Abstract
This paper investigates Australian academics' views about teaching by asking them about the aspects of their job they could contract to other. In particular, it contrasts the views of 26 academics the Humanities with those of 26 in the Social Sciences. The results showed no differences as a function of level of appointment or gender but a significant difference by teaching area: academics from the Social Sciences were more likely to approve in general the practice of ‘buying out’ time. When asked about contracting out specific aspects of teaching, the only area of difference was for marking (Social Sciences were more often in favour). In all other respects, the viewpoints expressed by academics from the Humanities and Social Sciences were very similar. Such approval was rarely given unconditionally, however. Concerns were expressed about the need to maintain some degree of supervision or responsibility for teaching. Academics agreed on their overall goals in teaching, on whether or not lecturing, tutorials and student consultation could be contracted to others and on the ideal amounts of time to spend on teaching, research, and administration. It is argued that this pattern of results is more likely to reflect a difference in implementation of goals rather than a difference in baseline ideas as a result of different cultures in the two teaching areas.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Becher, T. (1987). ‘The disciplinary shaping of the profession”, in Clark, B.R. (ed.),The Academic Profession. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 271–303.
Biglan, A. (1973). ‘The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas”,Jornal of Applied Psychology 57, 195–203.
Blackburn, R.T., Lawrence, J.H., Bieber, J.P. and Trautvetter (1991). ‘Faculty at work: Focus on teaching’,Research in Higher Education 32, 363–381.
Elton, L. (1986). ‘Research and teaching: Symbiosis or conflict’,Higher Education 15, 299–304.
Everett, J.E. and Entrekin, L.V. (1994). ‘Changing attitudes of Australian academics’,Higher Education 27, 203–227.
Kerchner, C.T. and Mitchell, D.E. (1988).The Changing Idea of a Teachers' Union. New York: Falmer Press.
Moses, I. (1990). ‘Teaching, research and scholarship in different disciplines’,Higher Education 19, 351–375.
Nuemann, R. (1992). “Perceptions of the teaching-research nexus: A framework for analysis”Higher Education 23, 159–171.
Powell, J.P., Barrett, E. and Shanker, V. (1983). ‘How academics view their work”,Higher Education 12, 297–313.
Ramsden, P. and Moses, I. (1992). ‘Associations between research and teaching in Australian Higher education’,Higher Education 23, 273–295.
Samuelowicz, K. and Bain, J.D. (1992). ‘Conceptions of teaching held by academic teachers’,Higher Education 24, 93–111.
Stodolsky, S. (1988).The Subject Matters, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Warton, P.M., Goodnow, J.J. and Bowes, J.M. (1992). ‘Teaching as a form of work: Effects of teacher's roles and role definitions on working to rules’,Australian Journal of Education 36 (2), 170–180.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Warton, P.M. What parts of teaching do academics see as feasible to delegate?. High Educ 29, 129–141 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383835
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383835