies of fecal streptococci from farm animals. Can J Microbiol 9:443–450
Vera HD, Dumoff M (1975) Culture media. In: Lennette EH, Spaulding EJ, Truant JP (eds) Manual of clinical microbiology, 2nd ed. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, p 893
Waitkins SA, Ball LC, Fraser CA (1980) Use of the API-ZYM system in rapid identification of alpha and nonhaemolytic streptococci. J Clin Pathol 33:53–57
Walczak CA, Krichevsky MI (1982) Computer-aided selection of efficient identification features and calculation of group descriptors as exemplified by data onCapnocytophaga species. Curr Microbiol 7:199–204
Walczak CA, Krichevsky MI (1982) Computer-aided comparison of laboratories and/or methods characterizing the same strains. Abstr Annu Meet ASM 1982. No. 184, p 108
Walczak CA, Krichevsky MI (1980) Computer methods for describing groups from binary phenetic data: modification of numerical taxonomy programs to increase flexibility. Int J Syst Bacteriol 30:622–626
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Molitoris, E., McKinley, G., Krichevsky, M.I. et al. Comparison of conventional and miniaturized biochemical techniques for identification of animal streptococcal isolates. Microb Ecol 11, 81–90 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02015111
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02015111