Abstract
The cognitive elaboration of achievement motivation theory by Raynor is reviewed, and the implications of future orientation and psychological distance are examined. It is suggested that psychological distance is determined by at least the following factors: (a) the expectancy of reaching the goal (attainability of the goal), (b) the distance in time between the present state and the future goal, and (c) the individual's future time orientation considered as a personality trait. It is argued that only the first of these factors is included in Raynor's elaboration. The latter two are assumed to determine the Perceived Goal Distance in Time (PgD), and it is postulated that the arousal of motives increases as PgD decreases. It is concluded that each future goal must be weighted by the corresponding perceived goal distance coefficient.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Atkinson, J. W. Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior.Psychological Review 1967,64 359–372.
Atkinson, J. W. (Ed.).Motives in fantasy, action, and society. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1958.
Atkinson, J. W., & Raynor, J. O. (Eds.).Motivation and achievement. Washington, D.C.: Winston, 1974.
Braley, L. S., & Freed, N. Modes of temporal orientation and psychopathology.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1971,36 33–39.
Brown, J. S. Gradients of approach and avoidance responses and their relation to level of motivation.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 1948,41 450–465.
Bugelski, R., & Miller, N. E. A spatial gradient in the strength of avoidance responses.Journal of Experimental Psychology 1938,23 494–505.
Cottle, T. J. The circles test: An investigation of perception of temporal relatedness and dominance.Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment 1967,31 58–71.
Cottle, T. J. The location of experience: A manifest time orientation.Acta Psychologica 1968,28 129–149.
Devolder, M.Time orientation: A review. Unpublished report, University of Louvain, 1978.
Dollard, J., & Miller, N. E.Personality and psychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950.
Edwards, W. The theory of decision making.Psychological Bulletin 1954,51 380–417.
Entin, E. E., & Raynor, J. O. Effects of contingent future orientation and achievement motivation on performance in two kinds of tasks.Journal of Experimental Research in Personality 1973,6 314–320.
Eson, M. E.An analysis of time perspective at five age levels. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 1951.
Fraisse, P.The psychology of time. New York: Harper & Row, 1963.
Gjesme, T.Achievement motives, perceived importance, and school performance. Unpublished report, University of Oslo, 1972.
Gjesme, T. Goal distance in time and its effects on the relations between achievement motives and performance.Journal of Research in Personality 1974,8 161–171.
Gjesme, T. Slope of gradients for performance as a function of achievement motive, goal distance in time and future time orientation.Journal of Psychology 1975,91 143–160.
Gjesme, T. Future-time gradients for performance in test anxious individuals.Perceptual and Motor Skills 1976,42 235–242.
Gjesme, T. Future time orientation as a function of achievement motives, ability, delay of gratification, and sex.Journal of Psychology 1979,101 173–188. (a)
Gjesme, T.Relationships between perceived instrumentality of school performance and future time orientation. Unpublished paper, Ruhr University, 1979. (b)
Gjesme, T.On the concept of future time orientation. Considerations of some influencing factors and measurement's implications. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1979. (c)
Gjesme, T., & Nygård, R.Achievement-related motives: Theoretical considerations and construction of a measuring instrument. Unpublished report, University of Oslo, 1970.
Goldrich, J. M. A study in time orientation: The relation between memory for past experience and orientation to the future.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1967,6 216–221.
Heckhausen, H.The anatomy of achievement motivation. New York: Academic Press, 1967.
Heckhausen, H. Intervening cognitions in motivation. In D. E. Berlyne & K. B. Madsen (Eds.),Pleasure, reward, preference. New York: Academic Press, 1973. Pp. 217–240.
Heckhausen, H. Achievement motivation and its constructs: A cognitive model.Motivation and Emotion 1977,1 283–329.
Heckhausen, H.Motivation und Handeln. Heidelberg: Springer, 1980.
House, W. C. Performance expectancies and affect associated with outcomes as a function of time perspective.Journal of Research in Personality 1973,7 277–288.
Isaacson, R. L., & Raynor, J. O.Achievement-related motivation and perceived instrumentality of grades to future career success. Unpublished paper, University of Michigan, 1966.
