Abstract
This article reports three experiments that examine how mock jurors respond to the testimony of a child witness as compared to the testimony of a young adult and elderly witness. In Experiment 1, mock jurors viewed a videotaped recreation of a court trial in which the age of the prosecution's key witness was presented as 8, 21, or 74. Contrary to prior research in this area, the testimony of the 8-year-old witness was rated as more credible than identical testimony given by the 21-year-old witness. The elderly witness was also viewed as more credible than the young adult witness, but less so than the child witness. These findings were replicated in Experiment 2, where mock jurors read a written transcript of the same trial that was presented via videotape in Experiment 1. In Experiment 3, a survey was taken of mock jurors' beliefs about age differences in eyewitness ability. In general, mock jurors were found to hold a negative stereotype of the child witness. These findings are discussed in terms of current theory and research on juror reactions to the child witness, and the more general issue of how stereotypes influence impression formation and social judgment.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Beach, B. H. (1983, January 31). Out of the mouth of babes.Time, p. 58.
Brigham, J. C., & Bothwell, R. K. (1983). The ability of prospective jurors to estimate the accuracy of eyewitness identifications.Law and Human Behavior, 7, 19–30.
Brown, M. R. (1926).Legal psychology. Indianapolis, Indiana: Bobbs-Merrill.
Ceci, S. J., & Bronfenbrenner, U. (1985). Don't forget to take the cupcakes out of the oven: Prospective memory, strategic time-monitoring, and context.Child Development, 56, 152–164.
Condry, J. C., & Ross, D. F. (1985). Sex and aggression: The influence of gender label on the perception of aggression in children.Child Development, 56, 225–233.
Deffenbacher, K., & Loftus, E. F. (1982). Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior?Law and Human Behavior, 6, 15–30.
Duggan, L. M., Aubrey, M., Doherty, E., Isquith, P., Levine, M., & Scheiner, J. (1989). The credibility of children as witnesses in a simulated child sex abuse trial. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.),Perspectives on the child witness (pp. 71–79). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Finkelhor, D. (1984).Child sexual abuse. New York: The Free Press.
Gardner, H. (1983).Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Goodman, G. S., Golding, J. M., & Haith, M. (1984). Jurors' reactions to child witnesses.Journal of Social Issues, 40, 139–156.
Goodman, G. S. (1984). Children's testimony in historical perspective.Journal of Social Issues, 40, 9–31.
Goodman, G. S., Golding, J. M., Helgeson, V., Haith, M., & Michelli, J. (1987). When a child takes the stand: Jurors' perceptions of children's eyewitness testimony.Law and Human Behavior, 11, 27–40.
Goodman, G. S., Bottoms, B. L., Hersocvici, B. B., & Shaver, P. (1989). Determinants of the child victim's perceived credibility. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.),Perspectives on the child witness (pp. 1–22). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953).Communication and persuasion. New Haven: Yale.
Jessum, L., Coleman, L., & Lerch, L. (1987). The nature of stereotypes: A comparison and integration of three theories.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 536–546.
Leippe, M. R., & Romanczyk, A. (1987). Children on the witness stand: A communication/persuasion analysis of jurors' reactions to child witnesses. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.),Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 155–177), New York: Springer-Verlag.
Leippe, M. R., & Romanczyk, A. (1989). Reactions to child (versus adult) eyewitnesses: The influence of jurors' preconceptions and witness behavior.Law and Human Behavior, 13, 103–132.
Leippe, M. R., Brigham, J. C., Cousins, C., & Romanczyk, A. (1989). The opinions and practices of criminal attorneys regarding child eyewitnesses: A survey. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.),Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 100–130). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Lindsay, R. C. L., Wells, G. L., & Rumpel, C. (1981). Can people detect eyewitness identification accuracy within and across situations?Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 79–89.
Manis, M., Paskewitz, J., Cotler, S. (1986). Stereotypes and social judgment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 461–473.
Neisser, U. (1982).Remembering in natural context. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Nigro, G. N., Buckley, M. A., Hill, D. A., & Nelson, J. (1989). When juries “hear” children testify: The effects of eyewitness age and speech style on jurors' perceptions of testimony. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.),Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 57–70). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ross, D. F., Miller, B. S., & Moran, P. (1987). The child in the eyes of the jury: Assessing mock jurors' perceptions of the child witness. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.),Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 142–154). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Ross, D. F., Dunning, D., Toglia, M. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1989). Age stereotypes, communication modality, and mock jurors' perceptions of the child witness. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.),Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 37–56). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Seth, D. (1969).Children against witches. New York: Taplinger.
Varenconck, J. (1911). Les témoignages d'enfants dans un procès retentissant.Archives de psychologie, 11, 129–171.
Wells, G. L., Turtle, J. W., & Luus, C. A. (1989). The perceived credibility of child eyewitnesses: What happens when they use their own words? In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.),Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 23–36). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Wells, G. L., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Tousignant, J. P. (1980). Effects of expert psychological advice on human performance in judging the validity of eyewitness testimony.Law and Human Behavior, 4, 275–285.
Wells, G. L., & Leippe, M. R. (1981). How do triers of fact infer the accuracy of eyewitness identification? Using memory for detail can be misleading.Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 682–687.
Whipple, G. M. (1911). The psychology of testimony.Psychological Bulletin, 8, 307–309.
Yarmey, A. D., & Jones, H. P. T. (1983). Is the psychology of eyewitness identifications a matter of common sense? In S. M. A. Lloyd-Bostock & B. R. Cliffords (Eds.),Evaluating witness evidence: Recent psychological research and new perspectives. Chichester, England: Wiley.
Yarmey, A. D., Rashid, S., & Jones, H. P. T. (1981). Attitudes of elderly and young adults toward jurors. Unpublished manuscript, University of Guelph, Ontario.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We thank the Honorable Judge Betty Friedlander and attorneys William Sullivan and Frank Smithsen for playing the role of judge, prosecution, and defense in the videotaping of the mock trial used in this study. Moreover, we thank Beth Miller and Pat Moran for helping with data collection. This research was supported by a grant from the College of Human Ecology at Cornell to the first author.
About this article
Cite this article
Ross, D.F., Dunning, D., Toglia, M.P. et al. The child in the eyes of the jury. Law Hum Behav 14, 5–23 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055786
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01055786