Abstract
In this study, U.S. institutions that offer doctoral programs in education were surveyed and institutional catalogues of the past decade were reviewed to determine trends regarding the Ph.D. versus the Ed.D. Results of the study showed that (a) there is no clear institutional movement toward one degree title or the other; (b) research universities are increasingly reluctant and comprehensive colleges and universities are increasingly likely to offer the Ed.D. as their only doctoral degree title, and (c) requirements for the two doctoral titles are remarkably similar, including competencies in research and statistics. Findings are discussed in relation to three common positions of those who favor the Ed.D. over the Ph.D.: (a) the professional school argument, (b) the unification argument, and (c) the autonomy argument. The article concludes with a call for increased national dialogue to strengthen the education profession by reducing confusion between its two doctoral degree titles.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Andersen, D.G. (1983). Differentiation of the Ed.D. and Ph.D. in education.Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 55–58.
Boyer, E.L. (1990).Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, N.J.: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Brown, L.D. (1990, April). A perspective on the Ph.D.-Ed.D. discussion in schools of education. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (1987).A classification of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Carpenter, D.S. (1987). On-going dialogue: Degrees of difference.The Review of Higher Education, 10(3), 281–286.
Clifford, G.J., & Guthrie, J.W. (1988).Ed School: A brief for professional education. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
The Council of Graduate Schools in the United States (1991).Role and nature of the doctoral dissertation. Washington, DC.
Courtenay, B.C. (1988). Eliminating the confusion over the Ed.D. and Ph.D. in colleges and schools of education.Innovative Higher Education, 23(1), 11–21.
Dill, D.D., & Morrison, J.L. (1985). Ed.D. and Ph.D. research training in the field of higher education: A survey and proposal.The Review of Higher Education, 8(2), 169–186.
Goodlad, J.L. (1990).Teachers for our nation's schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Holmes Group, (1990).Tomorrow's schools: Principles for the design of professional development schools. East Lansing, MI.
Moore, H.E., Russell, J.H., & Ferguson, D.G. (1960).The doctorate in education (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: The American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
Moore, T.C. (1979).Peterson's guide to graduate programs in business, education, health and law. Princeton, N.J.: Peterson's Guides.
Moore, T.C. (1989).Peterson's guide to graduate programs in business, education, health and law (23rd ed.) Princeton, NJ: Peterson's Guides.
Osguthorpe, R.T., Zhou, L., & Schneider, C. (1990, April).The Graduate Degree Dilemma: A school of education's mission and its programs. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
Osguthorpe, R.T., & Wong, M.J. (1992, February). The master's degree and extended teacher preparation programs: A call for consensus. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Orlando, Florida.
Schneider, B.L., Brown, L., Denny, T., Mathis, B.C., & Schmidt, W. (1984). The deans' perspective on the status of doctoral programs in schools of education.Phi Delta Kappan, 65, 617–620.
Smith, P. (1990).Killing the spirit: Higher education in America. New York: Viking Press.
Wisniewski, R. (1990, February).Colleges of education twenty years hence. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Chicago, Illinois.
Additional information
Russell T. Osguthorpe, Associate Dean of Brigham Young University's College of Education, has done research in special education, instructional design and technology, and teacher education. He is presently responsible for graduate programs, research, and technology in the College. Dr. Osguthorpe received his education at Brigham Young University. Mei Jiuan Wong, a doctoral candidate in the Department of Instructional Science, Brigham Young University, has done research on instructional design and technology and teacher education. She is currently completing her dissertation on decision making in instructional design.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Osguthorpe, R.T., Wong, M.J. The Ph.D. versus the Ed.D.: Time for a decision. Innov High Educ 18, 47–63 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01742197
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01742197