Abstract
The propriety of psychological testimony concerning factors that influence eyewitness reliability has been challenged on the grounds that the research methods and populations used in eyewitness research may not generalize. The present experiment examines one aspect of the generalizability issue and tests whether a number of factors that have produced differential performance in college-age subject populations produce similar effects in older subject populations. Subjects ranging from 18 to 74 years of age viewed a videotaped reenactment of a robbery. In the videotapes the presence of a weapon and the robber's disguise were manipulated. At the identification phase, the presence of the robber in the lineup, the lineup instructions given the witnesses, and contextual aids to witness memory were manipulated. Age produced a main effect on identification accuracy (with performance declining with age), but did not interact with any of the other variables. The results indicate that the effects of the other independent variables generalize across age groups.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baltes, P. B. & Schaie, K. W. (1976). On the plasticity of intelligence in adulthood and old age.American Psychologist, 31, 720–725.
Berkowitz, L.,& Donnerstein, E. L. (1982). External validity is more than skin deep: Some answers to criticisms of laboratory experiments.American Psychologist, 37, 245–257.
Bothwell, R. K., Deffenbacher, K. A. & Brigham, J. C. (1987). Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revised.Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 691–695.
Chance, J. E. & Goldstein, A. G. (1984). Face-recognition memory: Implications for children's eyewitness testimony.Journal of Social Issues, 40, 69–85.
Craik, F. I. M. (1977). Age differences in human memory. In J. E. Birren and K. W. Schaie (Eds.),Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 384–420). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.
Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1988). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation.Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 281–290.
Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D.,& Martens, T. K. (1987a). The reliability of eyewitness identifications: The role of system and estimator variables.Law and Human Behavior, 11, 223–258.
Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D. & Martens, T. K. (1987b). Improving the reliability of eyewitness identifications: Putting context into context.Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 629–637.
Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., O'Rourke, T. E. & Martens, T. K. (1986). Unconfounding the effects of context cues on eyewitness identification accuracy.Social Behavior, 1, 113–134.
Deffenbacher, K. A. (1980). Eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Can we infer anything about their relationship?Law and Human Behavior, 4, 243–260.
Erber, J. T. (1974). Age differences in recognition memory.Journal of Gerontology, 29, 177–181.
Fleet, M. L., Brigham, J. C. & Bothwell, R. K. (1987). The confidence-accuracy relationship: The effects of confidence assessment and choosing.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 171–187.
Geiselman, R. E., Fisher, R. P., MacKinnon, D. P. & Holland, H. L. (1985). Eyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis.Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 401–412.
Konecni, V. J., & Ebbesen, E. B. (1979). External validity of research in legal psychology.Law and Human Behavior, 3, 39–70.
Konecni, V. J. & Ebbesen, E. B. (1986). Courtroom testimony by psychologists on eyewitness identification issues: Critical notes and reflections.Law and Human Behavior, 10, 117–126.
Krafka, C., & Penrod, S. (1985). Reinstatement of context in a field experiment on eyewitness identification.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 58–69.
Law and Human Behavior. (1986).10.
Lempert, R. O. (1986). Social sciences in court: On “eyewitness experts.”Law and Human Behavior, 10, 167–181.
Loftus, E. F., Loftus, G. R. & Messo, J. (1987). Some facts about “weapon focus.”Law and Human Behavior, 11, 55–62.
Malpass, R. S. & Devine, P. G. (1981a). Eyewitness identification: Lineup instructions and the absence of the offender.Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 482–489.
Malpass, R. S. & Devine, P. G. (1981b). Guided memory in eyewitness identification.Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 343–350.
Morris, J. H., Sherman, J. D. & Mansfield, E. R. (1986). Failures to detect moderating effects with ordinary least squares-moderated multiple regression: Some reasons and a remedy.Psychological Bulletin, 99, 282–288.
Parker, J. F., Haverfield, E. & Baker-Thomas, S. (1986). Eyewitness testimony of children.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 287–302.
Saks, M. J. (1986). The law does not live by eyewitness testimony alone.Law and Human Behavior, 10, 279–280.
Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515–530.
Serlin, R. C. (1987). Hypothesis testing, theory building,and the philosophy of science.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 365–371.
Shapiro, P. & Penrod, S. D. (1986). A meta-analysis of the facial identification literature.Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139–156.
Smith, A. D. & Winograd, E. (1978). Age differences in remembering faces.Developmental Psychology, 14, 443–444.
Yarmey, A. D., & Kent, J. (1980). Eyewitness identification by elderly and young adults. Unpublished manuscript, University of Guelph.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The quality of this manuscript has been improved considerably through the helpful comments of Ronald Fisher Michael Leippe, and an anonymous reviewer.
About this article
Cite this article
O'Rourke, T.E., Penrod, S.D., Cutler, B.L. et al. The external validity of eyewitness identification research: Generalizing across subject populations. Law Hum Behav 13, 385–395 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01056410
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01056410