Abstract
Receptive females of the bushcricketRequena sp. 5 (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) are attracted to male calls. In this experiment we investigate whether females discriminate between males on the basis of their calls. When virgin females were presented with two males of different size, they preferred the larger male. Larger males produce calls with a lower carrier frequency compared to smaller males, suggesting that females may use male carrier frequency as a predictor of male size. Furthermore, larger males produce heavier spermatophores. This suggests that females may prefer to mate with larger males to receive large nuptial gifts.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arak, A. (1983). Sexual selection through male-male competition in natterjack toad choruses.Nature 306: 261–262.
Arak, A. (1988). Female mate selection in the natterjack toad: Active choice or passive attraction.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22: 317–327.
Arak, A., Eiríksson, T., and Radesäter, T. (1990). The adaptive significance of acoustic spacing in male bushcricketsTettigonia viridissima: A perturbation experiment.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26: 1–7.
Bailey, W. J. (1985). Acoustic cues for female choice in bushcrickets (Tettigoniidae). In Kalmring, K., and Elsner, N. (eds.),Acoustic Cues and Vibrational Communication in Insects. Paul Pary, Berlin, pp. 101–110.
Bailey, W. J., Cunningham, R. J., and Lebel, L. (1990). Song power, spectral distribution and female phonotaxis in the bushcricketRequena verticalis (Tettigoniidae: Orthoptera): Active female choice or passive attraction.Anim. Behav. 40: 33–42.
Bailey, W. J., and Thiele, D. (1983). Male specing behaviour in the Tettigoniidae: An experimental approach. In Gwynne, D. T., and Morris, G. K. (eds.),Orthopteran Mating Systems: Sexual Competition in a Diverse Group of Insects, Boulder, CO, pp. 163–184.
Bailey, W. J., and Yeoh, P. B. (1989). Female phonotaxis and frequency discrimination in the bushcricketRequena verticalis (Tettigoniidae: Listrocelidinae).J. Physiol. Entomol. 13: 363–372.
Borgia, G. (1980). Sexual competition inScatophaga stercoraria: Size- and density related changes in male ability to capture females.Behaviour 75: 185–206.
Crankshaw, O. S. (1979). Female choice in relation to calling and courtship songs inAcheta domesticus.Anim. Behav. 27: 1274–1275.
Fisher, R. A. (1930).The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Forrest, T. G. (1983). Calling song and mate choice in mole crickets. In Gwynne, D. T., and Morris, G. K. (eds.),Orthopteran Mating Systems: Competition in a Diverse Group of Insects, Boulder, CO, pp. 185–204.
Gilburn, A. S., Foster, S. P., and Day, T. H. (1992). Female mating preferences for large size.Heredity 69: 209–216.
Grafen, A. (1990). Biological signals as handicaps.J. Theoret. Biol. 144: 517–546.
Greenfield, M. D., and Roizen, I. (1993). Katydid synchronous chorusing is an evolutionary stable outcome of female choice.Nature 364: 618–620.
Gwynne, D. T. (1982). Mate selection by female katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae,Conocephalus nigropleurum).Anim. Behav. 30: 734–738.
Gwynne, D. T. (1984). Courtship feeding increases female reproductive success in bushcrickets.Nature 307: 361–363.
Gwynne, D. T. (1988). Courtship feeding and the fitness of female katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae).Evolution 42: 545–555.
Gwynne, D. T., and Bailey, W. J. (1988). Mating system, mate choice and ultrasonic calling in a zaprochiline katydid (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae).Behaviour 105: 202–223.
Gwynne, D. T., Brown, B. J., and Codd, C. G. (1984). The function of the katydid spermatophore and its role in fecundity and insemination (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae).Aust. J. Zool. 32: 15–22.
Hedrick, A. V. (1986). Female preferences for calling bout duration in a field cricket.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19: 73–77.
Iwasa, Y., Pomiankowski, A., and Nee, S. (1991). The evolution of costly mate preferences. II. The “handicap” principle.Evolution 45: 1431–1442.
Latimer, W. (1981). Variation in the song of the bushcricketPlatycleis albopunctata (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae).J. Nat. Hist. 15: 245–263.
