Abstract
Species figure prominently in all biological studies, but what a species actually is and how we recognize it in practice is still a much-debated issue. Present discussion revolves around five major species concepts: the biological, the evolutionary, the cladistic, the recognition and the phylogenetic concepts. Each of these species notions has its theoretical and practical problems. One important point that has emerged from recent discussions on the ontological status of species is that there is a tension between species concepts based on interbreeding and those based on genealogy, and that practical application of these two kinds of concept may give rise to incompatible results. Species recognized by one species concept appear to be essentially different entities compared with species demarcated by another. However, these different species may all represent real and objective entities in nature. What we perceive as a species depends on the evolutionary processes that we have made objects of our research. Some of these processes are between entities of the genealogical hierarchy of nature, while other processes relate to nature's ecological hierarchy. It is essential that our species concept should be adjusted to the focal level of our research program, thereby taking into full account the two process hierarchies of nature.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ax, P., Das Phylogenetische System. G. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart 1984.
Bock, W., The synthetic explanation of macroevolutionary change-a reductionist approach. Bull. Carnegie Mus. nat. Hist. no.13, (1979). 20–69
Brandon, R. N., Adaptation and environment. Princeton University Press, Princeton 1990.
Bremer, K., and Wanntorp, H.-E., Geographical populations or biological species in phylogenetic reconstruction? Syst. Zool.28 (1979) 220–224.
Chandler, C. R., and Gromko, M. H., On the relationship between species concepts and speciation processes. Syst. Zool.38 (1989) 116–125.
Coyne, J. A., Orr, H. A., and Futuyma, D. J., Do we need a new species concept? Syst. Zool.37 (1988) 190–200.
Cracraft, J., Species concepts and speciation analysis. Curr. Ornithol.1 (1983) 159–187.
Cracraft, J., Origin and evolution of continental biotas: speciation and historical congruence within the Australian avifauna. Evolution40 (1986) 977–996.
Cracraft J., Species concepts and the ontology of evolution. Biol. Phil.2 (1987) 329–346.
Cracraft, J., Species as entities of biological theory. in: What the Philosophy of Biology Is, pp. 31–52. Ed. M. Ruse. Kluwer, Dordrecht 1989a.
Cracraft, J., Speciation and its ontology: the empirical consequences of alternative species concepts for understanding patterns and processes of differentiation, in: Speciation and Its Consequences, pp. 28–59. Eds D. Otte and J. A. Endler. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass. 1989b.
Darwin, C., On the Origin of Species. Reprinted 1963, Washington Square Press, New York 1859.
De Queiroz, K., and Donoghue, M. J., Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem. Cladistics4 (1988) 317–338.
De Queiroz, K., and Donoghue, M., Phylogenetic systematics or Nelson's version of cladistics? Cladistics6 (1990) 61–75.
Eldredge, N., Unfinished Synthesis. Oxford Univ. Press, New York 1985 (paperback edition 1988).
Eldredge, N., Macroevolutionary Dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New York 1989.
Eldredge, N., and Cracraft, J., Phylogenetic patterns and the evolutionary process. Columbia University Press, New York 1980.
Eldredge, N., and Salthe, S. N., Hierarchy and evolution. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol.1 (1984) 184–208.
Endler, J. A., Conceptual and other problems in speciation, in: Speciation and Its Consequences, pp. 625–648. Eds D. Otte and J. A. Endler. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass. 1989.
Häuser, C. L., The debate about the biological species concept-a review. Z. zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch.25 (1987) 241–257.
Hengeveld, R., Mayr's ecological species criterion. Syst. Zool.37 (1988) 47–55.
Hennig, W., Phylogenetic Systematics. Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana 1966.
Hennig, W., Aufgaben und Probleme stammesgeschichtlicher Forschung. Pareys Studientexte 35, Paul Parey, Berlin & Hamburg 1984.
Hull, D. L., Individuality and selection. A. Rev. ecol. Syst.11 (1980) 311–332.
Kitcher, P., Some puzzles about species, in: What the Philosophy of Biology Is, pp. 183–208. Ed. M. Ruse. Kluwer, Dordrecht 1989.
