Abstract
This study examines changes in institutional research performance over time by analyzing data from four national surveys of the American professoriate conducted between 1969 and 1988. To assess whether groups of institutions may be accumulating advantage relative to others, research activities are compared across five Carnegie institution types. Weights are created to adjust for sampling differences and research output measures are standardized to adjust for variation by discipline. Findings show an overall strengthening of research emphasis reflected by a stronger orientation toward research (more faculty holding Ph.D.'s and having a primary interest in research) and higher research output (grant and publication performance). While Research-I universities have retained their initial (1969) advantage, they have not accumulated more. Meanwhile, Doctoral-Granting-I universities have gained strength relative to Research-II institutions. Research at Comprehensive-I was also up, but at a slower rate than the other Carnegie groups.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allison, P. D., and Stewart, J. A. (1974). Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage.American Sociological Review 39: 596–606.
American Universities and Colleges (1968). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
American Universities and Colleges (1983). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
American Universities and Colleges (1987). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Bayer A. E. (1970).College and University Faculty: A Statistical Description (Vol. 5, No. 5). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Bayer, A. E., and Dutton, J. E. (1977, May–June). Career age and research-professional activities of academic scientists.Journal of Higher Education 48: 259–282.
Bieber, J., and Blackburn, R. T. (1989). Faculty research productivity 1972–1988: Development and application of constant units of measurement. Paper presented at the annual Association for the Study of Higher Education meeting. Atlanta, GA.
Biglan, A. (1973, June). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas.Journal of Applied Psychology 57(3): 195–203.
Blackburn, R. T., Behymer, C. E., and Hall, D. E. (1978). Correlates of faculty publications.Sociology Education 51: 132–141.
Blackburn, R. T., Bobert, A., O'Connell, C., and Pellino, G. R. (1980).Project for Faculty Development Program Evaluation. Ann Arbor: Center for the Study of Higher Education, University of Michigan.
Blackburn, R. T., and Lawrence, J. H. (1989).Faculty at Work: Final Report of the National Survey. Ann Arbor: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Blackburn, R. T., Lawrence, J. H., Ross, S., Okoloko, V. P., Bieber, J., Meiland, R., and Street, Terry (1986).Faculty as a Key Resource. Ann Arbor: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
Bowen, H. R., and Schuster, J. H. (1986).American Professors: A National Resource Imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.
Carnegie Commission on Higher Education (1973).A Classification of Institutions of Higher Education.
Carnegie Council on Policy Studies in Higher Education (1976).A Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, revised edition.
Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1987). Carnegie foundation's classifications of more than 3,300 institutions of higher education.The Chronicle of Higher Education. 22–26, 28–30.
Clark, M. J., and Centra, J. A. (1982).Conditions Influencing the Career Accomplishments of Ph.D.s (ETS Research Report 82-18). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
Cole, J. R., and Cole S. (1973).Social Stratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cole, S. S., Rubin, L., and Cole, J. R. (1978).Peer Review in the NSF: Phase I of a Study. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
Creswell, J. W. (1985).Faculty Research Performance (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4). Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education.
Drew, E. D., and Tronvig, J. A. (1988).Assessing the Quality of National Data About Academic Scientists. Claremont: The Claremont Graduate School, Claremont, CA.
Finkelstein, M. J. (1984).The American Academic Profession. Ohio: Ohio State University Press.
Graves, F. (1986, July/August). Hog heaven.Common Cause Magazine, pp. 17–23.
Higher Education Research Institute (1983). Technical Report to 1980 National Survey (exact title unknown). Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
Lazarsfeld, P. F., and Thielens, W., Jr. (1958).The Academic Mind: Social Scientists in a Time of Crisis. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Long, J. S. (December 1978). Productivity and academic position in the scientific career.American Sociological Review 43: 889–908.
Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity.Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences 16(12): 317–323.
McCarthy, C. (1986, July 19). Pork with a Ph.D.The Washington Post.
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science.Science 159: 56–63.
National Research Council (1987).Summary Report 1986: Doctorate Recipients from United States Universities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Science Foundation (1981).Science Indicators—1981. Washington, DC: National Science Board, National Science Foundation.
National Science Foundation (1987).Science and Engineering Indicators—1987. Washington, DC: National Science Board, National Science Foundation.
Price, D. (1963).Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.
Roizen, J., Fulton, O. and Trow, M. (1978).Technical Report: 1975 Carnegie Council National Surveys of Higher Education. Berkeley: Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of California.
Rose, R. M. (1986, October 8). Pork-barrel science vs. peer review.The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. 96.
Smith, B. L., and Karlesky, J. J. (1977).The State of Academic Science: Universities in the Nation's Research Effort. New York: Change Magazine Press.
Trow, M. A. (1975). Technical report on the 1969 Carnegie Commission survey of faculty and student opinion.Teachers and Students. Berkeley: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Wanner, R. A., Lewis, L. S., and Gregorio, D. I. (1981). Research productivity in academia: A comparative study of the sciences, social sciences, and humanities.Sociology of Science 54: 238–253.
Young, D. L., Blackburn, R. T., Conrad, C. F., and Cameron, K. S. (1989). Leadership, student effort, and department program quality: An exploration of quality across levels of analysis.Review of Higher Education 12(13): 265–278.
Zuckerman, H. (1977).Scientific Elite: Nobel Laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bentley, R., Blackburn, R. Changes in academic research performance over time: A study of institutional accumulative advantage. Res High Educ 31, 327–353 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992271
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992271