Abstract
Ninety female students in a general psychology class at the University of Missouri-Columbia volunteered to be exposed to pre- and posttests of ice water tolerance. They were divided into eight experimental groups in a 2 × 2 × 2 design and one attention-placebo control group. The main independent variables were imagery content (pleasant versus neutral scenes), choice of imagery content (choice versus yoked), and self-verbalization (SV) (preplanned explicit SV versus no SV). The two main dependent variables were changes from pre- to posttests in actual tolerance and in self-reported pain. After both pre- and posttests, subjects rated their involvement in imagery (percent of time spent in imagery and vividness of imagery). A three-way ANOVA revealed that for increases in tolerance, significant main effects were found for choice of content (choice greater than yoked) and for SV (SV greater than no SV). Imagery content (pleasant versus neutral) was not significant. No ANOVA interactions were significant. For decreases in selfreported pain the only significant effect was choice (choice greater than yoked). Only two experimental groups had greater changes in tolerance than the attention-placebo group; no group had greater changes in selfreported pain than the control group. For vividness of posttest imagery, pleasant imagery was greater than neutral imagery, choice was greater than yoked, and SV was greater than no SV. A measure of vividness of visual imagery, completed by subjects prior to their exposure to ice water, was a weak predictor of changes in tolerance and self-reported pain from pre- to posttests.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Note
Barber, T. X.Cognitive strategies and cognitive style: Some behavioral implications. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, August 1977.
References
Averill, J. R. Personal control over aversive stimuli and its relationship to stress.Psychological Bulletin 1973,80 286–303.
Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Towards a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review 1977,84 191–215.
Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change.Cognitive Therapy and Research 1977,1 287–308.
Bandura, A., Adams, N. E., & Beyer, J. Cognitive processes mediating behavioral change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1977,35 125–139.
Barber, T. X., & Cooper, B. J. Effects on pain of experimentally induced and spontaneous distraction.Psychological Reports 1972,31 647–651.
Beecher, H. K. Quantification of the subjective pain experience. In P. H. Hoch & J. Zubin (Eds.),Psychopathology of perception. Grune & Stratton, 1965.
Brown, R. A., Fader, K., & Barber, T. X. Responsiveness to pain: Stimulus specificity versus generality.Psychological Record 1973,23 1–7.
Chaves, J. F., & Barber, T. X. Cognitive strategies, experimenter modeling, and expectation in the attenuation of pain.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1974,83 356–363.
Corrah, N. L., & Boffa, J. Perceived control, self-observation, and response to aversive stimulation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1970,16 1–4.
Glass, D. C., Singer, J. E., & Friedman, L. N. Psychic cost of adaptation to an environmental stressor.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1969,12 200–210.
Grimm, L., & Kanfer, F. H. Tolerance of aversive stimulation.Behavior Therapy 1976,7 593–601.
Horan, J. J. “In vivo” emotive imagery: A technique for reducing childbirth anxiety and discomfort.Psychological Reports 1973,32 1328.
Horan, J. J. Coping with inescapable discomfort throughin vivo emotive imagery. In J. D. Krumboltz & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.),Counseling methods. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1976.
Horan, J. J., Layng, F. C., & Pursell, C. H. Preliminary study of effects of “in vivo” emotive imagery on dental discomfort.Perceptual and Motor Skills 1976,42 105–106.
Kanfer, F. H. The many faces of self-control, or behavior modification changes its focus. In R. B. Stuart (Ed.),Behavioral self-management: Strategies, techniques, and outcomes. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1977.
Kirk, R. E.Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, California: Brooks/Cole, 1968.
Know, V. J. Cognitive strategies for coping with pain: Ignoring versus acknowledging (Doctoral dissertation, University of Waterloo [Canada], 1972).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1973,34, 2308B.
Langer, E. J., Janis, I. L., & Wolfer, J. A. Reduction of psychological stress in surgical patients.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1975,11 155–165.
Lefcourt, H. M. The function of the illusions of control and freedom.American Psychologist 1973,28 417–425.
Levendusky, P., & Pankratz, L. Self-control techniques as an alternative to pain medication.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1975,84 165–168.
Marks, D. F. Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures.British Journal of Psychology 1973,64 17–24.
Meichenbaum, D., & Turk, D. The cognitive-behavioral management of anxiety, anger and pain. In P. Davidson (Ed.),Behavioral management of anxiety, depression and pain. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1976.
Neufeld, R. W. J. The effect of experimentally altered cognitive appraisal of pain tolerance.Psychonomic Science 1970,20 106–107.
Neufeld, R. W. J., & Davidson, P. O. The effects of vicarious and cognitive rehearsal on pain tolerance.Journal of Psychosomatic Research 1971,15 329–335.
Scott, D. S., & Barber, T. X. Cognitive control of pain: Effects of multiple cognitive strategies.Psychological Record 1977,2 373–383. (a)
Scott, D. S., & Barber, T. X. Cognitive control of pain: Four serendipitous results.Perceptual and Motor Skills 1977,44 569–570. (b)
Spanos, N. P., Horton, C., & Chaves, J. F. The effects of two cognitive strategies on pain threshold.Journal of Abnormal Psychology 1975,84 677–681.
Staub, E., Tursky, B., & Schwartz, G. Self-control and predictability: Their effects on reactions to aversive stimulation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1971,18 157–162.
Weisenberg, M. Pain and pain control.Psychological Bulletin 1977,84 1008–1044.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This article is based on a dissertation submitted to the University of Missouri, Columbia. The author gratefully acknowledges the help of his advisor, Robert H. Dolliver, and the assistance of Charles J. Krauskopf, Lois A. Huebner, C. Steven Richards, Terry D. TenBrink, and William F. Waters.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Worthington, E.L. The effects of imagery content, choice of imagery content, and self-verbalization on the self-control of pain. Cogn Ther Res 2, 225–240 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01185785
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01185785