Skip to main content
Log in

Socioenvironmental factors and development policy: Understanding opposition and support for offshore oil

  • Articles
  • Published:
Sociological Forum

Abstract

One of the difficulties of integrating environmental variables into sociological analyses is that societies have a dualistic relationship with the biophysical environment. Humans are like other species in depending on the environment, yet humans are also unique among all species in the potential for altering and sometimes evading environmental constraints. A second and related difficulty results from the degree to which humans incorporate the environment into their everyday views of reality; the process often seems so automatic that the biophysical realities can be forgotten, taken for granted, or ignored, both by residents and by those who study them. This problem is particularly significant for studies that fail to be sufficiently comparative to be able to observe significant variations in environmental and technological factors. The problem is illustrated with a study that deals with a relatively traditional social-psychological dependent variable—attitudes toward a proposed development. The focus is on the apparent paradox of a form of industrial development that has been welcomed with open arms in one area of the country while virtually opening armed warfare in another, namely drilling for offshore oil. To explain the marked differences across regions, it is necessary to understand the influence of biophysical and technological variables, as well as the social and historical differences across the regions. Implications for further research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berger, Peter L. andThomas Luckmann 1967 The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1986 “Sociology and the environment: The winding road toward human ecology.” International Social Science Journal 38(109):337–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987 “New directions in environmental sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 13:465–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttel, Frederick H. and Craig R. Humphrey 1987 “Sociological theory and the natural environment.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Chicago.

  • Catton, William R., Jr. 1980 Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Social Change. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1978 “Environmental sociology: A new paradigm.” The American Sociologist 13:41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1980 “A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology.” American Behavioral Scientist 24:15–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S. 1957 Community Conflict. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comeaux, Malcolm L. 1972 Atchafalaya Swamp Life: Settlement and Folk Occupations. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotgrove, Stephen 1982 Catastrophe or Cornucopia: The Environment, Politics and the Future. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, Thomas, Paul C. Stern andRobert W. Rycroft 1989 “Definitions of conflict and the legitimation of resources: The case of environmental risk.” Sociological Forum 4:47–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1987 “Polls, pollution, and politics revisited: Public opinion on the environment in the Reagan era.” Environment 29:6–11, 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1992 “Trends in public opinion toward environmental issues: 1965–1990.” In Riley E. Dunlap and Angela G. Mertig (eds.), American Environmentalism: The U.S. Environmental Movement, 1970–1990: 89–116. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1978 “Environmental sociology: A new paradigm.” The American Sociologist 13(Feb.):41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979a “Environmental sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology 5:243–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1979b “Environmental sociology: A framework for analysis.” In T. O'Riordan and R. C. d'Arge (eds.), Progress in Resources Management and Environmental Planning, Vol. 1:57–85. Chichester, England: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1983 “What environmental sociologists have in common (whether concerned with “built” or “natural” environments).” Sociological Inquiry 53:113–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, Riley E. andKenneth E. Martin 1983 “Bringing environment into the study of agriculture: Observations and suggestions regarding the sociology of agriculture.” Rural Sociology 48:201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, Riley E. andMarvin E. Olsen 1984 “Hard-path versus soft-path advocates: A study of energy activists.” Policy Studies Journal 13:413–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, Leon 1957 A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, Donald R. andWilliam R. Burch, Jr. 1991 Rural Sociology and the Environment. Second Edition. Middleton, WI: Social Ecology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenberg, Nicholas 1984 Not in Our Back Yards! Community-Action for Health and the Environment. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1985 “Succession and success: A new look at an old concept.” Sociological Spectrum 5:269–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1991 “Rural-urban differences in environmental concern: A closer look.” Sociological Inquiry 61:167–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1992 “Addictive economies: Extractive industries and vulnerable localities in a changing world economy.” Rural Sociology 56(4):610–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1993 “Risk and recreancy: Weber, the division of labor, and the rationality of risk perceptions.” Social Forces 71 (4, June):909–932.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, William R. andRodney K. Baxter 1984 “Host community attitudes toward nuclear power plants: A reassessment.” Social Science Quarterly 65:1129–1136.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1989 “The emergence of environmental sociology.” Sociological Inquiry 59:439–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1992a “Community impacts of technological change: Toward a longitudinal perspective.” Social Forces 70:937–955.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg, William R. and Robert Gramling 1992b “Bureaucratic slippage and the burden of proof: The case of the Environmental Studies Program.” Presented at Annual Meeting of Rural Sociological Society, State College, PA.

  • Freudenburg, William R. and Robert Gramling forthcoming Oil in Troubled Waters: Perceptions, Politics, and the Battle Over Offshore Oil. State University of New York Press.

