Abstract
In-situ investigations on the life of the common sea star (Asterias rubens L.) were carried out in 1976, employing the Underwater Laboratory “Helgoland“ in Lübeck Bay (Western Baltic Sea). The abundance ofA. rubens amounted to 2–31 m−2 on sediment (fine sand), and to 324–809 m−2 on mobile algal carpets drifting over the bottom. Actual population parameters (abundance, size class distribution) are influenced by both substrate quality and drifting. Stomach investigations revealed prey-size selectivity: Small sea stars feed mainly on the snailHydrobia ulvae when living on the sediment, but on mussel brood(Mytilus edulis) in the phytal. The principal food items of larger sea stars are the sand-dwelling clamMacoma baltica and the phytal-living isopodIdotea baltica respectively.A. rubens is very adaptive to the food available; the diversity of its diet corresponds to the species diversity found in its environment. A change of biotope during active or passive migrations causes switching. The sea star is able to catch motile animals and to dig out infaunal clams. It exhibits a diurnal feeding pattern related to light periodicity; the activity decreases at night. The average frequency of feeding is highly dependent on predator body size; it declines with growth. In-situ experiments indicate an exponential relationship between the feeding duration uponM. baltica and the quotient of clam size to logarithm of sea-star size. An approach is made toward a rough estimate of macrofauna consumption byA. rubens on sediment. The sea star seems to be an important predator and thus a competitor of demersal fishes on soft bottoms of the western Baltic Sea.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Arntz, W. E., 1971. Biomasse und Produktion des Makrobenthos in den tieferen Teilen der Kieler Bucht im Jahr 1968. Kieler Meeresforsch.27, 36–72.
—— & Brunswig, D., 1975. An approach to estimating the production of macrobenthos and demersal fish in a Western BalticAbra alba community. Merentutkimuslait. Havsforsk. Inst. Skr. Helsingfors239, 195–205.
Brun, E., 1968. Extreme population density of the starfishAsterias rubens L. on a bed of Iceland scallop,Chlamys islandica (O. F. Müller). Astarte32, 1–4.
Bull, H. O., 1934. Aquarium observations on the rate of growth and enemies of the common star-fish,Asterias rubens L. Rep. Dove mar. Lab. (Ser. 3)2, 60–65.
Feder, H. & Møller Christensen, A., 1966. Aspects of Asteroid biology In: Physiology of Echinodermata. Ed. by R. A. Boolootian. Interscience Publs., New York, 87–127.
Finnish IBP-PM Group 1969. Quantitative sampling equipment for the littoral benthos. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol.54, 185–193.
Galtsoff, P. S. & Loosanoff, V. L., 1939. Natural history and method of controlling the starfish (Asterias forbesi). Bull. Bur. Fish. Wash.49, 73–132.
Hancock, D. A., 1955. The feeding behaviour of starfish on Essex oyster beds. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K.34, 313–331.
—— 1958. Notes on starfish on an Essex oyster bed. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K.37, 565–589.
Hatanaka, M. & Kosaka, M., 1959. Biological studies on the population of the starfish,Asterias amurensis, in Sendai Bay. Tohoku J. agric. Res.4, 159–178.
Kowalski, R., 1955. Untersuchungen zur Biologie des SeesternsAsterias rubens L. in Brackwasser. Kieler Meeresforsch.11, 201–213.
Kühlmorgen-Hille, G., 1965. Qualitative und quantitative Veränderungen der Bodenfauna der Kieler Bucht in den Jahren 1953–1965. Kieler Meeresforsch.21, 167–191.
Loosanoff, V. L., 1958. Underwater studies of starfish behavior and evaluation of control methods. Bull. Biol. Lab., Milford22 (4), 1–5.
Muus, B. J., 1967. The fauna of Danish estuaries and lagoons. Meddr. Danm. Fisk. -og Havunders.5, 1–316.
Paine, R. T., 1976. Size-limited predation: an observational and experimental approach with theMytilus-Pisaster interaction. Ecology57, 858–873.
Rogal, U., Anger, K., Schriever, G. & Valentin, C. Quantitative macrobenthos studies in Lübeck Bay (western Baltic Sea). Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters. (in press).
Schulz, S., 1969. Das Makrobenthos der südlichen Beltsee (Mecklenburger Bucht und angrenzende Seegebiete). Beitr. Meeresk.26, 21–46.
Smith, G. F. M., 1940. Factors limiting distribution and size in the starfish. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can.5, 84–103.
Spärck, R., 1932. On the capability of migration of adult individuals ofAsterias rubens. Rep. Dan. biol. Stn.37, 65–68.
Thorson, G., 1957. Bottom communities. In: Treatise on marine ecology and paleoecology. Ed. by J. W. Hedgpeth. Geol. Soc. Am., New York,1, 461–534. (Mem. geol. Soc. Am.67.)
—— 1958. Parallel level-bottom communities, their temperature adaptation, and their “balance” between predators and food animals. In: Perspectives in marine biology. Ed. by A. A. Buzzati-Traverso. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley, 67–86.
—— 1964. Light as an ecological factor in the dispersal and settlement of larvae of marine bottom invertebrates. Ophelia1, 167–208.
Tortonese, E., 1963. Differenziazone geografica e superspecie nel genereAsterias (Echinodermata). Monit. zool. ital.70–71, 212–221.
Yoshida, M., 1966. Photosensitivity. In: Physiology of Echinodermata. Ed. by R. A. Boolootian. Interscience Publs., New York, 435–464.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anger, K., Rogal, U., Schriever, G. et al. In-situ investigations on the echinodermAsterias rubens as a predator of soft-bottom communities in the western Baltic Sea. Helgolander Wiss. Meeresunters 29, 439–459 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01609982
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01609982