Abstract
This study investigated women's reactions to hypothetical male sexual advances and how these reactions are influenced by the physical attractiveness of the initiator. The 144 mostly Caucasian female participants were given vignettes asking them to imagine themselves as the recipients of an uninvited sexually coercive advance from a casual male acquaintance. The acquaintance was described as either attractive or unattractive, and the level of sexual coercion was low, medium, or high. Participants evaluated the situation in terms of how negatively or positively it would affect them, how socially acceptable it would be, and how much it would flatter them. The results indicate that for women, as has previously been shown for men, the attractiveness level of the opposite gender perpetrator redefines how the sexual advances are perceived. In addition, the results support earlier findings that women view sexual advances which use low levels of sexual coercion less negatively than those employing higher levels.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baier, J. L., Rosenzweig, M. G, & Whipple, E. G. (1991). Patterns of sexual behavior, coercion, and victimization of university students.Journal of College Student Development, 32 310–322.
Barocas, R., & Karoly, P. (1972). Effects of physical appearance on social responsiveness.Psychological Reports, 31 495–500.
Chaiken, S. (1979). Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37 1387–1397.
Christopher, F. S. (1988). An initial investigation into a continuum of premarital sexual pressure.The Journal of Sex Research, 25 255–266.
Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster (Hatfield), E. (1972). What is beautiful is good.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24 285–290.
Jones, W. H., Hansson, R. O., & Phillips A. L. (1978). Physical attractiveness and judgments of psychopathology.The Journal of Social Psychology, 105 79–84.
Kanin, E. J., & Parcell, S. R. (1977). Sexual aggression: A second look at the offended female.Archives of Sexual Behavior, 6 67–76.
O'Sullivan, L. F., & Byers, E. S. (1992). College students' incorporation of initiator and restrictor roles in sexual dating interactions.Journal of Sex Research, 29 435–446.
Ogletree, R. J. (1993). Sexual coercion experience and help-seeking behavior of college women.Journal of American College Health, 41 149–153.
Sigall, H., & Landy, D. (1973). Radiating beauty: Effects of having a physically attractive partner on person perception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28 218–224.
Struckman-Johnson, C. J., & Struckman-Johnson, D. L. (1991). Men and women's acceptance of coercive sexual strategies varied by initiator gender and couple intimacy.Sex Roles, 25 661–676.
Struckman-Johnson, C. J., & Struckman-Johnson, D. L. (1993). College men's and women's reactions to hypothetical sexual touch varied by initiator gender and coercion level.Sex Roles, 29 371–385.
Struckman-Johnson, C. J., & Struckman-Johnson, D. L. (1994). Men's reactions to hypothetical female sexual advances: A beauty bias in response to sexual coercion.Sex Roles, 31 387–405.
Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4 508–516.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cartar, L., Hicks, M. & Slane, S. Women's reactions to hypothetical male sexual touch as a function of initiator attractiveness and level of coercion. Sex Roles 35, 737–750 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544089
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544089