Abstract
The fragmentation of autosomes in the karyotypes ofEnallagma cyathigerum (Charp.) (n=14→15),Mecistogaster sp. (n=15),Hetaerina rosea Sel. (n=14),Libellula depressa L. (n=12→13),Orthetrum coerulescens (Fabr.) (n=12→13),Diplacodes bipunctata (Br.) (n=13→15) andD. haematodes (Burm.) (n=12→13) is discussed. Original material ofMecistogaster andHetaerina was not available.
Fragmentations were found to be the only way in which the recombination index is obligatorily changed (increased) in dragonflies. In at least five out of the seven cases considered the chromosome number is not stabilised: cells in which fragmentation occurred and those in which it did not are found in the same individual (Enallagma, Libellula, Orthetrum, Diplacodes). Fragmentation results in an increase of chromosome number (a) up to the family type number level (Libellula, Orthetrum, D. haematodes), (b) above the latter (Hetaerina) and (c) above any chromosome number ever reported in dragonflies (Mecistogaster, D. bipunctata). In our material the element or elements formed by fragmentation have always the size and usually also the heterochromatic features of the m-chromosomes, irrespective of the presence or absence of the latter in the original complement.
A review of species in which fusions of autosomes were recorded or can be assumed is given.Orthetrum brachiale (Beauv.) (n=11) is added to the list. The situation in this species and inSympetrum eroticum Sel. is discussed in detail.
The most essential differences between the fusion of (an) autosome (s) with the sex element on one hand (cf.Kiauta, 1969), and the fusion of two or more autosomes on the other, lies in the observations: (a) that in the former case, fused and unfused complements occur in one individual, whereas the latter is specifically characteristic and occurs in all cells, all individuals and all populations of the species, and (b) that autosomal fusion results in an increase of chiasma frequency, due to which the recombination index in secondarily low-n complements remains the same as it was in the primary high-n sets, or becomes even higher (O. brachiale, S. eroticum).
Autosomal fragmentation (found so far in some advanced forms only) is considered as a character of phylogenetic advancement. Autosomal fusion, on the other hand, does not have any relation with phylogeny.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Asana, J. J. &S. Makino, (1935). A comparative study of the chromosomes of the Indian dragonflies.J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Imp. Univ.,VI,4: 67–86.
Bartenef, A. N., (1915). Insectes Pseudoneuroptères. I.Libellulidae. Livraison 1.Faune de la Russie et des pays limitrophes, pp. 1–352. Petrograd. (In Russian).
Bartenef, A. N., (1919). Insectes Pseudoneuroptères. I.Libellulidae. Livraison 2.Faune de la Russie et des pays limitrophes. pp. 353–576. Petrograd. (In Russian).
Brink, J. M. van &B. Kiauta, (1964). Notes on chromosome behaviour in the spermatogenesis of the damselflyEnallagma cyathigerum (Charp.) (Odonata: Coenagrionidae).Genetica 35: 171–174.
Carnoy, B. J., (1885). La cytodiérèse chez les arthropodes. IV. Pseudo-névroptères.La Cellule 1: 279–282.
Cruden, R. W., (1968). Chromosome numbers of some North American dragonflies (Odonata).Canad. J. Gen. Cytol. 10: 200–214.
Cumming, R. B., (1964).Cytogenetic studies in the order Odonata. Thesis, Univ. of Texas.
Darlington, C. D., (1939).The evolution of genetic systems. Cambridge Univ. Press.
Dasgupta, J., (1957). Cytological studies on the Indian dragonflies. II. A study of the chromosomes during meiosis in thirty species of IndianOdonata (Insecta).Proc. Zool. Soc. Calcutta 10 1–66.
Fraser, F. C., (1957).A reclassification of the order Odonata. Roy. Zool. Soc., New South Wales.
Fuchsówna, J. &J. Sawczyńska, (1928). Zachowanie sie heterochromosomów podczas spermatogenezy u wažek (Odonata). Cz. I.Aeschna grandis L.—Libellula quadrimaculata L.Arch. Tow. Nauk. Lwow,III, 4: 177–197. (In Polish).
Hirai, H., (1956). Chromosomes of six species of dragonfiles.Zool. Mag. (Jap).65: 189–202.
Hogben, L., (1921). Studies on synapsis. III. The nucleolar organisation of the germ cell inLibellula depressa.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. (B),92: 60–80.
Kennedy, C. H., (1920). Forty-two hitherto unrecognized genera and subgenera ofZygoptera.Ohio J. Sci. 21: 83–88.
Kennedy, C. H., (1922a). The phylogeny and the geographical distribution of the genusLibellula (Odonata).Ent. News 33: 65–71.
