Abstract
The aim of this study was the evaluation of the diagnostic potentials of transesophageal 3D-echocardiography in the determination of mitral valve stenosis. 54 patients were investigated by transthoracic and multiplane transesophageal echocardiography. In 41 patients cardiac catheterization was performed. 3D-echocardiographic data acquisition was performed by automatic transducer rotation at 2° increments over a span of 180°. The transesophageal probe was linked to an ultrasound unit and to a 3D-workstation capable of ECG- and respiration gated data acquisition, postprocessing and 2D/ 3D image reconstruction. The mitral valve was visualized in sequential cross-sectional planes out of the 3D data set. The spatial position of the planes was indicated in a reference image. In the cross-sectional plane with the narrowest part of the leaflets the orifice area was measured by planimetry. For topographic information a 3D view down from the top of the left atrium was reconstructed. Measurements were compared to conventional transthoracic planimetry, to Doppler-echocardiographic pressure half time and to invasive data. The mean difference to transthoracic planimetry, pressure half time and to invasive measurements were 0.3 ± 0.1 cm2, 0.2 ± 0.1 cm2 and 0.1 ± 0.1 cm2, respectively. Remarkable differences between the 3D- echocardiographic and the 2D- or Doppler- echocardiographic methods were observed in patients with severe calcification or aortic regurgitation. In 22% of the patients the 3D data set was not of diagnostic quality. New diagnostic information from a 3D view of the mitral valve could be obtained in 69% of the patients. Thus, although image quality is limited, 3D- echocardiography provides new topographic information in mitral valve stenosis. It allows the use of a new quantitative method, by which image plane positioning errors and flow-dependent calculation is avoided.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Nakatani S, Masuyama T, Kodama K, Kitabatake A, Fujii K, Kamada T. Value and limitations of Doppler echocardiography in the quantification of stenotic mitral valve area: comparison of the pressure half-time and the continuity equation methods. Circulation 1988; 77(1): 78–85.
Moro E, Nicolosi GL, Zanuttini D, Cervesato E, Roelandt J. Influence of aortic regurgitation on the assessment of the pressure half- time and derived mitral-valve area in patients with mitral stenosis. Eur Heart J 1988; 9(9): 1010–7.
Flachskampf FA, Weyman AE, Gillam L, Liu CM, Abascal VM, Thomas JD. Aortic regurgitation shortens Doppler pressure half- time in mitral stenosis: clinical evidence, in vitro simulation and theoretic analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 16(2): 396–404.
Belohlavek M, Foley DA, Gerber TC, Kinter TM, Greenleaf JF, Seward JB. Three- and four-dimensional cardiovascular ultrasound imaging: a new era for echocardiography. Mayo Clin Proc 1993; 68: 221–40.
Kupferwasser I, Mohr-Kahaly S, Erbel R, Makowski T, Wittlich N, Kearney P, Mumm B, Meyer J. Three-dimensional imaging of cardiac mass lesions by transesophageal echocardiographic computed tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1994; 7: 561–70.
Wollschläger H, Zeiher AM, Klein HP, Kasper W, Wollschläger S, Geibel A, Just H. Transesophageal echo computer tomography: A new method of dynamic 3-D reconstruction of the heart. Biomed Tech Berlin 1989; 34 suppl: 10–1.
Belohlavek M, Foley DA, Gerber TC, Greenleaf JF, Seward JB. Three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of the atrial septum: Normal and pathologic anatomy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993; 22: 1673–8.
King D, King Jr. D, Shao M. Evaluation of in vitro measurement accuracy of a three-dimensional scanner. J Ultasound Med 1991; 10: 77–82.
Collins SM, Chandran KB, Skorton DJ. Three-dimensional cardiac imaging. Echocardio-graphy 1988; 5: 311–9.
