Abstract
Transsexuals, because of their attempts at gender reversal, offer a unique opportunity to study self-presentation, social roles, and stereotypes. The present study is a content analysis of personal advertisements of male-to-female transsexuals (TM, N =99), homosexual (HoM, N =64) and heterosexual men (HM, N =99), and heterosexual women (HW, N =99). Advertisements were coded for the presence or absence of 11 characteristics either offered or sought, based on the 1984 work of Deaux and Hanna. The content of TM personal advertisements was significantly different from those of HW, HM, or HoM. TM mentioned physical characteristics and sincerity, and requested friendship most often; HoM mentioned sexuality most often; HM offered financial security and status in the form of occupation, and listed marital status most often; and HW offered personality characteristics and attractiveness most often. Several factors may contribute to the pattern of differences observed, including the fact that TM were more likely to be seeking friendship than sexual partners, in contrast to the other three groups.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bailey, J. M., Gaulin, S., Agyei, Y., & Gladue, B. (1994). Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionary relevant aspects of human mating psychology.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1081–1093.
Bell, A. P., & Weinberg, M. S. (1978).Homosexualities: A study of diversity among men and women. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Blanchard, R., McConkey, J. G., Roper, V., & Steiner, B. W. (1983). Measuring physical aggressiveness in heterosexual, homosexual, and transsexual males.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 12, 511–524.
Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1991). Intimate relationships and the creation of sexuality. In Kramer, L. (Ed.),The Sociology of Gender. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Brems, C., Adams, R. L., & Skillman, G. D. (1993). Person drawings by transsexual clients, psychiatric clients, and nonclients compared: Indicators of sex-typing and pathology.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 22, 253–264.
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.
Deaux, K., & Hanna, R. (1984). Courtship in the personals column: The influence of gender and sexual orientation.Sex Roles, 19, 131–142.
Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the paternal investment model.Psychological Bulletin, 122, 125–139.
Gonzales, M. H., & Meyers, S. A. (1993). “Your mother would like me:” Self-presentation in the personal ads of heterosexual and homosexual men and women.Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 19, 131–142.
Greenlees, I. A., & McGrew, W. C. (1994). Sex and age differences in preferences and tactics of mate attraction: Analysis of published advertisements.Ethology and Sociobiology, 15, 59–72.
Jankowiak, W. R., Hill, E. M., & Donovan, J. M. (1992). The effects of sex and sexual orientation on attractiveness judgments: An evolutionary interpretation.Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 73–85.
Johnson, S. L., & Hunt, D. D. (1990). The relationship of male transsexual typology to psychosocial adjustment.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19, 349–360.
Kenrick, D. J., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies.Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–133.
Koestner, R., & Wheeler, L. (1988). Self-presentation in personal advertisements: Influences of implicit notions of attraction and role expectations.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 5, 149–160.
Laner, M. R., & Kamel, L. G. (1977). Media mating I: Newspaper personal ads of homosexual men.Journal of Homosexuality, 3, 149–162.
Lynn, M., & Shurgot, B. A. (1984). Responses to lonely heart advertisements: Effects of reported physical attractiveness, physique, and coloration.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 349–357.
Rajecki, D. W., Bledsoe, S. B., & Rasmussen, J. L. (1991). Successful personal ads: Gender differences and similarities in offers, stipulations, and outcomes.Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 457–469.
Smith, J. E., Waldorf, A. V., & Trembath, D. L. (1990). “Single White male looking for thin, very attractive ⋯”Sex Roles, 23, 675–685.
Sprecher, S., Sullivan, Q., & Hatfield, E. (1994). Mate selection preferences: Gender differences examined in a national sample.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 1074–1080.
Symons, D. (1979).The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University.
Thiessen, D., Young, R. K., & Burroughs, R. (1993). Lonely hearts advertisements reflect sexually dimorphic mating strategies.Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 209–229.
Wiederman, M. W. (1993). Evolved gender differences in mate preferences: Evidence from personal advertisements.Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 331–351.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Child, M., Graff Low, K., McDonell McCormick, C. et al. Personal advertisements of male-to-female transsexuals, homosexual men, and heterosexuals. Sex Roles 34, 447–455 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01547812
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01547812