Abstract
Nondirectiveness is the generally required and professed standard for genetic counseling. However, studies are lacking in the field of human genetics and in other disciplines which address either the theory or practice of this type of therapeutic procedure in the context of genetic counseling. Moreover, there is no indication the further development this concept has undergone in client-centered therapy has been acknowledged in human genetics. This could be due tot he historical development of genetic counseling, its inherent conflicts and often undefined goals, and the latent need of human geneticists to defend themselves against being accused of eugenic tendencies. Nondirectiveness and directiveness, however, can neither adequately describe what takes place in genetic counseling, nor can they — according to their original meaning — be used to define an ethical standard of genetic counseling. Starting with the writings by Carl Rogers (1942), an experiential approach is described, in which counseling is seen as a process of influence, which is wished by all the persons involved, during which activities are oriented toward the experience of the client, and which allows the counselor to communicate openly and directly with the client. The present study illustrates the use of the experiential approach in genetic counseling and shows that it can uphold the principle of ethics, which nondirectiveness demands and, at the same time, prevent the inevitable and unresolvable contradictions. This means that in their training genetic counselors must learn to recognize and constantly reflect on the influence they can and want to exert. In order to be able to use this influence in a responsible manner, genetic counselors must also learn to have a certain degree of flexibility so that they are able to check at any time how their client responds to this influence.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arnos KS, Israel J, Cunningham M (1991) Genetic counseling of the deaf. Medical and cultural considerations.Ann NY Acad Sci 630:212–222.
Bayer R (1990) AIDS and the future of reproductive freedom.Milbank Quart 68(Suppl) 2:179–204.
Brondum-Nielsen K (1992) Genetic counseling. Past time, present time, future.Ugeskrift Laeger 154(52):3747–3753.
Burke BM (1992) Genetic counselor attitudes towards fetal sex identification and selective abortion.Soc Sci Med 34:1263–1269.
Clarke A (1991) Is non-directive genetic counseling possible?Lancet II:998–1001.
Czeisel E (1981) Evaluation of information-guidance genetic counseling.J Med Genet 18:91–98.
Czeizel E (1990) The practice of genetic counseling.Orvosi Hetilap 131:2239–2244.
Editorial (1982) Directive counselling.Lancet II:368-369.
Evers-Kiebooms G, van den Berghe H (1979) Impact of genetic counseling: A review of published follow-up studies.Clin Genet 15:465–474.
Franklin G (1990) The multiple meanings of neutrality.J Am Psychoanal Assoc 38:195–220.
Frets PG, Duivenvoorden HJ, Verhage F, Niermeijer MF, van den Berghe SMM, Galjaard H (1990) Factors influencing the reproductive decision after genetic counseling.Am J Med Genet 35:496–502.
Fuhrmann W, Vogel F (1982)Genetische Familienberatung. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Garber AP, Hixon HE (1990) Prenatal genetic counseling.Clin Perinatol 17:749–759.
Gendlin ET (1970) A short summary and some long predictions. In: Hart JT, Tomlinson TM (eds)New Directions in Client-Centered Therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, pp 547–549.
Gendlin ET (1974) Client-centered and experiential psychotherapy. In: Wexler DA, Rice LN (eds)Innovations in Client-Centered Therapy. New York: Wiley, pp 211–246.
Gendlin ET, Zimring F (1955) The Qualities or Dimensions of Experiencing and Their Change. Counseling Center Discussion Papers I,3, Chicago.
Headings VE (1975) Alternative models of counseling for genetic disorders.Soc Biol 22:297–303.
Hsia YE, Hirschhorn K (1979) What is genetic counseling. In: Hsia YE, Hirschhorn K, Silverberg RL, Godmilow L (eds)Counseling in Genetics. New York: Liss, pp 1–29.
Kafka F (1966) Ein Landarzt. In:Er. Prosa von Franz Kafka. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, p 76.
Kessler S (1989) Psychological aspects of genetic counseling: IV. A critical review of the literature dealing with education and reproduction.Am M Med Genet 34:340–353.
Kessler S (1990) Current psychological issues in genetic counseling.J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 11:5–18.
Kessler S (1992) Psychological aspects of genetic counseling. VII. Thoughts on directiveness.J Genet Counsel 1:9–17.
Lippman-Hand A, Fraser FC (1979a) Genetic counseling: Provision and reception of information.Am J Med Genet 3:113–127.
Lippman-Hand A, Fraser FC (1979b) Genetic counseling — The postcounseling period: I. Parents perception of uncertainty.Am J Med Genet 4:51–71.
Lippman-Hand A, Fraser FC (1979c) Genetic counseling — The postcounseling period: II. Making reproductive choices.Am J Med Genet 4:73–87.
Litaer G (1992) Von “nicht-direktiv” zu “erfahrungsorientiert”: Über die zentrale Bedeutung eines Kernkonzepts. In: Sachse R, Litaer G, Stiles W (Hrsg)Neue Handlungskonzepte der Klientenzentrierten Psychotherapie. Heidelberg: Roland Asanger Verlag, S 11–21.
Mertens W (1993) Die psychoanalytische Haltung. In: Ermann M (Hrsg)Die hilfreiche Beziehung in der Psychoanalyse. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht, pp 15–16.
Reed S (1974) A short history of genetic counseling.Soc Biol 21:332–339.
Reif M, Baitsch H (1986)Genetische Beratung. Hilfestellung für eine selbst-verantwortliche Entscheidung? Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer.
Rogers CR (1942)Counseling and Psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Rogers CR (1951)Client-Centered Therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Seller MJ (1982) Ethical aspects of genetic counselling.J Med Ethics 8:185–188.
Sorenson JR, Swazey JP, Scotch NO (1981) Reproductive pasts, reproductive futures: Genetic counseling and its effectiveness.Birth Def Orig Art Ser XVII/4: 1–144.
Truax CB, Carkhuff RR (1967)Toward Effective Counseling and Psychotherapy: Training and Practice. Chicago.
Truax CB, Carkhuff RR, Kodman F (1965) Relationship between therapist-offered conditions and patient change in group psychotherapy.J Clin Psychol 21:327–329.
Wertz DC (1989) The 19-nation survey; Genetics and ethics around the world. In: Wertz DC, Fletcher JC (eds)Ethics and Human Genetics. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, pp 1–79.
Wertz D, Fletcher JC (1988) Attitudes of genetic counselors: A multinational survey.Am J Hum Genet 42:592–600.
Wertz D, Fletcher JC (1989a)Ethics and Human Genetics. A Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
Wertz D, Fletcher JC (1989b) Ethics and genetics: An international survey.Hastings Center Rep 19:20–24.
Wertz DC, Sorensen JR, Heeren TC (1988) Communication in health professional-lay encounters: How often does each party know what the other wants to discuss. In: Ruben BD (ed) Information and Behavior (Vol 2). New Brunswick, NY: Transaction Books, pp 329–342.
Wertz D, Fletcher JC, Mulvihill JJ (1990) Medical geneticists confront ethical dilemmas: cross cultural comparisons among 18 nations.Am J Hum Genet 46:1200–1213.
Yarborough M, Scott JA, Dixon LK (1989) The role of beneficence in clinical genetics: Nondirective counseling reconsidered.Theoret Med 10:139–149.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wolff, G., Jung, C. Nondirectiveness and genetic counseling. J Genet Counsel 4, 3–25 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01423845
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01423845