Abstract
Yield and composition of essential oils were compared in foliage, stems, and roots of ponderosa pine seedlings, and preferences for the trees by pocket gophers were determined. Test seedlings represented nine widely separated provenances in the western United States. Seed source of the trees influenced gopher feeding preferences and resulted in varied tree damage. The damage ranged from 0 to 31%, suggesting that some sources might possess sufficient natural resistance to give trees practical protection from gophers in the field. There were no morphological differences among sources to explain differential tree damage. All sources contained essential oils in all tissues examined, but oil yield varied among and within tissue types. Oils were predominantly (76–97%) composed of monoterpene hydrocarbons. Oil composition varied by source, and different tissue types varied greatly in the yield and composition of their oils. Neither yield nor constituents of foliage oils were significantly correlated with gopher damage (or preference). In contrast, some components of stem and root oils were strongly related to preference. Results of correlation and discriminant analyses showed that some oil constituents could serve as indicators of resistance (or susceptibility) to gopher damage. Such important chemical variables, when verified, could be used in selections for ponderosa pine resistant to gophers.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anthony, R. M., Barnes, V.G., Jr., andEvans, J. 1978. “Vexar” plastic netting to reduce pocket gopher depredation of conifer seedlings. 8th Vertebr. Pest. Conf. Proc. 1978:138–144.
Barnes, V.G., Jr., Martin, P., andTietjen, H.P. 1970. Pocket gopher control on Oregon ponderosa pine plantations.J. For. 68:433–435.
Crouch, G.L. 1969. Animal damage to conifers on national forests in the Pacific Northwest region. USDA For. Serv. Resour. Bull. PNW-28, 13 pp. Pac. Northwest For. and Range Exp. Stn., Portland, Oregon.
Crouch, G.L. 1971. Susceptibility of ponderosa, Jeffrey, and lodgepole pines to pocket gophers.Northwest Sci. 45:252–256.
Crouch, G.L. 1979. Atrazine improves survival and growth of ponderosa pine threatened by vegetative competition and pocket gophers.For. Sci. 25:99–111.
Crouch, W.E. 1933. Pocket gopher control. USDA Farmers Bull. 1709, 21 pp. Washington, D.C.
Cummins, E.B. 1975. Pocket gophers feeding preferences for ponderosa pine strains. Unpublished MS thesis, University of Idaho. Moscow. 51 pp.
Dingle, R.W. 1956. Pocket gophers as a cause of mortality in eastern Washington pine plantations.J. For. 54:832–835.
Dixon, W.J. (ed). 1977. BMD—Biomedical Computer Programs, 3rd ed., 773 pp. University of California Press, Berkeley.
Hermann, R.K., andThomas, H.A. 1963. Observations on the occurrence of pocket gophers in southern Oregon pine plantations.J. For. 61:527–529.
Moore, A. W. 1940. Wild animal damage to seed and seedlings on cutover Douglas-fir lands of Oregon and Washington. USDA Tech. Bull. 706, 28 pp. Washington, D.C.
Radwan, M.A. 1974. Natural resistance of plants to animals, pp. 85–94,in H.C. Black, (ed.). Wildlife and Forest Management in the Pacific Northwest Symposium Proceedings. Oregon State University Press, Corvallis.
Radwan, M.A., andCrouch, G.L. 1978. Selected chemical constituents and deer browsing preference of Douglas-fir.J. Chem. Ecol. 4:675–683.
Read, R. A. 1971. Browsing preference by jackrabbits in a ponderosa pine provenance plantation. USDA For. Serv. Res. Note RM-186, 4 pp. Rocky Mt. For. and Range Exp. Stn., Fort Collins, Colorado.
Snedecor, G.W. 1961. Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology, 534 pp. Iowa State University Press, Ames.
Squillace, A.E., andSilen, R.R. 1962. Racial variation in ponderosa pine.For. Sci. Monogr. 2:27 pp.
Tevis, L., Jr. 1956. Pocket gophers and seedlings of red fir.Ecology 37:379–381.
von Rudloff, E. 1975. Chemosystematic studies in the genusTsuga. Leaf and twig oil analysis of western hemlock.Can. J. Bot. 53:933–939.
Zavarin, E., Cobb, F.W., Jr., Bergot, J., andBarber, H.W. 1971. Variation ofPinns ponderosa needle oil with season and needle age.Phytochemistry 10:3107–3114.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The authors thank Dr. K. Hungerford, University of Idaho, for supervising the gopher preference test under a cooperative-aid agreement with the U.S.D.A. Forest Service.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Radwan, M.A., Crouch, G.L., Harrington, C.A. et al. Terpenes of ponderosa pine and feeding preferences by pocket gophers. J Chem Ecol 8, 241–253 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984020
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00984020