Abstract
An experiment was conducted to determine if behavior that deviated from gender stereotypes during initial interaction produced less positive perceptions of a target than did behavior conforming to stereotype. Thirty-seven males and 38 females (targets) were randomly assigned to conditions where they either enacted a behavior stereotypical to their gender or engaged in a behavior departing from the stereotype during initial interaction with a randomly assigned different-gender stranger (perceiver). All of the participants were raised in the United States. The majority of participants were Caucasian, approximately 30% of the participants were Hispanic. The participants were predominantly middle class. The gender stereotypical condition required the female target to ask questions and the male target to talk about himself during the interaction. A second condition required male and female targets to do the reverse (female tell and male ask). Following the interaction perceivers completed measures of positive affect and social attractiveness. The results indicated that perceptions of targets engaging in behavior opposite of gender stereotypes depend on the perceiver's level of gender-schematicity. The level of gender schematicity indicates a person's tendency to depend on traditional gender stereotypes. While schematics tended to feel less positively or no differently during interactions with gender opposite versus gender norm targets, they tended to evaluate the gender opposite target as more or no differently socially attractive than gender norm targets. Results also suggest that men may have more latitude to engage in gender opposite behaviors than do women.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allen, B. P. (1995). Gender stereotypes are not accurate: A replication of Martin (1987) using diagnostic vs. self-report and behavioral criteria.Sex Roles, 32 583–600.
Anderson, S. M., & Bem, S. L. (1981). Sex typing and androgyny in dyadic interaction: Individual differences in response to physical attractiveness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41 74–86.
Aries, E. (1987). Gender and communication. In P. Shaver & C. Hendrick (Eds.),Sex and Gender (pp. 124–148). Newbury Park CA: Sage.
Bem, S. L. (1981).The Bem Sex-Role Inventory: A professional manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Berger, C. R. (1979). Beyond initial interaction: Uncertainty, understanding, and the development of interpersonal relationships. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.),Language and social psychology (pp. 122–144). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Berger, C. R., & Bradac, J. J. (1982).Language and social knowledge: Uncertainty reduction in interpersonal relations. London: Edward Arnold.
Bierhoff, H.-W. (1989).Person perception and attribution. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Bradley, P. H. (1981). The folk-linguistics of women's speech: An empirical examination.Communication Monographs, 48 73–90.
Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1988). Nonverbal expectancy violations theory: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors.Communication Monographs, 55 58–79.
Burgoon, M., Birk, T. S., Hall, J. R. (1991). Compliance and satisfaction with physician-patient communication: An expectancy theory interpretation of gender differences.Human Communication Research, 18 177–208.
Burgoon, M., & Miller, G. R. (1985) An expectancy interpretation of language and persuasion. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.),Recent advances in language communication and social psychology (pp. 199–229). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Canary, D. J., & Hause, K. S. (1993). Is there any reason to research sex differences in communication?Communication Quarterly, 41 129–144.
Cappella, J. N., & Greene, J. O. (1982). A discrepancy-arousal explanation of mutual influence in expressive behavior for adult and infant-adult interaction.Communication Monographs, 49 89–114.
Costrich, N., Feinstein, J., Kidder, L., Marecek, J., & Pascale, L. (1975). When stereotypes hurt: Three studies of penalties for sex-role reversals.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11 520–530.
Davis, J. D. (1978). When boy meets girl: Sex roles and the negotiation of intimacy in an acquaintance exercise.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36 684–692.
Deaux, K. (1977). Sex differences. In T. Blass (Ed.),Personality variables in social behavior (pp. 357–377). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: An interactive model of gender-related behavior.Psychological Review, 94 369–389.
Derlega, V., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. T. (1993).Self disclosure. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Derlega, V., Winstead, B., Wong, P., & Hunter, S. (1985). Gender effects in an initial encounter: A case where men exceeded women in disclosure.Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2 25–44.
Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 112 106–124.
Douglas, W. (1990). Uncertainty, information-seeking, and liking during initial interaction.Western Journal of Speech Communication, 54 66–81.
Eagly, A. H. (1987).Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Fishman, P. M. (1978). Interaction: The work women do.Social Problems, 25 397–406.
Frable, D. E. S. (1989). Sex typing and gender ideology: Two facets of the individual's gender psychology that go together.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56 95–108.
Goffman, E. (1963).Stigma. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Harding, S. (1975). Women and words in a Spanish village. In R. Reiter (Ed.),Toward an anthropology of women. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Holsti, O. R. (1968). Content analysis. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.),The handbook of social psychology. (vol. 3, pp. 596–692). Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
Jones, E. E., & McGillis, D. (1976). Correspondent inferences and the attribution cube: A comparative reappraisal. In J. H. Harvey, W. J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.)New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 389–420). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Jussim, L., Coleman, L. M., & Lerch, L. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 536–546.
Lakoff, R. (1975).Language and women's place. New York: Harper & Row.
Lockheed, M. E., & Hall, K. P. (1976). Conceptualizing sex as a status characteristics: Applications to leadership training strategies.Journal of Social Issues, 32 111–124.
Martin, C. L. (1987). A ratio measure of sex stereotyping.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 489–499.
McCloskey, L. A. (1987). Gender and conversation: Mixing and matching styles. In D. B. Carter (Ed.),Current conceptions of sex roles and sex typing: Theory and research (pp. 139–153).
McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1974). The measurement of interpersonal attraction.Speech Monographs, 41 261–266.
McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1979).The reliability and validity of scales for the measurement of interpersonal attraction and homophily. Paper presented at the Eastern Communication Association Convention, Philadelphia.
McKenzie-Mohr, D., & Zanna, M. P. (1990). Treating women as sexual objects: Look to the (gender-schematic) male who has viewed pornography.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16 296–308.
McKinney, D. H., & Donaghy, W. C. (1993). Dyad gender structure, uncertainty reduction, and self-disclosure during initial interaction. In P. J. Kalbfleisch (Ed.),Interpersonal communication: Evolving interpersonal relationships (pp. 33–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Park, B., & Hahn, S. (1988). Sex-role identity and the perception of others.Social Cognition, 6 61–87.
Petronio, S., Martin, J., & Littlefield, R. (1984). Prerequisite conditions for self-disclosure: A gender issue.Communication Monographs, 51 268–273.
Sadalla, E. K., Kenrick, D. T., & Vershure, B. (1987). Dominance and heterosexual attraction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52 730–738.
Schneider, D. J., Hastorf, A. H., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1979).Person perception (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Smith-Lovin, L., & Robinson, D. T. (1992). Gender and conversational dynamics. In C. L. Ridgeway (Ed.),Gender, interaction, and inequality (pp. 122–156). NY: Springer-Verlag.
Skrypnek, B. J., & Snyder, M. (1982). On the self-perpetuating nature of stereotypes about women and men.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18 277–291.
Spence, J. T. (1991). Gender-related traits and gender: Evidence for a multifactorial theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64 624–635.
Spender, D. (1980).Man made language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Stokes, J., Childs, L., & Fuehrer (1981). Gender and sex roles as predictors of self-disclosure.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28 510–514.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scale.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54 1063–1070.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lindsey, A.E., Zakahi, W.R. Women who tell and men who ask: Perceptions of men and women departing from gender stereotypes during initial interaction. Sex Roles 34, 767–786 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544315
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544315