Abstract
Observers' perceptions of actors engaged in cross-sex and same-sex nonreciprocal touch vs. no-touch interactions were assessed. Touchers were rated significantly higher than recipients on dimensions of status/dominance, instrumentality/assertiveness, and warmth/expressiveness. Furthermore, touchers were rated higher, and recipients were rated lower, on these dimensions than no-touch controls. Female observers rated actors involved in touch interactions as more attractive than those involved in no-touch interactions, whereas male observers did the reverse. Results suggest that nonreciprocal touch conveys several messages, and appears to benefit the toucher more than the recipient. Implications of these results for evaluations of the nonverbal communication patterns of women and men were discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Reference Notes
Heslin, R. Steps toward a taxonomy of touching. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, May, 1974.
Major, B., & Williams, L. Frequency of touch by sex and race: A replication of some touching observations. Unpublished paper. State University of New York at Buffalo, 1980.
Alber, J. L. Tactile communication within dyads. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Purdue University, 1974.
References
Alagna, F. J., Whitcher, S. J., Fisher, J. D., & Wicas, E.A. Evaluative reactions to interpersonal touch in a counseling interview.Journal of Counseling Psychology 1979,26 465–472.
Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E. & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Sex role stereotypes: A current appraisal.Journal of Social Issues 1972,28 59–78.
Deaux, K. Sex differences. In T. Blass (Ed.),Personality variables in social behavior. Hillside, N. J.: Erlbaum, 1977.
Fisher, J. D., Rytting, M., & Heslin, R. Hands touching hands: Affective and evaluative effects of an interpersonal touch.Sociometry 1976,39 416–421.
Frank, L. K. Tactile communication.Genetic Psychology Monographs 1957,56 209–255.
Goffman, E.Interaction ritual. Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday, 1967.
Harlow, H. F. The nature of love.American Psychologist 1958,13 673–685.
Henley, N. M. Status and sex: Some touching observations.Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 1973,2 91–93.
Henley, N. M.Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
Heslin, R., & Boss, D. Nonverbal intimacy in airport arrival and departure.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1980,6 248–252.
Jourard, S. M. An exploratory study of body-accessibility.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 1966,5 221–231.
Jourard, S. M., & Friedman, R. Experimenter-subject “distance” and self disclosure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1970,15 278–282.
Jourard, S. M., & Rubin, J. E. Self disclosure and touching: A study of two modes of interpersonal encounter and their inter-relation.Journal of Humanistic Psychology 1968,8 39–48.
Kleinke, C. L., Meeker, F. B., & LaFong, C. Effects of gaze, touch, and use of name on evaluation of “engaged” couples.Journal of Research in Personality 1974,7 368–373.
Major, B. Gender patterns in touching behavior. In N. Henley & C. Mayo (Eds.),Gender, androgyny, and nonverbal behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1982.
Mehrabian, A.Nonverbal communication. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, 1972.
Montagu, A.Touching: The human significance of the skin. New York: Columbia University Press, 1971.
Nguyen, T. D., Heslin, R., & Nguyen, M. L. The meaning of touch: sex differences.Journal of Communications 1975,25 92–103.
Nguyen, M. L., Heslin, R., & Nguyen, T. D. The meaning of touch: Sex and marital status differences.Representative Research in Social Psychology 1976,7 13–18.
Pattison, J. E. Effects of touch on self-exploration and the therapeutic relationship.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1973,40 170–175.
Silverthorne, C. P., Noreen, C., Hunt, T., & Rota, L. The effects of tactile stimulation and visual experience.Journal of Social Psychology 1972,88 153–154.
Spitz, R. A. Hospitalism.The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 1946,2 113–117.
Summerhayes, D. L., & Suchner, R. W. Power implications of touch in male-female relationships.Sex Roles 1978,4 103–110.
Whitcher, S. L., & Fisher, J. D. Multidimensional reaction to therapeutic touch in a hospital setting.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979,37 87–96.
Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw Hill, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Major, B., Heslin, R. Perceptions of cross-sex and same-sex nonreciprocal touch: It is better to give than to receive. J Nonverbal Behav 6, 148–162 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987064
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987064