Abstract
The courtship behavior of 12 phycitine moths (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) was studied using frame-by-frame analysis of video recordings. Behavioral transitions during courtship were quantified for selected species and kinematic diagrams of courtship sequences were constructed. Interspecific similarities in courtship behaviors were measured by calculating Euclidean distances between species based on 12 courtship characters and by clustering species according to UPGMA (unweighted pair-group method using arithmetic averages). The resulting phenogram revealed two major behavioral patterns in courtship: (1) interactive and (2) simple. The former was characterized by a complex sequence in which, typically, a male approached a pheromoneemitting female, engaged in a head- to- head posture with the female, and then brought his abdomen over his head and struck the female on the head and thorax. This action brought male abdominal scent structures into close proximity with the female antennae. The male then attempted copulation from the head- to- head position by a dorsolateral thrust of the abdomen toward the female genitalia. Males of these species possessed scent structures located either on the eighth abdominal segment, or in a costal fold of the forewing, or both. Courtship in the second group was much more prosaic. After locating the female by response to her sex pheromone, the male simply attempted copulation by lateral abdominal thrusts under the female wing, without behavioral embellishments. Males of species exhibiting simple courtship had either no scent structures or structures that appeared vestigial. The grouping of species based on courtship characters was poorly correlated with taxonomic relationships, suggesting that the selective pressures governing the evolution and maintenance of courtship and male pheromones were distinct from those involved in the evolution of other morphological characters. While we argue that the primary force molding the evolution of courtship was an adaptive response to interspecific mating mistakes, we do not believe that isolation is brought about by the sequence of courtship behaviors themselves, due to the striking similarity in the sequence across several diverse species. Rather, these behaviors act to deliver more efficiently the male pheromonal message, which mayhave evolved for reproductive isolation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Agenjo, R. (1958). Tribus y subtribus de la subfamiliaPhycitinae Cotes, 1899.Eos Madr. 34: 205–208.
Alcock, J. (1984).Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.
Arthur, A. P. (1978). The occurrence, life history, courtship, and mating behaviour of the sunflower moth,Homeosoma electellum (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae), in the Canadian prairie provinces.Can. Entomol. 110: 913–916.
Barrer, P. M., and Hill, R. J. (1977). Some aspects of the courtship behaviour ofEphestia cautella (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae).J. Aust. Entomol. Soc. 16: 301.
Barth, R. (1937). Bau and Funktion der Flügeldrüsen einiger Mikrolepidopteren.Z. Wiss. Zool. 150: 1–37.
Birch, M. C. (1972). Male abdominal brush-organs in British noctuid moths and their value as a taxonomic character. II.Entomologist (Lond.) 105: 233–244.
Brady, U. E. (1971). Sex stimulant and attractant in the Indian meal moth and in the almond moth.Science 171: 802–804.
Brady, U. E., and Daley, R. C. (1972). Identification of a sex pheromone from the female raisin moth,Cadra figulilella. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am.65: 1356–1358.
Brady, U. E., and Nordlund, D. A. (1971).Cis-9, trans-12-tetradecadien-1-yl acetate in the female tobacco mothEphestia elutella (Hubner) and evidence for an additional component of the sex pheromone.Life Sci. 10: 797–801.
Cotter, W. B. (1967). Mating behavior and fitness as a function of single allele differences inEphestia kuhniella Z.Evolution 21: 275–284.
Ewing, A. W., and Manning, A. (1967). The evolution and genetics of insect behaviour.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 12: 471–494.
Fatzinger, C. W., and Asher, W. C. (1971). Mating behavior and evidence for a sex pheromone ofDioryctria abietella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae (Phycitinae)).Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 64: 612–620.
Ganyard, M. C., and Brady, U. E. (1972). Interspecific attraction in Lepidoptera in the field.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65: 1279–1282.
Grant, G. G. (1976). Courtship behavior of a phycitid moth,Vitula edmandsae. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am.69: 445–449.
Grant, G. G. (1978). Morphology of the presumed male pheromone glands on the forewings of tortricid and phycitid moths.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 71: 423–431.
Grant, G. G., and Brady, U. E. (1975). Courtship behavior of phycitid moths. I. Comparison ofPlodia interpunctella andCadra cautella and role of male scent glands.Can. J. Zool. 53: 813–826.