Kennedy, C. H., (1922b). The phylogeny and the geographical distribution of the genusLibellula (Odonata).Ent. News 33: 105–111.
Kiauta, B., (1966). The chromosome behaviour in spermatogenetic meiosis of the dragonflySympetrum striolatum (Charp.) (Odonata: Libellulidae) from Luxembourg.Bull. Soc. Nat. Luxemb. 69: 54–60.
Kiauta, B., (1967). considerations on the evolution of the chromosome complement inOdonata.Genetica 38: 430–446.
Kiauta, B., (1968). Variation in size of the dragonfly m-chromosome, with considerations on its significance for the chorogeography and taxonomy of the orderOdonata, and notes on the validity of the rule of Reinig.Genetica 39: 64–74.
Kiauta, B., (1969). Sex chromosomes and sex determining mechanisms inOdonata, with a review of the cytological conditions in the familyGomphidae, and references to the karyotypic evolution in the order.Genetica 40: 00–00.
Kichijo, H., (1942a). Chromosomes ofSympetrum eroticum eroticum (Odonata).Jap. J. Genet. 18: 195–196. (In Japanese).
Kichijo, H., (1942b). Konchu no Senshokutai (III) (Tombo—Moku 1). (Insect chromosomes. III. Order dragonflies. Part 1).Nagasaki Igakukai Zasshi (Nagasaki Medical Mag.) 20: 1084–1092. (In Japanese).
Longfield, C., (1955). TheOdonata of N. Angola. Part I. A revision of the African species of the genusOrthetrum.Publ. Cult. Companhia Diamantes Angola 27: 11–64.
Makalowskaja, W. N., (1940). Comparative karyological studies of dragonflies (Odonata).Arch. Russ. anat. hist. embriol. 25: 24–39, 120–121.
Makino, S., (1935). A comparative study of the chromosomes in the Indian dragonflies.Jap. J. Genet. 11: 234–235.
Needham, J. G. &E. Fisher, (1936). The nymphs of North American libelluline dragonflies.Trans. Am. Ent. Soc. 62 (1015): 107–116.
Needham, J. G. &M. J. Westfall, Jr., (1955).A manual of the dragonflies of North America (Anisoptera) including the Greater Antilles and the provinces of the Mexican border. Univ. California Press; Berkeley—Los Angeles.
Oguma, K., (1915). A study of the chromosomes of dragonflies.Zool. Mag. (Jap.) 27: 241–250.
Oguma, K., (1917). Entomology and cytology.Nawa-kinen-rombunshu, pp. 105–114. (In Japanese).
Oguma, K., (1930). A comparative study of the spermatocyte chromosome in allied species of the dragonfly.J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Imp. Univ.,VI,1: 1–32.
Oguma, K., (1942). Observationes de formis compositionibusque chromosomatum et dispositionibus eorum tempore divisionis atque propositio aliquorum novorum terminorum.Jap. J. Genet. 18: 205–216.
Oksala, T., (1939). Über Tetraploidie der Binde-und Fettgewebe bei den Odonaten.Hereditas 25: 132–144.
Oksala, T., (1943). Zytologische Studien an Odonaten. I. Chromosomenverhältnisse bei der GattungAeschna mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der postreduktionellen Teilung der Bivalente.Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. (A),IV,4: 1–64.
Oksala, T., (1945). Zytologische Studien an Odonaten. III. Die Ovogenese.Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. (A),IV,9: 1–32.
Oksala, T., (1952). Chiasma formation and chiasma interference inOdonata.Hereditas 38: 449–480.
Omura, T., (1955). A comparative study of the spermatogenesis in the Japanese dragonflies. I. FamilyLibellulidae.Biol. J. Okayama Univ. 2: 95–135.
Omura, T., (1957). A comparative study of the spermatogensis in the Japanese dragonflies. II. FamiliesAeschnidae, Gomphidae andCalopterygidae.Biol. J. Okayama Univ. 3: 1–86.
Ray Chaudhuri, S. P. &J. Das Gupta, (1949). Cytological studies on the Indian dragonflies. I. Structure and behaviour of chromosomes in six species of dragonflies (Odonata).Proc. Zool. Soc. Bengal 2: 81–93.
Rieger, R., A. Michaelis &M. M. Green, (1968).A glossary of genetics and cytogenetics, classical and molecular. Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York.
Smith, E., (1916). Spermatogenesis of the dragonflySympetrum semicinctum (Say) with remarks uponLibellula basalis.Biol. Bull. 31: 269–290.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kiauta, B. Autosomal fragmentations and fusions in odonata and their evolutionary implications. Genetica 40, 158–180 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01787347
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01787347