Abstract
This paper reports two studies on the interrelations involving social transgressions, the perspectives from which the actor who commits such a transgression is evaluated, and the extent and quality of the emotionality experienced by the actor. The first experiment examined subjects' perceptions of vignettes depicting transgressions that were either low or relatively high in apparent intent. The phrasing of the situation descriptions and ensuing questions led subjects to rate the actor in each vignette from one of four social perspectives, corresponding to self-image, public image, subjective public image, and inferred subjective public image. As predicted, dispositional ratings made from the two latter perspectives were more evaluatively negative than were ratings made from the two former perspectives, and ratings were more negative where the transgressions were relatively high in apparent intent. In the second experiment, the quality of the actor's posttransgression subjective public image was varied (positive, neutral, or negative), and subjects were asked to rate how the actor felt. As predicted, ratings of negative emotionality were higher and ratings of positive emotionality were lower when subjective public image was negative. The results of the two studies are interpreted as supporting an impression management theory of social emotionality.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Buss, A. H.Self-consciousness and social anxiety. San Francisco: Freeman, 1980.
Cialdini, R. B., Darby, B. L., & Vincent, J. E. Transgression and altruism: A case for hedonism.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1973,9 502–516.
Edelmann, R. J., & Hampson, S. E. Changes in non-verbal behavior during embarrassment.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 1979,18 385–390.
Edelmann, R. J., & Hampson, S. E. The recognition of embarrassment.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1981,7 109–116.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. Verbal reports as data.Psychological Review 1980,87 215–251.
Freedman, J. L., Wallington, S. A., & Bless, E. Compliance without pressure: The effects of guilt.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1967,7 117–124.
Goffman, E. Embarrassment and social organization.American Journal of Sociology 1956,62 264–274.
Gould, R., & Sigall, H. The effects of empathy and outcome on attribution: An examination of the divergent-perspectives hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1977,13 480–491.
Jones, E. E. & Davis, K. E. From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1965.
Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R.E. The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nisbett, S. Valins, & & B. Weiner (Eds.),Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior. Morriston, New Jersey: General Learning Press, 1972.
Katzev, R., Edelsack, L., Steinmetz, G., Walker, T., & Wright, R. The effect of reprimanding transgressions on subsequent helping behavior: Two field experiments.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1978,4 326–329.
Modigliani, A. Embarrassment and embarrassability.Sociometry 1968,31 313–326.
Modigliani, A. Embarrassment, facework, and eye contact: Testing a theory of embarrassment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1971,17 15–24.
Nisbett, R. E. & Bellows, N. Verbal reports about causal influences on social judgments: Private access versus public theories.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1977,35 613–624.
Nisbett, R. E. & Wilson, T. D. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.Psychological Review 1977,84 231–259.
Regan, D. T., & Totten, J. Empathy and attribution: Turning observers into actors.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1975,32 850–856.
Regan, D. T., Williams, M., & Sparling, S. Voluntary expiation of guilt: A field experiment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1972,24 42–45.
Regan, J. W. Guilt, perceived injustice, and altruistic behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1971,18 124–132.
Rich, M. V. Verbal reports on mental processes: Issues of accuracy and awareness.Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 1979,9 29–37.
Semin, G. R., & Manstead, A. S. R. The beholder beheld: A study of social emotionality.European Journal of Social Psychology, in press.
Semin, G. R., & Manstead, A. S. R.The social consequences of embarrassment displays and restitution behavior. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Smith, E. R., & Miller, F. D. Limits on the perception of cognitive processes: A reply to Nisbett and Wilson.Psychological Review 1978,85 355–362.
Wallace, J., & Sadalla, E. Behavioral consequences of transgression: 1. The effects of social recognition.Journal of Experimental Research in Personality 1966,1 187–194.
White, P. Limitations on verbal reports of internal events: A refutation of Nisbett and Wilson and of Bem.Psychological Review 1980,87 105–112.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported by Social Science Research Council (U.K.) grant No. HR 7122/1. The authors would like to thank J. Fordham for his help in conducting Experiment 2.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Manstead, A.S.R., Semin, G.R. Social transgressions, social perspectives, and social emotionality. Motivation and Emotion 5, 249–261 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993888
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993888