Abstract
Incisor enamel microstructure proved to be a very effective tool for assessment of phylogenetic relationships among the Rodentia. Pauciserial and multiserial Schmelzmuster are clearly distinct by structural characters such as orientation of interprismatic matrix, presence or absence of transition zones between Hunter-Schreger bands (HSB), inclination of HSB, enamel thickness, and others. Pauciserial HSB are structurally very close to the earliest known mammalian HSB found in Paleocene arctocyonids. Biomechanical arguments and outgroup comparison with mixodontians indicate that the pauciserial Schmelzmuster is a symplesiomorphy of the Rodentia. Transitional stages from pauciserial to multiserial Schmelzmuster were observed in middle Eocene ctenodactyloids and from pauciserial to uniserial in middle to late Eocene anomalurids. The multiserial Schmelzmuster is considered a synapomorphy of the Hystricognathi, ctenodactylids, and pedetids. Schmelzmuster evolution reflects the early dichotomy of the Rodentia: In the Asian ctenodactyloid lineage a multiserial Schmelzmuster evolved once and in the North American/European ischyromyoid lineage a uniserial Schmelzmuster developed several times convergently. The pauci- to uniserial Schmelzmuster of the anomalurids excludes a close relationship to the phiomyids, because the ctenodactyloid-phiomyid lineage is characterized by the development of a multiserial Schmelzmuster.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Literature cited
Beintema, J. J., Rodewald, K., Braunitzer, G., Czelusniak, J. and Goodman, M. (1991). Studies on the phylogenetic position of the Ctenodactylidae (Rodentia).Mol. Biol. Evol. 8 151–154.
Boyde, A. (1978). Development of the structure of the enamel of the incisor teeth in the three classical subordinal groups of the Rodentia. In:Development, Function and Evolution of Teeth, P. M. Butler and K. A. Josey, eds., pp. 43–58, Academic Press, London, New York, San Francisco.
Coiffait, Ph.-E., Coiffait, B., Jaeger, J.-J., and Mahboubi, M. (1984). Un nouveau gisement à mammifères fossiles d'age Éocène supérieur sur le versant sud des Nementcha (Algérie orientale): Découverte des plus anciens rongeurs d'Afrique.C.R. Acad. Sc. Paris D 299(13): 893–898.
Dashzeveg, D. (1990a). The earliest rodents (Rodentia, Ctenodactyloidea) of Central Asia.Acta Zool. Cracov. 33(2): 11–35.
Dashzeveg, D. (1990b). New trends in adaptive radiation of early Tertiary rodents (Rodentia, Mammalia).Acta Zool. Cracov. 33(3): 37–44.
Dashzeveg, D., and McKenna, M. C. (1991).Euboromys, a new name for the Eocene rodentBoromys DASH-ZEVEG, 1990, notBoromys MILLER, 1916.J. Vert. Paleont. 11(4): 527.
Dashzeveg, D., Russell, D. E., and Flynn, L. J. (1987). New Glires (Mammalia) from the early Eocene of the People's Republic of Mongolia. Part I. Systematics and description.Proc. Konink. Akad. Wetensch. B 90 133–142.
Dauphin, Y., Denis, A., and Denys, Ch. (1988). Les différents types d'émail chez les Rongeurs (Mammalia): Conséquences d'un réexamen de leurs caractéristiques et de leurs définitions.C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris D 306 93–98.
Dawson, M. R., Li, C.-K., and Qi, T. (1984). Eocene ctenodactyloid rodents (Mammalia) of Eastern and Central Asia.Spec. Publ. Carnegie Mus. Nat. Hist. 9 138–150.
Flynn, L. J., Jacobs, L. L., and Cheema, I. U. (1986). Baluchimyinae, a new ctenodactyloid rodent subfamily from the Miocene of Baluchistan.Am. Mus. Nov. 2841 1–58.
Flynn, L. J., Russell, D. E., and Dashzeveg, D. (1987). New Glires (Mammalia) from Early Eocene of the People's Republic of Mongolia. 2. Incisor morphology and enamel microstructure.Proc. Koninkl. Akad. Wetensch. B 90 143–154.
