Abstract
Humans tend to exhibit rather consistent biases when cognitively processing information. In a gaming environment, these biases can affect participation in games of chance. The availability bias reduces complex probalistic judgments to simpler ones through the ease to which relevant instances can be brought to mind. The representativeness bias improperly attributes characteristics to an entity or process based on evidence received in a limited setting. Biasing factors appear to be affected by individual differences and situational factors. The effect on gambling may manifest itself in terms of duration of play, money played, and satisfaction or dissatisfaction with play. Implications for treatment of pathological gamblers are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Assumus, G. (1973). Bayesian analysis of the evaluation of marketing research expenditures: A reassessment.Journal of Marketing Research, 14 562–567.
Borgida, E. & Nisbett, R. E. (1977). The differential impact of abstract vs. concrete information on decisions.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 7 258–291.
Carroll, J. S. (1978). The effect of imagining an event on expectations for the event: An interpretation in terms of the availability hueristic.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14 88–96.
Estes, W. (1964). Probability learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.)Categories of human learning. New York: Academic Press.
Ferriolo, M. & Ciminero, A. (1981).The treatment of pathological gambling as an addictive behavior. Paper Presented to the Fifth National Conference on Gambling and Risk Taking. Lake Tahoe, Nevada.
Jones, E. E. & Nisbett, R. E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior.General Learning Press.
Higbee, K. (1969, December). Fifteen years of fear arousal: Research on threat appeals 1953–1969.Psychological Bulletin, 72 426–44.
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction.Psychological Review, 80 237–251.
Lathrop, R. G. (1967). Perceived variability.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73 498–502.
Nisbett, R. E. & Borgina, E. (1975). Attribution and the psychology of prediction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32 932–943.
Peterson, C. R. & Beach, L. E. (1967). Man as an intuitive statistician.Psychological Bulletin, 68 29–46.
Schroder, H. M., Driver, M. J., & Streufert, S. (1969).Human information processing. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Tune, G. (1967). Response preferences: A review of some relevant literature.Psychological Bulletin, 61 286–302.
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers.Psychological Bulletin, 76 105–110.
Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A hueristic for judging frequency and probability.Cognitive Psychology, 5 207–233.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Corney, W.J., Cummings, W.T. Gambling behavior and information processing biases. J Gambling Stud 1, 111–118 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01019864
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01019864