Sheikh KH, Smith SW, Ramm Ov, Kisslo J. Real-time, three- dimensional echocardiography: feasibility and initial use. Echocardiography 1991; 8: 119–125
Raqueno R, Ghosh A, Nanda NC, Schott J, Moos S. Four-dimensional reconstruction of two-dimensional echocardiographic images. Echocardiography 1989; 6: 323–337.
Hatle L, Angelsen B, Tromsdal A. Noninvasive assessment of atrioventricular pressure half-time by Doppler ultrasound. Circulation 1979; 60: 1096.
Perry GJ, Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Byard C, Soto B. Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by Doppler color flow mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 1987; 9: 952–9.
Gorlin R, Gorlin SG. Hydraulic formula for calculation of the area of the stenotic mitral valve, other cardiac valves, and central circulatory shunts. Am Heart J 1951; 41: 1.
Cohen MV, Gorlin R. Modified orifice equation for the calculation of mitral valve area. Am Heart J 1972; 84: 839.
Schweitzer P, Bardos P, Krebs W, Erbel R, Minale C, Imm S, Messmer BJ, Effert S. Morphometric investigations in mitral stenosis using two dimensional echocardiography. Br Heart J 1982; 48: 54–60.
Henry WL, Griffith JM, Michaelis LL, McIntosh CL, Morrow AG, Epstein SE. Measurement of mitral orifice area in patients with mitral valve disease by real-time two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 1975; 51: 827–831.
Wann LS, Weyman ARE, Feigenbaum H, Dillon JC, Johnston KW, Eggleton RC. Determination of mitral valve area by cross-sectional echocardiography. Ann Intern Med 1978; 88: 337–341.
Nichol PM, Gilbert BW, Kisslo JA. Two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of mitral stenosis. Circulation 1977; 55: 120–128.
Odemuyiwa O, Bourke JP, Peart I, Been M, Heads A, Hall RJ. Valvular stenosis: a comparison of clinical assessment, echocardiography, Doppler ultrasound and catheterization. Int J Cardiol 1990; 26(1): 59–65.
Holen J, Simonsen S. Determination of pressure gradient in mitral stenosis with Doppler echocardiography. Br Heart J 1979; 41: 529–535.
Stamm RB, Martin RP. Quantification of pressure gradients across stenotic valves by Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 1983; 2: 707–18.
Hatle L, Brubakk A, Tromsdal A, Angelsen B. Noninvasive assessment of pressure drop in mitral stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Br Heart J 1978; 40: 131–40.
Pearlman AS. Role of echocardiography in the diagnosis and evaluation of severity of mitral and tricuspid stenosis. Circulation 1991; 84 (suppl I): I-193–I-197.
Gonzalez MA, Child JS, Krivokapich J. Comparison of two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography and intracardiac hemodynamics for quantification of mitral stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1987; 60: 327–332.
Greenleaf JF, Belohlavek M, Gerber TC, Foley DA, Seward JB. Multidimensional visualization in echocardiography: an introduction. Mayo Clin Proc 1993; 68: 213–220.
Schwartz SL, Qi-Ling C, Azevedo J, Pandian NG. Simulation of intraoperative visualization of cardiac structures and study of dynamic surgical anatomy with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. Am J Cardiol 1994; 73: 501–507.
Wang XF, Li ZA, Cheng TO, Deng YB, Zeng LH, Hu G, Lu P. Clinical application of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Am Heart J 1994; 128: 380–8.
Kupferwasser I, Mohr-Kahaly S, Dohmen G, Spiecker M, Oelert H. Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic determinants of successful repair in mitral valve prolapse. Circulation 1995; 92: 191.
Levine RA, Handschumacher MD, Sanfilippo AJ, Hagege AA, Harrigan P, Marshall JE, Weyman AE. Three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction of the mitral valve, with implications for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse. Circulation 1989; 80: 589–598.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kupferwasser, I., Mohr-Kahaly, S., Menzel, T. et al. Quantification of mitral valve stenosis by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. Int J Cardiac Imag 12, 241–247 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797737
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797737