Kuhl, J. Standard setting and risk preference: An elaboration of the theory of achievement motivation and an empirical test.Psychological Review 1978,85 239–248.
Lewin, K.The conceptual representation and the measurement of psychological forces. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press, 1938.
McClelland, D.C. Notes for a revised theory of motivation. In D. C. McClelland (Ed.),Studies in motivation. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1955.
McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L.The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953.
Miller, N. E. Experimental studies of conflict. In J. McV. Hunt (Ed.),Personality and the behavior disorders. New York: Ronald, 1944, Pp. 431–465.
Miller, N. E. Comments on theoretical models illustrated by the development of theory of conflict behavior.Journal of Personality 1951,20 82–100.
Miller, N. E. Liberalization of basic s-r concepts: Extensions to conflict behavior, motivation, and social learning. In S. Koch (Ed.),Psychology: A study of science. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959. Pp. 196–292.
Miller, N. E., & Murray, E. J. Displacement and conflict: Learnable drive as a basis for a steeper gradient of avoidance than of approach.Journal of Experimental Psychology 1952,43 227–231.
Mischel, W., Grusec, J., & Masters, J. C. Effects of expected delay time on the subjective value of rewards and punishments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1969,11 363–373.
Nuttin, J.Tache, reusite et echec. Theorie de la conduite humaine. Louvain: Publications Universitaires de Louvain, 1953.
Nuttin, J. The future time perspective in human motivation and learning. InProceedings of the 17th International Congress of Psychology. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1964.
Nuttin, J.Human motivation and time perspective. Part II. The motivational introduction method (M.I.M) and the motivational inventory. Unpublished manuscript, University of Leuven, 1976.
Nygård, R. A reconsideration of the achievement-motivation theory.European Journal of Social Psychology 1975,5 61–92.
Nygård, R., & Gjesme, T. Assessment of achievement motives: Comments and suggestions.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 1973,17 39–46.
Piaget, J. Time perception in children. In J. T. Fraser (Ed.),The voices of time. New York: Braziller, 1966. Pp. 202–216.
Raynor, J. O.The functional significance of future goals. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association as part of a symposium entitled: A Theory of Achievement Motivation: Problems and New Developments, Washington D.C., September 1967.
Raynor, J. O. Future orientation and motivation of immediate activity: An elaboration of the theory of achievement motivation.Psychological Review 1969,76 606–610.
Raynor, J. C. Relationships between achievement-related motives, future orientation, and academic performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1970,15 28–33.
Raynor, J. O. Future orientation in the study of achievement motivation. In J. W. Atkinson & J. O. Raynor (Eds.),Motivation and achievement. Washington, D.C.: Winston, 1974. Pp. 121–154.
Raynor, J. O., Atkinson, J. W., & Brown, M. Subjective aspects of achievement motivation immediately before an examination. In J. O. Raynor & J. W. Atkinson (Eds.),Motivation and achievement. Washington, D.C.: Winston, 1974, Pp. 155–171.
Raynor, J. O., & Rubin, I. S. Effects of achievement motivation and future orientation on level of performance.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1971,17 36–41.
Raynor, J. O., & Sorrentino, R. M.Effects of achievement motivation and task difficulty on immediate performance in contingent paths. Unpublished paper, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1972.
Revelle, W., & Michaels, E. J. The theory of achievement motivation revisited: The implications of inertial tendencies.Psychological Review 1976,83 394–404.
Ruiz, R. A., Reivich, R. S., & Krauss, H. H. Tests of temporal perspective: Do they measure the same construct?Psychological Reports 1967,21 849–852.
Zurcher, L. A., Jr., Willis, J. E., Ikard, F. F., & Dohme, J. A. Dogmatism, future orientation, and perception of time.Journal of Social Psychology 1967,73 205–209.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was carried out while the author was a visiting professor at Ruhr University, Bochum, under the support of an Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung grant.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gjesme, T. Is there any future in achievement motivation?. Motivation and Emotion 5, 115–138 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993892
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993892