Abstract
Objective
Evaluation of low-level PEEP (5 cm H2O) and the two different CPAP trigger modes in the Bennett 7200a ventilator (demand-valve and flow-by trigger modes) on inspiratory work of breathing (Wi) during the weaning phase.
Design
Prospective controlled study.
Setting
The intensive care unit of a university hospital.
Patients
Six intubated patients with normal lung function (NL), ventilated because of non-pulmonary trauma or post-operative stay in the ICU, and six patients recovering from acute respiratory failure due to exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), breathing either FB-CPAP or DV-CPAP with the Bennett 7200a ventilator.
Interventions
The patients studied were breathing with zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP), as well as CPAP of 5 cm H2O (PEEP), with the following respiratory modes: the demand-valve trigger mode, pressure support of 5 cm H2O, and the flow-by trigger mode (base flow of 20 l/min and flow trigger of 2 l/min). Furthermore, Wi during T-piece breathing was evaluated.
Measurements and results
Wi was determined using a modified Campbell's diagram. Total inspiratory work (Wi), work against flow-resistive resistance (Wires), work against elastic resistance (Wiel), work imposed by the ventilator system (Wimp), dynamic intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPidyn), airway pressure decrease during beginning inspiration (Paw) and spirometric parameters were measured. In the NL group, only minor, clinically irrelevant changes in the measured variables were detected. In the COPD group, in contrast, PEEP reduced Wi and its components Wires and Wiel significantly compared to the corresponding ZEEP settings. This was due mainly to a significant decrease in PEEPidyn when external PEEP was applied. Flow-by imposed less Wi on the COPD patients during PEEP than did demand-valve CPAP. Differences in Wimp between the flow-by and demand-valve trigger models were significant for both groups. However, in relation to Wi these differences were small.
Conclusion
We conclude that the application of low-level external PEEP benefits COPD patients because it reduces inspiratory work, mainly by lowering the inspiratory threshold represented by PEEPidyn. Differences between the trigger modes of the ventilator used in this study were small and can be compensated for by the application of a small amount of pressure support.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Samodelov LF, Falke KJ (1988) Total inspiratory work with modern demand valve devices compared to continuous flow CPAP. Intensive Care Med 14: 632–639
Moran JL, Homan S, O'Fathartaigh M, Jackson M, Leppard P (1992) Inspiratory work imposed by continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machines: the effect of CPAP level and endotracheal tube size. Intensive Care Med 18: 148–154
Sassoon CSH, Giron AE, Ely EA, Light RW (1989) Inspiratory work of breathing on flow-by and demand-flow continuous positive airway pressure. Crit Care Med 17: 1108–1114
Sassoon CSH, Lodia R, Rheeman CH, Kuei JH, Light RW, Mahutte CK (1992) Inspiratory muscle work of breathing during flow-by, demand-flow, and continuous-flow systems in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 145: 1219–1222
Baydur A, Behrakis PK, Zin WA, Jaeger M, Milic-Emili J (1982) A simple method for assessing the validity of the oesophageal balloon technique. Am Rev Respir Dis 126: 788–791
Brunner JX, Wolff G (1988) Pulmonary function indices in critical care patients. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 118–121
Petrof BJ, Legar M, Goldberg P, Milic-Emili J, Gottfried SB (1990) Continuous positive airway pressure reduces work of breathing and dyspnea during weaning from mechanical ventilation in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 141: 281–289
Marini JJ (1988) Monitoring during mechanical ventilation. Clin Chest Med 9: 73–100
Brochard L, Harf A, Lorino H, Lemaire F (1989) Inspiratory pressure support prevents diaphragmatic fatigue during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 139: 513–521
Agostini E, Campbell EJM, Freedman S (1970) Energetics. In: Campbell EJM, Agostini E, Newsom Davis J (eds) The respiratory muscles. Lloyd-Luke, London, pp 115–124
Sharp JT, Van Lith P, Briney R, Johnson FN (1968) The thorax in chronic obstructive lung disease. Am J Med 44: 39–46
Agostini E, Mead J (1964) Statics of the respiratory system. In: Handbook of physiology, sect 3, vol 1. American Physiological Society; Washington, DC pp 387–409
Quanjer P (1983) Standardised lung function testing. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 19 [Suppl 5]: 1–95
Fleury B, Murciano D, Talamo C, Aubier M, Pariente R, Milic-Emili J (1985) Work of breathing in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in acute respiratory failure. Am Rev Respir Dis 131: 822–827
Katz JA, Kraemer RW, Gjerde GE (1985) Inspiratory work and airway pressure with continuous positive airway pressure delivery systems. Chest 88: 519–526
Katz JA, Marks JD (1985) Inspiratory work with and without continuous positive airway pressure in patients with acute respiratory failure. Anesthesiology 63: 598–607
Haluszka J, Chartrand DA, Grassino AE, Milic-Emili J (1990) Intrinsic PEEP and arterial PCO2 in stable patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 141: 1194–1197
Marini JJ (1989) Should PEEP be used in airflow obstruction? (editorial) Am Rev Respir Dis 140: 1–3
Tan IKS, Bhatt SB, Tam YH, Oh TE (1993) Effects of PEEP on dynamic hyperinflation in patients with airflow limitation. Br J Anaesth 70: 267–272
Smith TC, Marini JJ (1988) Impact of PEEP on lung mechanics and work of breathing in severe airflow obstruction. J Appl Physiol 65: 1488–1499
Sassoon CSH, Light RW, Lodia R, Sieck GC, Mahutte CK (1991) Pressuretime product during continuous positive airway pressure, pressure support ventilation, and t-piece breathing during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am Rev Respir Dis 143: 496–475
Vallverdú I, Ortiz A, Bak E, Net A, Benito S, Mancebo J (1993) Effects of demand valve continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and flow-by CPAP during weaning from mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 18 [Suppl 2]: S64
Brochard L, Pluskwa F, Lemaire F (1987) Improved efficacy of spontaneous breathing with inspiratory pressure support. Am Rev Respir Dis 136: 411–415
Tokioka H, Saito S, Kosaka F (1989) Effect of pressure support ventilation on breathing patterns and respiratory work. Intensive Care Med 15: 491–494
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Supported by “Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft” SFB 330 “Organprotektion” Project B17
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sydow, M., Golisch, W., Buscher, H. et al. Effect of low-level PEEP on inspiratory work of breathing in intubated patients, both with healthy lungs and with COPD. Intensive Care Med 21, 887–895 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01712329
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01712329