Flynn, J. J., Norell, M. A., Swisher, C. C., and Wyss, A. R. (1991). Pre-Deseadan, post-Mustersan mammals from Central Chile: An update.J. Vert. Paleont. (Suppl.) 11(3): abstr. 66.
Fortelius, M. (1984). Vertical decussation of enamel prisms in lophodont ungulates. In:Tooth Enamel, Vol. IV, R. W. Fearhead and S. Suga, eds., pp. 427–431. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Fortelius, M. (1985). Ungulate cheek teeth: Developmental, functional, and evolutionary interrelations.Acta Zool. Fenn. 180 1–76.
George, W. (1985). Reproductive and chromosomal characters of ctenodactylids as a key to their evolutionary relationships. In:Evolutionary Relationships among Rodents, W. P. Luckett and J.-L. Hartenberger, eds., pp. 453–474, Plenum Press, New York.
Gevin, P., Lavocat, R., Mongereau, N., and Sudre, J. (1975). Découverte de mammifères dans la moitié inférieure de l'Eocène continental du Nord-Ouest du Sahara.C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris D 280 967–968.
Hartenberger, J.-L. (1977). A propos de l'origine des rongeurs.Geobios Mém. spéc. 1 183–193.
Hartenberger, J.-L. (1980). Données et hypothèses sur la radiation initiale des rongeurs.Palaeovert. Mém. Jubil. R. Lavocat 285–301.
Hartenberger, J.-L. (1982). A review of the Eocene rodents of Pakistan.Contrib. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Mich. 26(2): 19–35.
Hartenberger, J.-L. (1986). Hypothèse paléontologique sur l'origine des Macroscelidea (Mammalia).C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris D 302 247–249.
Hartenberger, J.-L. (1990). L'origine des Theridomyoidea (Mammalia, Rodentia): Données nouvelles et hypothèses.C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris D 311 1017–1022.
Hartenberger, J.-L., Martinez, C., and Ben Said, A. (1985). Découverte de mammifères d'âge Eocène inférieur en Tunisie centrale.C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris D 301 649–652.
Hoffstetter, R. (1971). Le peuplement mammalien de l'Amérique du Sud. Rôle des continents austraux comme centres d'origine, de diversification et de dispersion pour certains groupes mammaliens.An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. (Suppl. 43 125–144.
Hoffstetter, R. (1972). Origine et dispersion des rongeurs hystricognathes.C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris D 274 2867–2870.
Hoffstetter, R., and Lavocat, R. (1970). Découverte dans le Déséadien de Bolivie de genres pentalophodontes appuyant les affinités africaines des rongeurs caviomorphes.C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris D 271 172–175.
Hussain, S. T., de Bruijn, H., and Leinders, J. M. (1978). Middle Eocene rodents from the Kala Chitta Range (Punjab, Pakistan).Proc. Konink. Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. B 81(1): 74–112.
Jaeger, J.-J., Denys, Ch., and Coiffait, B. (1985). New Phiomorpha and Anomaluridae from the late Eocene of North-West Africa: Phylogenetic implications. In:Evolutionary Relationships among Rodents, W. P. Luckett and J.-L. Hartenberger, eds., pp. 567–588, Plenum Press, New York.
Koenigswald, W. v. (1985). Evolutionary trends in the enamel Molaren der Arvicolidae (Rodentia).Abh. Senckenb. naturf. Ges. 539 1–129.
Koenigswald, W. v. (1985). Evolutionary trends in the enamel of rodent incisors. InEvolutionary Relationships Among Rodents, W. P. Luckett and J.-L. Hartenberger, eds., pp. 403–422, Plenum Press, New York.
Koenigswald, W. v. (1988). Enamel modification in enlarged front teeth among mammals and the various possible reinforcements of the enamel.Mém. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. C 53 148–165.
Koenigswald, W. v. (1993). Die Schmelzmuster in den Schneidezähnen der Gliroidea (Gliridae und Seleviniidae, Rodentia, Mammalia) und ihre systematische Bedeutung.Z. Säugetierkunde 58 92–115.
