Synopsis
Rat brains were fixed either with glutaraldehyde (GA) or formaldehyde (FA). After 20 min or 24 h fixation the osmotic sensitivity of the tissue was tested by immersion in (a) distilled water (b) 0.15m or (c) 0.3m cacodylate buffer. GA-fixed material retained some sensitivity to osmotic stress after 20 min fixation but was entirely resistant after 24 h fixation. Ultrastructural preservation was good after only 20 min GA-fixation, provided that the subsequent treatment was with isotonic solutions. The fixation with FA was less efficient and slower. Dark neurons and other artifacts were commonly seen after the 20 min fixation with FA. Prolongation of the FA-fixation overnight gave markedly better preservation, but however, never equivalent to that with GA.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, P. J. (1967). Purification and quantitation of glutaraldehyde and its effect on several enzyme activities in skeletal muscle.J. Histochem. Cytochem. 15, 652–61.
Bohman, S. O. &Maunsbach, A. B. (1970). Effects on tissue fine structure of variations in colloid osmotic pressure of glutaraldehyde fixatives.J. Ultrastruct. Res. 30, 195–208.
Bone, Q. &Denton, E. J. (1971). The osmotic effects of electron microscope fixatives.J. Cell Biol. 49, 571–81.
Bone, Q. &Ryan, K. P. (1972). Osmolarity of osmium tetroxide and glutaraldehyde fixatives.Histochem. J. 4, 331–47.
Cammermayer, J. (1972). Nonspecific changes of the central nervous system in normal and experimental material. In:The Structure and Function of the Nervous Tissue (ed. G. H. Bourne) pp. 131–151. New York: Academic Press.
Carstensen, E. L., Aldridge, W. G., Child, S. Z., Sullivan, P. &Brown, H. H. (1971). Stability of cells fixed with glutaraldehyde and acrolein.J. Cell Biol. 50, 529–32.
Collins, V. P., Arborgh, B. &Brunk, U. (1977). A comparison of the effects of three widely used glutaraldehyde fixatives on cellular volume and structure.Acta path. microbiol. scand. A85, 157–68.
Elbers, P. F. (1966). Ion permeability of the eggs ofLimnaea stagnalis L. on fixation for electron microscopy.Biochim. Biophys. Acta 122, 318–9.
Friend, D. S., Murray, M. J. (1965). Osmium impregnation of the golgi apparatus.Am. J. Anat. 117, 135–50.
Hopwood, D. (1972). Theoretical and practical aspects of glutaraldehyde fixation.Histochem. J. 4, 267–303.
Kalimo, H. (1976). The role of the blood-brain barrier in perfusion fixation of the brain for electron microscopy.Histochem. J. 8, 1–12.
Kalimo, H., Garcia, J. H., Kamijyo, Y., Tanaka, J. &Trump, B. F. (1977). The ultrastructure of ‘brain death’: Electron microscopy of feline cortex after completed irreversible ischemia.Virchows Arch. B. Cell Path. 25, 207–20.
Karnovsky, M. J. (1967). The ultrastructural basis of capillary permeability studied with peroxidase as a tracer.J. Cell Biol. 36, 213–36.
Malmgren, L. &Olsson, Y. (1978). A sensitive method for histochemical demonstration of horseradish peroxidase in neurons following retrograde axonal transport.Brain Res. 148, 279–94.
Maunsbach, A. B. (1966). The influence of different fixatives and fixation methods on the ultrastructure of rat kidney proximal tubule cells. II. Effects of varying osmolarity, ionic strength, buffer system and fixative concentration of glutaraldehyde solutions.J. Ultrastruct. Res. 15, 283–309.
Penttilä, A., Kalimo, H. &Trump, B. F. (1974). Influence of glutaraldehyde and/or osmium tetroxide on cell volume, ion content, mechanical stability, and membrane permeability of Ehrlich ascites tumour cells.J. Cell Biol. 63, 197–214.
Schultz, R. L. &Karlsson, U. (1965). Fixation of the central nervous system for electron microscopy by aldehyde perfusion. II. Effect of osmolarity, pH of perfusate, and fixative concentration.J. Ultrastruct. Res. 12, 187–206.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paljärvi, L., Garcia, J.H. & Kalimo, H. The efficiency of aldehyde fixation for electron microscopy: Stabilization of rat brain tissue to withstand osmotic stress. Histochem J 11, 267–276 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01005026
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01005026