  • Freudenburg, William R. andSusan K. Pastor 1992 “Public responses to technological risks: Toward a sociological perspective.” Sociological Quarterly 33:389–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallaway, B. J. 1984 “Assessment of platform effects on snapper populations and fisheries.” In Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Information Transfer Meeting: 130–137. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Interior/Minerals Management Service (MMS 85-0008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramling, Robert 1989 “Concentrated work scheduling: Enabling and constraining aspects.” Sociological Perspectives 32:47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramling, Robert andSarah Brabant 1986 “Boom towns and offshore energy impact assessment: The development of a comprehensive model.” Sociological Perspectives 29:177–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1990 “A closer look at ‘local control’: Communities, commodities, and the collapse of the coast.” Rural Sociology 55(4):541–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1992a “Opportunity-threat, development, and adaptation: Toward a comprehensive framework for social impact assessment.” Rural Sociology 57 (2, Summer): 216–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1992b “TheExxon Valdez oil spill in the context of U.S. petroleum energy politics.” Industrial Crisis Quarterly 6:175–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guterbock, Thomas M. 1990 “The effects of snow on urban density patterns in the United States.” Environment and Behavior 22:358–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heberlein, Thomas A. 1981 “Environmental attitudes.” Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik 4(Feb.):241–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, Craig R. andFrederick Buttel 1982 Environment, Energy and Society. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krannich, Richard S. andA. E. Luloff 1991 “Problems of resource dependency in U.S. rural communities.” Progress in Rural Policy and Planning 1:5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, Celene 1989 “Community struggles and the shaping of democratic consciousness.” Sociological Forum 4:277–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankford, Raymond L. 1971 “Marine drilling.” In J. E. Brantley (ed.), History or Oil Well Drilling: 1358–1444. Houston, TX: Gulf Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louisiana Department of Natural Resources 1991 “Outer continental shelf lease sales.” Louisiana Coast Lines (December Supplement):1–5.

  • Marx, Karl 1977 Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. (1867) (Ben Fowkes, tr.) New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, Roderick D. 1924 “The ecological approach to the study of the human community.” American Journal of Sociology 30:287–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Robert Cameron 1979 “Silent spring/solid majorities.” Public Opinion 55:1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohai, Paul 1990 “Black environmentalism.” Social Science Quarterly 71:744–765.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molotch, Harvey 1970 “Oil in Santa Barbara and power in America.” Sociological Inquiry 40:131–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan City Historical Society 1960 A History of Morgan City, Louisiana. Morgan City, LA: Morgan City Historical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Denton E. 1986 “How and why environmental consciousness has trickled down.” In Allan Schnaiberg, Nicholas Watts, and Klaus Zimmerman (eds.),Distributional Conflicts in Environmental-Resource Policy: 187–220. New York: St. Martin's.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council 1992 Assessment of the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Studies Program: III Socioeconomics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Robert E. 1936 “Human ecology.” American Journal of Sociology 42:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portney, Kent E. 1991 Siting Hazardous Waste Treatment Facilities: The NIMBY Syndrome. New York: Auburn House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg, Allan 1980 The Environment: From Surplus to Scarcity. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallings, E. F. 1984 “Development of OCS techniques.” In Robert Gramling and Sarah Brabant (eds.), The Role of Outer Continental Shelf Activities in the Growth and Modification of Louisiana's Coastal Zones: 1–26. Lafayette, LA: U.S. Department of Commerce/Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, University of Southwestern Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, David 1993 Personal communication with Robert Gramling, March 9.

  • Summers, Gene F., Sharon D. Evans, Frank Clemente, Elwood M. Beck, andJon Minkoff 1976 Industrial Invasion of Nonmetropolitan America: A Quarter Century of Experience. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, Andrew 1991 “In praise of Luddism: Strategic lessons from the hazardous waste wars.” Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 2:17–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census 1940 1940 Census of Population: Characteristics of the Population. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Minerals Management Service 1988 Current Facts and Figures: MMS Offshore Oil and Gas Operations Special Information Sheet. New Orleans, LA: Minerals Management Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1980 “The social bases of environmental concern: A review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence.” Public Opinion Quarterly 44:181–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • 1981 “Environmental concern—Does it make a difference how it's measured?” Environment and Behavior 13:651–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max 1958 The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1905) (tr. Talcott Parsons) New York: Scribner's Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freudenburg, W.R., Gramling, R. Socioenvironmental factors and development policy: Understanding opposition and support for offshore oil. Sociol Forum 8, 341–364 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115049

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01115049

Key words

Navigation