Koenigswald, W. v., and Clemens, W. A. (1992). Levels of complexity in the microstructure of mammalian enamel and their application in studies of systematics.Scan. Microsc. 6(1): 195–218.
Koenigwswald, W. v., and Pascual, R. (1990). The Schmelzmuster of the Paleogene South American rodent-like marsupialsGroebria andPatagonia compared to rodents and other Marsupialia.Paläont. Z. 64(3/4): 345–358.
Koenigswald, W. v., Rensberger, J. M., and Pfretzschner, H. U. (1987). Changes in the tooth enamel of early Paleocene mammals allowing increased diet diversity.Nature 328 150–152.
Koenigswald, W. v., and Pfretzschner, H. U. (1991). Biomechanics in the enamel of mammalian teeth. In:Constructional Morphology and Biomechanics, N. Schmidt-Kittler and K. Vogel, eds., pp. 113–125, Springer Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg.
Korvenkontio, V. A. (1934). Mikroskopische Untersuchungen an Nagerincisiven unter Hinweis auf die Schmelzstruktur der Backenzähne.Ann. Zool. Soc. Zool.-Bot. Fenn. Vanamo 2 1–274.
Lavocat, R. (1969). La systématique des rongeurs hystricomorphes et la dérive des continents.C.R. Acad. Sc. Paris D 269 1496–1497.
Lavocat, R. (1971). Affinités systématiques des caviomorphes et des phiomorphes et origine africaine des caviomorphes.An. Acad. Brasil. Cienc. (Suppl. 43 515–522.
Lavocat, R. (1976). Rongeurs caviomorphes de l'Oligocène de Bolivie. II. Rongeurs du bassin déséadien de Salla-Luribay.Palaeovertebrata 7 15–90.
Lavocat, R. (1981). The implications of rodent paleontology and biogeography to the geographical sources and origin of platyrrhine primates. In:Evolutionary Biology of the New World Monkeys and Continental Drift, R. L. Ciochon, and A. B. Chiarelli, eds., pp. 93–102, Plenum Press, New York.
Lehner, J., and Plenk, H. (1936). Die Zähne. In:Handbuch der mikroskopischen Anatomie des Menschen 5/3, W. v. Möllendorff, ed., pp. 447–708, Berlin.
Li, C.-K. (1977). Paleocene eurymyloids (Anagalida, Mammalia) of Quianshan, Anhui.Vert. Palasiat. 15 103–118.
Li, C.-K., and Ting, S.-Y. (1985). Possible phylogenetic relationships of Asiatic eurymylids and rodents, with comments on mimotonids. In:Evolutionary Relationships among Rodents, W. P. Luckett and J.-L. Hartenberger, eds., pp. 35–58, Plenum Press, New York.
Li, C.-K., Zeng, J. J., and Ting, S.-Y. (1989). The skull ofCocomys lingchaensis, an early Eocene ctenodactyloid rodent of Asia. In:Papers on Fossil Rodents in Honour of Albert Elmer Wood, C. C. Black and M. Dawson, eds., pp. 179–192, Los Angeles County Museum, Los Angeles.
Luckett, W. P., and Hartenberger, J.-L. (1985). Evolutionary relationships among rodents: Comments and conclusions. In:Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents, W. P. Luckett and J.-L. Hartenberger, eds., pp. 685–712, Plenum Press, New York.
Martin, T. (1990a). Herkunft der caviomorphen Nagetiere Südamerikas: Hinweise aus dem Inzisiven-Schmelz.Nachr. Dt. Geol. Ges. 43 61–62.
Martin, T. (1990b). Origin of the caviomorphs: Evidence from incisor enamel.J. Vert. Paleont. (Suppl.) 10(3): abstr. 126.
Martin, T. (1992a). Early rodent incisor enamel microstructure evolution and its relevance for phylogenetic studies.J. Vert. Paleont. (Suppl.) 12(3): abstr. 111.