Grant, G. G., Smithwick, E. B., and Brady, U. E. (1975). Courtship behavior of phycitid moths. II. Behavioral and pheromonal isolation ofPlodia interpunctella andCadra cautella in the laboratory.Can. J. Zool. 53: 827–832.
Greenfield, M. D., and Coifelt, J. A. (1983). Reproductive behaviour of the lesser wax mothAchroia grisella F. (Pyralidae: Gallerinae): Signalling, pair formation, male interactions, and mate guarding.Behaviour 84: 287–315.
Hirai, K. (1982). Mating behavior of the limabean pod borer,Etiella zinckenella Treitschke (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).Appl. Entomol. Zool. 17: 480–485.
Heinrich, C. (1956). American Moths of the Subfamily Phycitinae. U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 207. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
Krasnoff, S. B., and Vick, K. W. (1984). Male wing-gland pheromone ofEphestia elutella. J. Chem. Ecol.10: 667–679.
Kuwahara, Y., Kitamura, C., Takahashi, S., Hara, H., Ishii, S., and Fukami, H. (1971). Sex pheromone of the almond moth and the Indian-meal moth:cis-9, trans-Vl tetradecadienyl acetate.Science 171: 801–802.
Losey, G. S. (1978). Information theory and communication. In Colgan, P. W. (ed.),Quantitative Ethology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 43–78.
McLaughlin, J. R. (1982). Behavioral effect of a sex pheromone extracted from forewings of malePlodia interpunctella.Environ. Entomol. 11: 378–380.
Oden, N. (1977). Partitioning dependence in nonstationary behavioral sequences. In Hazlett, B. (ed.),Quantitative Methods in the Study of Animal Behavior, Academic Press, New York, pp. 203–220.
Phelan, P. L., and Baker, T. C. (1986). Cross-attraction of five species of stored-product Phycitinae (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in a wind tunnel.Environ. Entomol. 15: 369–372.
Phelan, P. L., and Baker, T. C. (1987). Evolution of male courtship pheromones in moths: Reproductive isolation through sexual selection?Science 235: 205–207.
Phelan, P. L., Silk, P. J., Northcott, C. J., Tan, S. H., and Baker, T. C. (1986). Chemical identification and behavioral characterization of male wing pheromone ofEphestia elutella (Pyralidae).J. Chem. Ecol. 12: 135–146.
Phelan, P. L., and Baker, T. C. Information transmission during intra- and interspecific courtship inEphestia elutella andCadra figulilella. J. Insect Behav. (in press).
Roesler, R. V. (1973).Die trifinen Acrobasiina der Phycitinae (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae), G. Fromme, Vienna.
Shaffer, J. C. (1968). A Revision of the Peoriinae and Anerastiinae (Auctorum) of America North of Mexico (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). U.S. Natl. Mus. Bull. 280. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C.
Slater, P. J. B. (1973). Describing sequences of behavior. In Bateson, P. P. G., and Klopfer, P. H. (eds.),Perspectives in Ethology, Plenum Press, New York, Chap. 5.
Sneath, P. H. A., and Sokal, R. R. (1973).Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification, Freeman, San Francisco.
Spieth, H. T., and Ringo, J. M. (1983). Mating behavior and sexual isolation inDrosophila. In Ashburner, M., Carson, H. L., and Thompson, J. N., Jr. (eds.),The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila,Vol. 3C, Academic Press, New York.
Strong, R. G., Partida, G. J., and Warner, D. N. (1968). Rearing stored-product insects for laboratory studies: Six species of moths.J. Econ. Entomol. 61: 1237–1249.
Struble, D. L., and Richards, K. W. (1983). Identification of sex pheromone components of the female dried fruit moth,Vitula edmandsae serratilineella, and a blend for attraction of male moths.J. Chem. Ecol. 9: 785–801.
Zagatti, P. (1981). Comportement sexuel de la Pyrale de la canne à sucre:Eldana saccharina (Wlk.) lié à deux phéromones émises par le mâle.Behaviour 78: 81–98.
Zagatti, P., Kunesch, G., Ramiandrasoa, F., Malosse, C., Hall, D. R., Lester, R., and Nesbitt, B. F. (1987). Sex pheromones of rice moth,Corcyra cephalonica Stainton I. Identification of male pheromone.J. Chem. Ecol. 13: 1561–1573.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Phelan, P.L., Baker, T.C. Comparative study of courtship in twelve phycitine moths (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J Insect Behav 3, 303–326 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052112
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052112