Abstract
Researchers attempting to understand the experience of subjective well-being have relied heavily on self-report measurement. Recent research focused on this method has demonstrated that a number of factors, such as the current mood of the respondent and the cognitive and social context surrounding the response, can significantly influence response to items inquiring about global subjective well-being or satisfaction with life. In the present study, several measurement strategies (e.g., single-item measures, multiple-item scales, and memory search tasks) were compared with regard to their susceptibility to such influences. Although some evidence for effects due to item-placement or transient mood were found, all of the global measures of subjective well-being and life satisfaction has significant convergence with peer-reports, and the single-item measures showed good temporal reliability across a one-month interval. The data provide evidence for a significant degree of stability in subjective well-being and life satisfaction.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allen, M. and Yen, W.: 1979, Introduction to Measurement Theory (Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA).
Andrews, F. M. and Withey, S. B.: 1976, Social Indicators of Well-Being: America's Perception of Life Quality (Plenum, New York).
Bargh, J. A.: 1989, ‘Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition’, in J. S. Uleman and J. A. Bargh (eds), Unintended Thought (The Guilford Press, New York).
Bargh, J. A. and Thein, R. D.: 1985, ‘Individual construct accessibility, person memory, and the recall-judgment link: The case of information overload’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49, 1129–1146.
Chaiken, S.: 1980, ‘Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39, 752–766.
Clark, M. S. and Isen, A. M.: 1982, ‘Toward understanding the relationship between feeling states and social behavior’, in A. H. Hastorf and A. M. Isen (eds), Cognitive Social Psychology (Elsevier, New York), pp. 73–108.
Costa, P. T. and McCrae, R. R.: 1980, ‘Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38, 668–678.
Cronbach, L. J.: 1960, Essentials of Psychological Testing (Harper & Brothers, New York) 2nd ed.
Diener, E.: 1984, ‘Subjective well-being’, Psychological Bulletin 95, 542–575.
Diener, E.: 1990, Challenges in measuring subjective well-being and ill-being, manuscript submitted for publication, University of Illinois.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., and Griffin, S.: 1985, ‘The satisfaction with life scale’, Journal of Personality Assessment 49, 71–75.
Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Pavot, W., and Gallagher, D.: 1991, ‘Response artifacts in the measurement of well-being’, Social Indicators Research 24, 35–56.
Emmons, R. A. and Diener, E.: 1985, ‘Personality correlates of subjective well-being’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 11, 89–97.
Eysenck, H. J. and Eysenck, S. B. G.: 1964, Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory (Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego, CA).
Fordyce, M. W.: 1977, The Happiness Measures: A sixty-second index of emotional well-being and mental health, unpublished manuscript, Edison Community College, Ft. Myers, Florida.
Glass, G. and Hopkins, K.: 1984, Statistical Methods in Education and Psychology (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).
Heady, B. and Wearing, A.: 1989, ‘Personality, life events, and subjective well-being: toward a dynamic equilibrium model’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57, 731–739.
Kammann, R. and Flett, R.: 1983, ‘Affectometer 2: A scale to measure current level of general happiness’, Australian Journal of Psychology 35, 257–265.
Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., and Sandvik, E.: 1991, ‘Further validation of the satisfaction with life scale: evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being measures’, Journal of Personality Assessment 57, 2–13.
Pavot, W., Diener, E., and Fujita, F.: 1990, ‘Extraversion and happiness’, Personality and Individual Differences 11, 1299–1306.
Schwarz, N. and Clore, G. L.: 1983, ‘Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: informative and directive functions of affective states’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45, 513–523.
Schwarz, N. and Strack, F.: 1991, ‘Evaluating one's life: A judgment model of subjective well-being’, in F. Strack, M. Argyle, and N. Schwarz (eds), Subjective Well-Being: An Interdisciplinary Approach (Pergamon, Oxford).
Strack, F., Martin, L. L., and Schwarz, N.: 1988, ‘Priming and communications: Social determinants of information use in judgments of life satisfaction’, European Journal of Social Psychology 18, 429–442.
Wessman, A. E. and Ricks, D. F.: 1966, Mood and Personality (Holt, New York).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pavot, W., Diener, E. The affective and cognitive context of self-reported measures of subjective well-being. Soc Indic Res 28, 1–20 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01086714
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01086714