Latimer, W., and Schatral, A. (1986). Information cues used in male competition byTettigonia cantans (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae).Anim. Behav. 34: 162–168.
Latimer, W., and Sippel, M. (1987). Acoustic cues for female choice and male competition inTettigonia cantans.Anim. Behav. 35: 887–900.
Maynard Smith, J. (1991). Theories of sexual selection.Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 146–151.
Morris, G. K., Kerr, G. K., and Fullard, J. H. (1978). Phonotactic preferences of female meadow katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae.Conocephalus nigropleurum).Can. J. Zool. 102: 1479–1487.
Parker, G. A. (1982). Phenotype limited evolutionary stable strategy. In King's College Sociobiology Group (eds.),Current Problems in Sociobiology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 173–201.
Parker, G. A. (1983). Mate quality and mating decision. In Bateson, P. (ed.),Mate Choice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 141–166.
Partridge, L., Hoffmann, A., and Jones, J. S. (1987). Male size and mating success inDrosophila melanogaster andD. pseudoobscura under field conditions.Anim. Behav. 35: 468–476.
Robertson, J. G. M. (1986). Female mate choice, male strategies and the role of vocalization in the Australian frogUperlopeia rugosa.Anim. Behav. 34: 773–784.
Ryan, M. J. (1985).The Túngara Frog, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Sakaluk, S. K., and Snedden, W. A. (1990). Nightly calling durations of male sagebrush crickets,Cyphoderris strepitans: Size, mating and seasonal effects.Oikos 57: 153–160.
Schatral, A. (1990). Body size, song frequency and mating success of male bushcricketsRequena verticalis (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Listrocelidinae) in the field.Anim. Behav. 40: 982–984.
Searcy, W. A., and Andersson, M. (1986). Sexual selection and the evolution of song.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 507–533.
Sigurjónsdóttir, H., and Parker, G. A. (1981). Dung fly struggles: Evidence for assessment strategy.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 8: 219–230.
Simmons, L. W. (1986). Female choice in the field cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer). Anim. Behav.34: 1463–1470.
Simmons, L. W. (1988a). The calling song of the field cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer): Constraints on transmission and its role in intermale competition and female choice.Anim. Behav. 36: 380–394.
Simmons, L. W. (1988b). Male size, mating potential and lifetime reproductive success in the field cricket,Gryllus bimaculatus (De Geer).Anim. Behav. 36: 372–379.
Simmons, L. W. (1990). Nuptial feeding in tettigoniids: Male costs and the rates of fecundity increase.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 27: 43–47.
Simmons, L. W., and Gwynne, D. T. (1993). Reproductive investment in bushcrickets: the allocation of male and female nutrients to offspring.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 252: 1–5.
Souroukis, K., and Cade, W. H. (1993). Reproductive competition and selection on male traits at varying sex ratios in the field cricket,Gryllus pennsylvanicus.Behaviour 126: 45–62.
Tuckerman, J. F., Gwynne, D. T., and Morris, G. K. (1993). Reliable acoustic cues for female mate preference in a katydid (Scudderia curvicauda, Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae).Behav. Ecol. 4: 106–113.
Watt, W. B., Carter, P. A., and Donohue, K. (1986). Females' choice of “good genotypes” as mates is promoted by an insect mating system.Science 233: 1187–1190.
Wedell, N. (1994). Variation in nuptial gift quality in bushcrickets.Behav. Ecol. 5: 418–425.
Wedell, N. (1993). Spermatophore size in bushcrickets: Comparative evidence for nuptial gifts as a sperm protection device.Evolution 47: 1203–1212.
Wedell, N., and Arak, A. (1989). The wartbiter spermatophore and its effect on female reproductive output inDecticus verrucivorus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 24: 117–125.
Zahavi, A. (1977). The cost of honesty (Further remarks on the handicap principle).J. Theoret. Biol. 67: 603–605.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wedell, N., Sandberg, T. Female preference for large males in the bushcricketRequena sp. 5 (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). J Insect Behav 8, 513–522 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01995323
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01995323