Abstract
Volunteer characteristics and volunteer rates across several laboratory experiments of sexual arousal were compared. Conditions were created to assess which component of the experimental setting was responsible for low volunteer rates in experiments using genital measurement. Subjects were 324 male and 424 female undergraduate students who had volunteered for an experiment on sexuality and personality. After completing several measures of sexual experience and attitude, subjects received a written description of one of the following conditions and were asked if they wished to volunteer: (1) sexual film, (2) sexual film and subjective rating of arousal, (3) sexual film and assessment through forehead temperature, (4) sexual film and assessment with a device that was placed over the clothes and measured genital heat flow, (5) sexual film and assessment with the heat flow device while partially undressed, or (6) sexual film and assessment with the vaginal photoplethysmograph or penile strain gauge while partially undressed. Men were significantly more likely to volunteer than women, and volunteer rates for both men and women decreased significantly when and only when subjects were required to undress. Multivariate analyses of variance revealed that both male and female volunteers were more sexually experienced, reported more exposure to erotic materials, and worried less about their sexual performance than nonvolunteers. No differences in volunteer characteristics occurred across the increasingly intrusive conditions for women while a few differences occurred for men. The present findings suggest that researchers should be cautious about discussing the generality of findings of studies involving exposure to a sexually explicit film alone as well as of experiments that involve self-report or physiological measures of sexual arousal.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abramson, P. R., Perry, L. B., Seeley, T. T., Seeley, D. B., and Rothblatt, A. B. (1981). Thermographic measurement of sexual arousal. A discriminant validity analysis.Arch. Sex. Behav. 10: 171–176.
Baker, W. J., and Perlman, D. (1975). Volunteer bias and personality traits in sexual standards research.Arch. Sex. Behav. 4: 161–171.
Barlow, D. H., Becker, R., Leitenberg, H., and Agras, W. S. (1970). A mechanical strain gauge for recording penile circumference change.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 6: 355–367.
Bentler, P. M. (1968a). Heterosexual behavior assessment. I. Males.Behav. Res. Ther. 6: 21–25.
Bentler, P. M. (1968b). Heterosexual behavior assessment. II. Females.Behav. Res. Ther. 6: 27–30.
Farkas, G. M., Sine, L. F., and Evans, I. M. (1978). Personality, sexuality, and demographic differences between volunteers and nonvolunteers for a laboratory study of male sexual behavior.Arch. Sex. Behav. 7: 513–520.
Fisher, W. A., and Byrne, D. (1978). Sex differences in response to erotica? Love versus lust.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 36: 117–125.
Griffit, W., and Kaiser, D. L. (1978). Affect, sex guilt, gender and the rewarding effects of erotic stimuli.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 36: 850–858.
Heiman, J. R. (1977). A psycho-physiological exploration of sexual arousal patterns in females and males.Psychophysiology 14: 266–274.
Henson, D. E., Rubin, H. B., Henson, C., and Williams, J. R. (1977). Temperature change of the labia minora as an objective measure of human female eroticism.J. Behav. Ther. Exper. Psychiat. 8: 401–410.
Hummel, T. J., and Sligo, J. R. (1977). Empirical comparison of univariate and multivariate analysis of variance procedures.Psychol. Bull. 76: 49–57.
Kaats, G. R., and Davis, K. E. (1971). Effects of volunteer biases in studies of sexual behavior and attitude.J. Sex Res. 7: 26–34.
Kenrick, D. T., Stringfield, D. O., Wagenhals, W. L., Dahl, R. H., and Ransdell, H. J. (1980). Sex differences, androgyny, and approach responses to erotica: A new variation on the old volunteer problem.J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 38: 517–524.
Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., and Martin, C. (1948).Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., Martin, C., and Gebhard, P. (1953).Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
Olson, C. L. (1976). On choosing a test statistic in multivariate analysis of variance.Psychol. Bull. 83: 579–586.
Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. L. (1975).The Volunteer Subject. Wiley, New York.
Schmidt, G. (1975). Male-female differences in sexual arousal and behavior during and after exposure to sexually explicit stimuli.Arch. Sex Behav. 4: 353–364.
Schmidt, G., and Sigusch, V. (1973). Women's sexual arousal. In Zubin, J., and Money, J. (eds.),Contemporary Sexual Behavior: Critical Issues in the 1970's. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Sintchak, G., and Geer, J. (1975). A vaginal photoplethysmograph system.Psychophysiology 12: 113–115.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., and Stapp, J. (1974). The personality attributes questionnaire: A measure of sex role stereotypes and masculinity and femininity.Journal Supplement Abstract Service Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 4: 43.
Wincze, J. P., and Caird, W. K. (1976). The effects of systematic desensitization and video desensitization in the treatment of essential sexual dysfunction in women.Behav. Ther. 7: 335–392.
Wolchik, S. A., Spencer, S. L., and Lisi, I. S. (1983). Volunteer bias in research employing vaginal measures of sexual arousal: Demographic, sexual and personality characteristics.Arch. Sex Behav. 12: 399–408.
Zuckerman, M. (1971). Dimensions of sensation seeking.J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 36: 45–52.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wolchik, S.A., Braver, S.L. & Jensen, K. Volunteer bias in erotica research: Effects of intrusiveness of measure and sexual background. Arch Sex Behav 14, 93–107 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541656
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01541656