Summary
When the larvae of the caddis flyApatania fimbriata (Pictet) are threatened, drops of fluid appear on their head capsules. The secretions are produced in a gland in the dorsal part of the prothorax. The neck region contains an eversible sac with numerous single setae, groups of 3 setae, or rows of setae on the surface. The secretion is released through two paris of orifices on the lateral sides of the sac. For the most part the secretion is composed of some 30 fatty acids, with the major components having 12–14 carbon atoms and up to 4 double bonds (approx. 1–2 µg secretion per specimen). Biotests with synthetic saturated acids (C6–C12) in a stream and in the laboratory demonstrated a paralysing effect on small invertebrate predators (Rhyacophila sp.,Plectrocnemia conspersa, Hydropsyche sp., larvae, all Trichoptera). In choice experiments,Rhyacophila sp. larvae preferred larvae ofAgapetus fuscipes andDrusus annulatus (Trichoptera) as food as compared withApatania fimbriata larvae. Larger predators, such asDinocras cephalotes (Insecta, Plecoptera) and the fishCottus gobio, did not discriminate betweenApatania fimbriata and other prey species. The use of fatty acids in defensive secretions is interpreted as an adaptation to the running water environment. They are effective repellents againstRhyacophila sp. larvae, the most important predator in the natural environment ofApatania larvae.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allan JD (1983) Predator-prey relationships in streams. Pp 191–229in JR Barnes and GW Minshall (eds) Stream Ecology: Application and Testing of General Ecological Theory. New York: Plenum Press
Allan JD, Flecker AS, McClintock NL (1987) Prey-preference of stoneflies: sedentaryvs mobile prey. Oikos 49:323–331
Aurich M (1989) Der Lebenszyklus vonApatania fimbriata Pictet im Breitenbach. Diploma Thesis, Universität Bremen
Blum MS (1981) Chemical Defense of Arthropods. New York: Academic Press
Blum MS (1987) Biosynthesis of arthropod exocrine compounds. Annu Rev Entomol 32:381–413
Chesson J (1978) Measuring preferecne in selective predation. Ecology 59:211–215
Chesson J (1983) The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging models. Ecology 64:1297–1304
Christie WW, Brechany EY, Holman RT (1987) Mass spectra of the picolinyl esters of isomeric mono- and dienoic acids. Lipids 22:224–228
Dettner K (1979) Chemotaxonomy of water beetles based on their pygidial gland constituents. Biochem System Ecol 7:129–140
Duffield RM (1981) 2-Nonanol in the exocrine secretion of the nearctic caddisfly,Rhyacophila fuscula (Walker) (Rhyacophilidae: Trichoptera). Proc ent Soc Wash 83:60–63
Duffield RM, Blum MS, Wallace JB, Lloyd HA, Regnier FE (1977) Chemistry of the defensive secretion of the caddis flyPycnosphyche scabripennis (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae). J Chem Ecol 3:649–656
Eltringham H (1919) On the histology of the scent-organs in the genusHydroptila, Dal. Trans R entomol Soc Lond 1919:420–430
Forsyth DJ (1968) The structure of the defense glands in Dytiscidae, Noteridae, Haliplidae and Gyrinidae (Coleoptera) Trans R ent Soc Lond 120:159–182
Gislason GM (1981) Predatory exclusion ofApatania zonella (Zett.) byPotamophylax cingulatus (Steph.) (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) in Iceland. Pp 93–98in G. P. Moretti (ed) Proc 3rd int Symp Trichoptera. The Hague: Junk
Harvey DJ (1982) Picolinyl esters as derivates for the structural determination of long chain branched and unsaturated fatty acids. Biomed Mass Spectrom 9:33–88
Hershey AE, Dodson SI (1987) Predator avoidance byCricotopus: cyclomorphosis and the importance of beeing big and hairy. Ecology 68:913–920
Kelner-Pillault S (1975) Attirance sexuelle chez un Trichoptère:Enoicyla pusilla Burmeister. Bull Soc ent Fr 80:252–257
