Abstract
Since the microbiological revolution, most infectious diseases have been defined and classified according to an etiologic criterion, i.e. the identification of single, external “necessary” causes (for example, Mycobacterium for tuberculosis). This is not the case with cancer. Not only external “necessary” causes of cancer have not been identified, but also the morphological classification cannot be based on univocal criteria. Although “neoplasia” and “anaplasia” appear to be universal attributes of cancer, these events are only quantitative. Neoplastic growth can be fast or slow (development may take weeks or years), and tissue pathologies are difficult to detect from normal tissue in some cancers but are obvious in others. Common special properties of anaplasia appear to be concealed in the wide range of morphologies. In the absence of a coherent morphological definition, and of external necessary causes (such as bacteria for infectious diseases), a mechanistic definition could be adopted. However, unless molecular biology discovers specific mechanistic steps in carcinogenesis, which indicate the existence of “necessary” events in carcinogenesis, we cannot adopt a univocal (monothetic) definition of cancer. The alternative is to use a polythetic definition, according to Wittgenstein's model of a “long rope twisted together out of many shorter fibres.”
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
MacMahon B, Pugh TF,Epidemiology — Principles and Methods. Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1970.
Kuhn TS.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd Ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
Baker GP, and Hacker PMS.Wittgenstein — Meaning and Understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980:185–208.
World Health Organization.International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. Geneva: WHO, 1976.
Berg JW. Morphologic classification of human cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF Jr, eds.Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co., 1982:74–89.
Pardee AB. Principles of cancer biology: biochemistry and cell biology. In: De Vita VT Jr, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA, eds.Cancer Principles and Practice of Oncology, 2nd Edition. New York: Lippincott, 1985:3–17.
Muller J.On the Nature and Structural Characteristics of Cancer. London: Sherwood, Gilbert and Piper, 1840.
Anderson MW, Maronpot RR, Reynolds SH. Role of oncogenes in chemical carcinogenesis: extrapolation from rodents to humans. In: Bartsch H, Hemminki K, O'Neill IK, eds.Methods for Detecting DNA Damaging Agents in Humans. IARC Scie. Publ. No. 89, Lyon: IARC, 1989.
Vahakangas KH, Samet JM, Metcalf RA, Welsh JA, Bennett JP, Lane DP, Harris CC. Mutations of p53 and ras genes in radon-associated lung cancer from uranium miners.Lancet 1992;339:576–580.
Sporn MB. Carcinogenesis and cancer: different perspectives on the same disease.Cancer Res. 1991;51:6215–6218.
Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SH, et al. Genetic alterations during colorectaltumor development.N. Engl. J. Med. 1988;319:525–532.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vineis, P. Definition and classification of cancer: Monothetic or polythetic?. Theor Med Bioeth 14, 249–256 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995166
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00995166