Summary
The omnipresence of prosthetic materials (mesh) used in hernia repairs throughout the world deserves careful review. The propensity to develop operative techniques wherein prosthetic mesh is used routinely, regardless of type hernia, has reached an unacceptable level of practice. Being foreign bodies, postoperative complications occur which directly can be traced to the implanted meshes. Recent interest in mesh complications, i.e., infection, mesh shrinkage, migration and fistula formation, has escalated. Although mesh foreign body tumorigenesis has not been seen in humans following hernia repair, there is sufficient animal data to cause concern. Similarly, neural complications following use of mesh, particularly after the open anterior notension repair methods, are being reported at alarming rates. Many types of inguinal hernias do not need mesh repairs. It is our premise that these hernias must be identified preoperatively. Certainly, type I, II and III C inguinal hernias of our classification, should not receive a prosthetic mesh repair. If prosthetic mesh is to be used, it should be placed to buttress the inguinal wall posteriorly so that advantage of Pascal's law may be assured.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Amid PK (1997) Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 1: 15–21
Brand KG, Johnson KH, Buoen LC (1976) Foreign body tumorigenesis. CRC Crit Rev Toxicol 4: 353–394
Jennings TA, Peterson L, Axiotis CA, Friedlaender GE, Cooke RA, Rosai J (1988) Angiosarcoma associated with foreign body material: A report of three cases. Cancer 62: 2436–2444
Nyhus LM (1989) The recurrent groin hernia: Therapeutic solutions. World J Surg 13: 541–544
Nyhus LM (1993) Individualization of hernia repair: A new era. Surgery 114: 1–2
Nyhus LM, Patino J (1999) Non-mesh repair of femoral hernia. Operative techniques in general surgery 1: 132–141
O'Dwyer PF, et al. (MRC laparoscopic groin hernia group) (1999) Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: A randomized comparison. Lancet 354: 185–190
Pelissier EP, Blum D, Damas JM Marre P (1999) The plug method in inguinal hernia: A prospective evaluation. Hernia 4: 201–204
Read RC (1999) Francis C. Usher, herniologist of the twentieth century. Hernia 3: 167–171
Schumpelick V, Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B (2001) Biomaterials for the repair of abdominal wall hernia: Structural and compositat considerations.In Nyhus and Condon: Hernia 5th Ed editors: R Fitzgibbons and G Greenburg. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. In Press
Starling JR (1995) Genitofemoral neuralgia.In Hernia (4th ed). LM Nyhus and RE Condon. Philadelphia, JB Lippincott
Stoppa RE (1995) The preperitoneal approach and prosthetic repair of groin hernias.In Hernia (4th ed). LM Nyhus and RE Condon. Philadelphia, JB Lippincott
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nyhus, L.M. Ubiquitous use of prosthetic mesh in inguinal hernia repair: the dilemma. Hernia 4, 184–186 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01201062
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01201062