Knöfel B (1983) Beiträge zu Biologie und Ernährungsbeziehungen einer carnivoren Insektenlarve,Rhyacophila fasciata Hagen 1859 (Trichoptera, Rhyacophilidae). Beitr Naturkde Osthessen 19:91–134
Leonhardt BA, DeVilbiss ED (1984) Separation and doublebond determination on nanogram quantities of aliphatic monounsaturated alcohols, aldehydes and carboxylic acid methyl esters. J Cromatogr 322:484–490
Mey W, Levanidova IM (1989) Revision der GattungApatania Mosely, 1936 (Trichoptera, Limnephilidae). Dtsch ent Z NF 36 (1–3):65–98
Mosely M. E. (1923) Scent-organs in the genusHydroptila (Trichoptera). Trans R Entomol Soc Lond 1923:291–294
Nislow KH (1991) Influence of case design and short-term case alteration on the vulnerability of larval Trichoptera to predation. Proc 6th int Symp Trichoptera, Lodz — Zakopane, in press
Peckarsky BL (1984) Predator-prey interactions among aquatic insects. Pp 196–254in Resh VH, Rosenberg DM The Ecology of Aquatic Insects. New York: Praeger
Peckarsky BL (1985) Do predaceous stoneflies and siltation affect the structure of stream insect communities colonizing enclosures? Can J Zool 63:1519–1530
Peckarsky BL (1987) Mayfly cerci as defense against stonefly predation: deflection and detection. Oikos 48:161–170
Peckarsky BL, Wilcox RS (1989) Stonefly nymphs use hydrodynamic cues to discriminate between prey. Oecologia (Berlin) 79:265–270
Resh VH, Wood JR (1985) Site of sex pheromone production in three species of Trichoptera. Aquatic Insects 7:65–71
Resh VH, Jackson JK, Wood JR (1987) Techniques for demonstrating sex pheromones in Trichoptera. Pp 161–164in Bournaud M, Tachet H (eds) Proc 5th int Symp Trichoptera. The Hague: Junk
Roemhild G (1980) Pheromone glands of microcaddisflies (Triohoptera: Hydroptilidae). J Morphol 163:9–12
Scrimshaw S, Herfoot SW (1987) Chemical defenses of freshwater organisms. Beetles and Bugs. Pp 240–262in Kerfoot SW Sih A (eds) Predation. Direct and Indirect Impacts on Aquatic Communities. Hannover and London: University Press of New England
Solem JO (1985) Female sex pheromones inRhyacophila nubila (Zetterstedt) (Trichoptera, Rhyacophilidae) and arrival patterns to sticky traps. Faun norv Ser B 32:80–82
Soluk DA, Collins NC (1988) Synergistic interactions between fish and stoneflies: facilitation and interference among stream predators. Oikos 52:94–100
Vincenti M, Giglielmetti G, Cassani G, Tonini C (1987) Determination of double bond position in diunsaturated compounds by mass spectrometry of dimethyl disulfide derivates. Anal Chem 59:694–699
Walde SJ, Davies RW (1985) Diel feeding periodicity of two predatory stoneflies (Plecoptera). Can J Zool 63:883–887
Warren PH, Lawton JH (1987) Invertebrate predatory-prey body size relationships: an explanation for upper triangular food webs and patterns in food web structure? Oecologia (Berlin) 74:231–235
Weber H, Weidner H (1974) Grundriβ der Insektenkunde, 5. Auflage Stuttgart, New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag
Williams DD (1987) A laboratory study of predator-prey interactions of stoneflies and mayflies. Freshw Biol 17:471–490
Wohlfarth-Bottermann KE (1957) Die Kontrastierung tierischer Zellen und Gewebe im Rahmen ihrer elektronenmikroskopischen Untersuchungen an ultradünnen Schnitten. Naturwissenschaften 44:287–288
Wood JR, Resh VH (1984) Demonstration of sex pheromones in caddis flies (Trichoptera). J Chem Ecol 10:171–175
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wagner, R., Aurich, M., Reder, E. et al. Defensive secretions from the larvae ofApatania fimbriata (Pictet) (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae). Chemoecology 1, 96–104 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01241650
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01241650