Abstract
Adaptive management is a policy framework within which an iterative process of decision making is followed based on the observed responses to and effectiveness of previous decisions. The use of adaptive management allows science-based research and monitoring of natural resource and ecological community responses, in conjunction with societal values and goals, to guide decisions concerning man's activities. The adaptive management process has been proposed for application to hydropower operations at Glen Canyon Dam on the Colorado River, a situation that requires complex balancing of natural resources requirements and competing human uses. This example is representative of the general increase in public interest in the operation of hydropower facilities and possible effects on downstream natural resources and of the growing conflicts between uses and users of river-based resources. This paper describes the adaptive management process, using the Glen Canyon Dam example, and discusses ways to make the process work effectively in managing downstream natural resources and biodiversity.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Literature Cited
Carothers, W., and B. T. Brown. 1991. The Colorado River through Grand Canyon: Natural history and human change. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona.
Carothers, S. W., and D. Wegner. No date. Adaptive management at Glen Canyon Dam and in the Grand Canyon: A management opportunity. Unpublished draft.
DOI (US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation). No date. Glen Canyon environmental studies, Phase II. Washington, DC, unpublished.
DOI (US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation). 1988. Glen Canyon environmental studies final report [phase I]. Washington, DC, 84 pp.
DOI (US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation). 1995. Operation of Glen Canyon Dam, Colorado River storage project, Arizona, final environmental impact statement. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 337 pp.
Lee, K. N., and J. Lawrence. 1986. Restoration under the Northwest Power Act; Adaptive management: Learning from the Columbia River Basin fish and wildlife program.Environmental Law 16:429–460.
NAS (National Academy of Sciences). 1991a. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: Science, technology and public policy. Washington, DC.
NAS (National Academy of Sciences). 1991b. Colorado River ecology and dam management. Washington, DC, 276 pp.
Sparks, R. E. 1995. Need for ecological management of large river-floodplain ecosystems.BioScience 46:168–182.
Woodbury, A. M. 1959. Ecological studies of flora and fauna in Glen Canyon. Glen Canyon series 7, Report no. 40. Department of Anthropology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wieringa, M.J., Morton, A.G. Hydropower, adaptive management, and Biodiversity. Environmental Management 20, 831–840 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205963
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01205963