Abstract
Most writers on resource management presume that local populations, if they act in their self-interest, seldom conserve or protect natural resources without external intervention or privatization. Using the example of forest management by villagers in the Indian Himalayas, this paper argues that rural populations can often use resources sustainably and successfully, even under assumptions of self-interested rationality. Under a set of specified social and environmental conditions, conditions that prevail in large areas of the Himalayas and may also exist in other mountain regions, community institutions are more efficient in managing resources than either private individuals or the central government. In advancing this argument, the paper undermines the often dogmatic belief in the universal superiority of private forms of ownership and management.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abernathy, V. 1991. Comment: The “one world” thesis as an obstacle to environmental preservation. InResources, environment, and population: Present knowledge, future options, edited by K. Davis and M. Bernstam, pp. 323–328. New York: Oxford University Press.
Acharya, H. 1984. Management of forest resources in Nepal: A case study of Madan Pokhra village panchayat. MPS Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
Agrawal, A. 1992. Risks, resources and politics. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Duke University, Durham, NC.
—. 1994. Rules, rule making, and rule breaking: Examining the fit between rule systems and resource use. InRules, games, and common-pool resources by E. Ostrom, R. Gardner, and J. Walker. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
Agrawal, A. 1995. How do local institutions mediate the impact of market and population pressures on resource use? Van Panchayats in the Kumaon Himalayas. Tropical Conservation and Development Program, University of Florida. Mimeo.
Alchian, A. 1950. Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory.Journal of Political Economy 58(3):211–221.
—, and H. Demsetz. 1972. Production, information costs and economic organization.American Economic Review 62:777–795.
Barzel, Y. 1989.Economic analysis of property rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Britt-Kapoor, C. 1995. Out of the woods? A social history of local institutions, changing patterns of resource use and community forest management in two central Himalayan Indian Villages. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Ithaca: Cornell University.
Brokensha, D., D. Warren, and O. Werner, eds. 1980.Indigenous knowledge systems and development. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Bromley, D. 1989.Economic interests and institutions: The conceptual foundations of public policy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Cool, J. 1983. Factors affecting pressure on mountain resource systems. InMountain development: Challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of the First International Symposium and Inauguration, December. Kathmandu: ICIMOD.
Dahlman, C. 1980.The open field system and beyond: A property rights analysis of an economic institution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eggertsson, T. 1989.Economic behavior and institutions: Principles of Neoinstitutional Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ehrenfeld, D. 1988.Conserving life on earth. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ehrlich, P. 1988. The loss of diversity: Causes and consequences. InBiodiversity, edited by E.O. Wilson, pp. 21–27. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Elster, J. 1989.The cement of society: A study of social order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fox, Jefferson. 1993. Forest resources in a Nepali Village in 1980 and 1990: The positive influence of population growth.Mountain Research and Development 13(1):89–98.
Furubotn, E., and S. Pejovich, eds. 1974.The economics of property rights. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.
Gilmour, D. 1988. Not seeing the trees for the forest: A reappraisal of the deforestation crisis in two hill districts of Nepal.Mountain Research and Development 8(4):343–350.
Government of India (GOI). 1981, 1991.General population tables, series 22, Uttar Pradesh, Part IIA. Lucknow: Census of India.
Gupta, A. 1990. The right to resource: Peasant knowledge, protocol of its “extraction”, and ethics of collaboration in extractions. WP 851, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, India.
—. 1992. Building upon people's ecological knowledge: Framework for studying culturally embedded CPR institutions. Center for Management in Agriculture, Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad, India. Mimeo.
Hardin, G. 1978. Political requirements for preserving our common heritage.In Wildlife and America, edited by H. Brokaw. Washington, DC: Council on Environmental Quality.
Hayami, Y., and V. Ruttan. 1985.Agricultural development: An international perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Lea, D.R. 1993. Melanesian axiology, communal land tenure, and the prospect of sustainable development within Papua New Guinea.Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 6(1):89–101.
Mahat, T., D. Griffin, and K. Shepherd. 1987. Human impacts on some forests of the Middle Hills of Nepal, Part 3: Forest in the subsistence economy of Sindhu Palchok and Kabhre Palanchok.Mountain Research and Development 7(1): 53–70.
Margolis, H. 1982.Selfishness, altruism and rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McKean, M. 1985. The significance of Japanese practices for managing common land in 19th and 20th centuries: A comparative perspective. Paper presented at the American Historical Association, New York.
—. 1986. Management of traditional common lands (Iriachi) in Japan. InProceedings of the conference on common property resource management. Washington, DC: BOSTID, National Academy Press.
Messerschmidt, D. 1984. Using human resources in natural resource management: Innovations in Himalayan development. Watershed Management WP. 1, ICIMOD, Kathmandu, Nepal.
—. 1987. Conservation and society in Nepal: Traditional forest management and innovative development. InLands at risk in the Third World: Local level perspectives, edited by P. Little and M. Horowitz. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Myers, N. 1976. An expanded approach to the problem of disappearing species.Science 193 (16 July):198–202.
Nelson, R., and S. Winter. 1982.An Evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Netting, R. 1981.Balancing on an Alp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
— 1993.Smallholders, householders: Farm families and the ecology of intensive, sustainable agriculture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
North, D. 1981.Structure and change in economic history. Norton: New York.
—. 1990.Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
—, and R. Thomas. 1973.The rise of the Western world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Office of the Director of Census Operations. 1961, 1971, 1981, 1991.District Census Handbook: Almora, Nainital, Pithoragarh, Town and Village Directory, Series 21, Part X-A. Lucknow: Census of India.
Ophuls, W. 1977.Ecology and the politics of scarcity. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Co.
Ostrom, E. 1990.Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E., R. Gardner, and J. Walker. 1994.Rules, games, and common-Pool resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Ostrom, E., L. Schroeder, and S. Wynne. 1993.Institutional incentives and sustainable development: Infrastructure policies in perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Ouchi, W. 1980. Markets, bureaucracies and clans.Administrative Science Quarterly 25:129–141.
Raven, P. 1991. Winners and losers in the twentieth-century struggle to survive. InResources, environment, and population: present knowledge, future options, edited by K. Davis and M. Bernstam, pp. 259–167. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sah, N., S. Bhatt, and R. Pande, eds. 1990.Himalaya: Environment, resources, and development. Almora, India: Shree Almora Book Depot.
Schultz, T. 1964.Transforming traditional agriculture. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Scott, J. 1976.The moral economy of the peasant. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Shah, S. 1982. Micro-level planning and strategies for agricultural development in Mid-Himalayas. Almora, India: Vivekanand Laboratory for Hill Agriculture (ICAR), Mimeo.
—. 1986.Planing and management of natural and human resources in the mountains. New Delhi: Yatan Publications.
Singh, J., ed. 1985.Environmental regeneration in Himalaya. Nainital, India: Gyanodaya Prakashan.
Somanathan, E. 1990.Public forests and private interests Mimeo. New Delhi: Indian Statistical Institute.
Warner, K. 1991. Shifting cultivators: local technical knowledge and natural resource management in the humid tropics. Community Forestry Note 8. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.
Warren, D., J. Slikkerveer, and D. Brokensha. 1991.Indigenous knowledge systems: The cultural dimensions of development. London: Kegan Paul International.
Williamson, O. 1985.The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. London: The Free Press.
Wilson, E. 1988. The current state of biological diversity. InBiodiversity, edited by E.O. Wilson, pp. 3–20. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Agrawal, A. The community vs. the market and the state: Forest use inUttarakhand in the Indian Himalayas. J Agric Environ Ethics 9, 1–15 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01965667
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01965667