Abstract
The imaging techniques for diagnosis and monitoring of reduction of intussusception by fluoroscopy and ultrasound continue to evolve. The common goal of all protocols is to reduce the intussusception by enema in as many patients as possible and avoid laparotomy with its potential morbidity. We report two infants in whom the initial attempt at reduction by air enema only achieved partial reduction, from the descending colon to the transverse colon in one, and from the splenic flexure to the caecum in the other. Both patients became asymptomatic and clinically stable. In light of the clinical stability, and in consultation with the surgeons, laparotomy was deferred. Sonography was used to confirm the persistence of the intussusception before repeat air enema several hours later. Following three further air enemas in each child, the intussusceptions were successfully reduced after 20 h and 24 h respectively. Both patients remained asymptomatic and did not require surgery. In infants with partially reduced intussusception we suggest that if the patient becomes asymptomatic and stable, surgery can be safely delayed to permit further attempts at enema reduction. Sonography has a valuable role in determining the persistence of the intussusception prior to repeat enema. Close cooperation with the surgeon and careful clinical monitoring of the patient are essential requirements for this proposal.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Riebel TW, Nasir R, Weber K (1993) Ultrasound guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception in children. Radiology 188: 513–516
Todani T, Sato Y, Watanabe Y et al (1990) Air reduction for intussusception in infancy and childhood: ultrasonographic diagnosis and management without X-ray exposure. Z Kinderchir 45: 222–226
Stein M, Alton DJ, Daneman A (1992) Pneumatic reductions of intussusception: 5 year experience. Radiology 183: 681–684
Gu L, Alton DJ, Daneman A et al (1988) Intussusception reduction in children by rectal insufflation of air. AJR 150: 1345–1348
Guo J, Ma X, Zhou Q (1986) Results of air pressure enema reduction of intussusception: 6396 cases of 13 years. J Pediatr Surg 21: 1201–1203
Courtney D, Kelleher J, O'Donnell B (1981) Intussusception—a change in policy where management has been satisfactory. Int J Med Sci 150: 69–72
Liu KW, MacCarthy J, Guiney EJ, Fitzgerald RJ (1986) Intussusception—current trends in management. Arch Dis Child 61: 75–77
Collins DL, Pickney LE, Miller KE, et al (1989) Hydrostatic reduction of ileocolic intussusception: a second attempt in the operating room with general anesthesia. J Pediatr 115: 204–207
Stringer MD, Pablot SM, Brereton RJ (1992) Paediatric intussusception. Br J Surg 79: 867–876
Ein SH, Palder SB, Alton DJ, Daneman A (1994) Intussusception: toward less surgery? J Pediatr Surg 29: 433–435
Ravitch MM (1986) Intussusception. In: Welch KJ, Radolf JG, Ravitch MM, O'Neill JA Jr, Rowe MI (eds) Pediatric Surgery. Year Book, Chicago, pp 868–882
Janick JS, Ein SH, Filler RM, et al (1981) An assessment of surgical treatment of adhesive small bowel obstruction in infants and children. J Pediatr Surg 16: 225–229
Ein SH, Alton DJ, Palder SB, Shandling B, Stinger D (1995) Intussusception in the 90's. Have 25 years made a difference? (Submitted J Ped Surg)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Connolly, B., Alton, D.J., Ein, S.H. et al. Partially reduced intussusception: When are repeated delayed reduction attempts appropriate?. Pediatr Radiol 25, 104–107 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02010317
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02010317