Lambert, D. M., Michaux, B., and White, C. S., Are species selfdefining? Syst. Zool.36 (1987) 196–205.
Liden, M., and Oxelman, B., Species-pattern or process? Taxon38 (1989) 228–232.
Masters, J. C., and Spencer, H. G., Why we need a new genetic species concept. Syst. Zool.38 (1989) 270–279.
Mayr, E., Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York 1942.
Mayr, E., Isolation as an evolutionary factor. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc.103 (1959) 221–230.
Mayr, E., Principles of Systematic Zoology. McGraw-Hill, New York 1969.
Mayr, E., Populations, Species, and Evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1970.
Mayr, E., The Growth of Biological Thought. Belknap (Harvard University Press), Cambridge 1982.
McKitrick, M. C., and Zink, R. M., Species concepts in ornithology. The Condor90 (1988) 1–14.
Mishler, B. D., and Brandon, R. M., Individuality, pluralism, and the phylogenetic species concept. Biol. Phil.2 (1987) 397–414
Mishler, B. D., and Donoghue, M. J., Species concepts: a case for pluralism. Syst. Zool.31 (1982) 491–503.
Nixon, K. C., and Wheeler, Q. D., An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. Cladistics6 (1990) 211–223.
Oster, G., and Alberch, P., Evolution and bifurcation of developmental programs. Evolution36 (1982) 444–459.
Paterson, H. E. H., More evidence against speciation by reinforcement. S. Afr. J. Sci.74 (1978) 369–371.
Paterson, H. E. H., The recognition concept of species, in: Species and Speciation, pp. 21–29. Ed. E. S. Vrba. Transvaal, Mus. Monogr. 4, 1985.
Remane, J., Der Artbegriff in Zoologie, Phylogenetik and Biostratigraphie. Paläont. Z.59 (1985) 171–182.
Ridley, M., The cladistic solution to the species problem. Biol. Philos.4 (1989) 1–16.
Rieppel, O. C., Fundamentals of Comparative Biology. Birkhäuser, Basel 1988.
Rosenberg, A., The Structure of Biological Science. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1985.
Salthe, S. N., Evolving Hierarchical Systems. Columbia Univ. Press, New York 1985.
Simpson, G. C., Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia Univ. Press, New York 1961.
Sluys, R., The meaning and implications of genealogical tree diagrams. Z. zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch.22 (1984) 1–8.
Sudhaus, W., Artbegriff und Artbildung in zoologischer Sicht. Z. zool Syst. Evolut.-forsch.22 (1984) 183–211.
Templeton, A. R., The meaning of species and speciation: a genetic perspective, in: Speciation and Its Consequences, pp. 3–27. Eds D. Otte and J. A. Endler. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass. 1989.
Vrba, E. S., and Eldredge, N., Individuals, hierarchies and processes: towards a more complete evolutionary theory. Paleobiology10 (1984) 146–171.
Wheeler, Q. D., and Nixon, K. C., Another way of looking at the species problem: a reply to de Queiroz and Donoghue. Cladistics6 (1990) 77–81.
Wiley, E. O., The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. Syst. Zool.27 (1978) 17–26.
Wiley, E. O., Phylogenetics. The Theory and Practice of Phylogenetic Systematics. John Wiley & Sons, New York 1981.
Wiley, E. O., Kinds individuals and theories, in: What the Philosophy of Biology Is, pp. 289–300. Ed. M. Ruse. Kluwer, Dordrecht 1989.
Willmann, R., Biospecies und phylogenetische Systematik. Z. zool. Syst. Evolut.-forsch.21 (1983) 241–249.
Willmann, R., Die Art in Raum und Zeit. Paul Parey, Berlin & Hamburg 1985.
Willmann, R., Reproductive isolation and the limits of the species in time. Cladistics2 (1986) 356–358.
Willmann, R., Missverständnisse um das biologische Artkonzept. Paläont. Z.61 (1987) 3–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sluys, R. Species concepts, process analysis, and the hierarchy of nature. Experientia 47, 1162–1170 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01918380
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01918380