Abstract
This article examines whether a biased starting position impacts the outcome of negotiations using a Single Negotiating Text (SNT) (Raiffa 1982) type, two-party mediation. Two separate experiments were conducted, one in Helsinki and one in New Mexico, that systematically tested this issue and related questions. The article argues that, if a biased starting point is not compensated for by the path taken in subsequent steps, the bias will have considerable impact on the final outcome of the negotiations. In both experiments, the mediator played a very insignificant role, since the bias was incorporated into the text prior to the initiation of the exercise. In actuality, the experimenter played the role of the mediator, but only facilitated an exchange of information between the parties. The results of our experiments strongly support the hypothesis that such bias has a significant impact on the outcome of the negotiations. The article concludes by presenting suggestions for developing starting SNTs.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bazerman M. (1983). “Negotiator Judgment: A Critical Look at the Rationality Assumption.”American Behavioral Scientist 27, 211–228.
Fisher, R., and W. Ury. (1981).Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In: Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,”Econometrica 47, 263–291.
Kersten, G., W. Michalowski, S. Szpakowicz, and Z. Koperczak. (1991). “Restructurable Representations of Negotiation,”Management Science 37, 1267–1290.
Raiffa, H. (1982).The Art and Science of Negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Raiffa, H. (1985). “Post-Settlement Settlements,”Negotiation Journal 1, 9–12.
Rubin, J., and F. Sander. (1991). “When Should We Use Agents? Direct Vs. Representative Negotiation.” In J. Breslin and J. Rubin (eds.),Negotiation Theory and Practice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Law School, Program on Negotiation Books.
Shakun, M. (1988).Evolutionary Systems Design. Oakland, CA: Holden Day.
Smith, W.P. (1985). “Effectiveness of the Biased Mediator”.Negotiation Journal 1, 363–372.
Smith, W.P. (1987). “Conflict and Negotiation: Trends and Emerging Issues,”Journal of Applied Social Psychology 17, 641–677.
Teich, J. (1991). “Decision Support for Negotiation.” Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, Department of Management Science and Systems.
Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. (1981). “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.”Science 211, 453–458.
Welton, G.L., and D.G. Pruitt. (1987). “The Mediation Process: The Effects of Mediator Bias and Disputant Power”,Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 13, 123–133.
Wittmer, J.M., P. Carnevale, and M. Walker. (1991). “General Alignment and Overt Support in Biased Mediation,”Journal of Conflict Resolution 35, 594–610.
Zartman, I.W., and S. Touval. (1985). “International Mediation: Conflict Resolution and Power Politics,”Journal of Social Issues 4, 27–45.
Zubek, J. M., D.G. Pruitt, R.S. Peirce, N.B. McGillicuddy, and H. Syna, (1992). “Disputant and Mediator Behaviors Affecting Short-term Success in Mediation,Journal of Conflict Resolution 36, 547–572.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Korhonen, P., Oretskin, N., Teich, J. et al. The impact of a biased starting position in a single negotiation text type mediation. Group Decis Negot 4, 357–374 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01409779
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01409779