Martin, T. (1992b). Schmelzstruktur in den Inzisiven alt- und neuweltlicher hystricognather Nagetiere.Palaeovertebrata Mèm. extra.: 1–168.
Martin, T. (in press). African origin of caviomorph rodents indicated by incisor enamel microstructure.Paleobiology (in press).
Patterson, B., and Wood, A. (1982). Rodents from the Deseadan Oligocene of Bolivia and the relationships of the Caviomorpha.Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 149(7): 371–543.
Pfretzschner, H. U. (1988). Structural reinforcement and crack propagation in enamel.Mém. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Paris C 53 133–143.
Pfretzschner, H. U. (in press). Biomechanik der Schmelzmikrostruktur in den Backenzähnen von Großsäugern.Palaeontographica A (in press).
Reig, O. A. (1978). Roedores cricetidos del Plioceno superior de la Provincia Buenos Aires (Argentina).Publ. Mus. Munic. Cienc. Nat. “Lorenzo Scaglia” Mar del Plata 2 164–190.
Rensberger, J. M., and Koenigswald, W. v. (1980). Functional and phylogenetic interpretation of enamel microstructure in rhinoceroses.Paleobiology 6(4): 477–495.
Sahni, A. (1980). SEM studies of Eocene and Siwalik rodent enamels.Geosci. J. 1/2 21–30.
Sahni, A. (1985). Enamel structure of early mammals and its role in evaluating relationships among rodents. In:Evolutionary Relationships among Rodents, W. P. Luckett and J.-L. Hartenberger, eds., pp. 133–150, Plenum Press, New York.
Sahni, A. (1989). Eocene rodents of South Asia: Origins, dispersals, and paleoecology. In:Papers on Fossil Rodents in Honour of Albert Elmer Wood, C. C. Black and M. Dawson, eds., pp. 147–156, Los Angeles County Museum, Los Angeles.
Sudre, J. (1979). Nouveaux mammifères du Sahara Occidental.Palaeovertebrata 9(3): 83–115.
Tomes, J. (1850). On the structure of the dental tissues of the order Rodentia.Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London 1850 529–567.
Vianey-Liaud, M., Jaeger, J.-J., Hartenberger, J.-L., and Mahboubi, M. (in press). Les rongeurs de l'Eocene d'Afrique nord-occidentale [Glib Zegdou (Algerie) et Chambi (Tunisie)] et l'origine des Anomaluridae.Palaeovertebrata (in press).
Wahlert, J. H. (1968). Variability of rodent incisor enamel as viewed in thin section, and the microstructure of the enamel in fossil and Recent rodent groups.Brev. Mus. Comp. Zool. 309 1–18.
Wahlert, J. H. (1984). Hystricomorphs, the oldest branch of the Rodentia.Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 435 356–357.
Wahlert, J. H., and Koenigswald, W. v. (1985). Specialized enamel in incisors of eomyid rodents.Am. Mus. Novitates 2832 1–12.
Wood, A. E. (1949). A new Oligocene rodent genus from Patagonia.Am. Mus. Nov. 1435 1–54.
Wood, A. E. (1981). The origin of the caviomorph rodents from a source in middle America: A clue to the area of origin of the platyrrhine primates. In:Evolutionary Biology of the New World Monkeys and Continental Drift, R. L. Ciochon and A. B. Chiarelli, eds., pp. 79–91, Plenum Press, New York.
Wood, A. E. (1985). The relationships, origin and dispersal of the hystricognathous rodents. In:Evolutionary Relationships Among Rodents, W. P. Luckett and J.-L. Hartenberger, eds., pp. 475–513, Plenum Press, New York.
Wyss, A. R., Norell, M. A., Flynn, J. J., Novacek, M. J., Charrier, R., McKenna, M. C., Swisher, C. C., III, Frassinetti, D., Salinas, P., and Jin, M. (1990). A new early Tertiary mammal fauna from Central Chile: Implications for Andean stratigraphy and tectonics.J. Vert. Paleont. 10 518–522.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martin, T. Early rodent incisor enamel evolution: Phylogenetic implications. J Mammal Evol 1, 227–254 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01041665
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01041665