Abstract
The present study tested clinical hypotheses about the social processing attributes of paranoid personalities (PP). Eighteen PPs and 18 normal controls (NC) viewed standardized role plays (Dodge, 1986) in which a provocation occurred but the protagonist's intention varied (i.e., ambiguous, accidental, hostile, or prosocial). Subjects identified the intention behind the action and then chose a response to that action (e.g., “ignore what he did”). The results indicated that PPs and NCs did not differ on intentioncue detection when the intention was clear, but PPs had a significantly higher rate of misreading ambiguous situations. Furthermore, when intentions were ambiguous, PPs were more likely than NCs to identify them as hostile intentions. Finally, PPs' reactions to the vignettes were different from normal controls' when the perceived intention was either prosocial or accidential. PPs were more likely to respond with anger and less likely to ignore the event, compared to NCs. These data provide initial support for clinical notions about the aberrant social processing of paranoid personalities.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
American Psychiatric Association (1980).Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: APA.
American Psychiatric Association (1987).Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed., revised). Washington, DC: APA.
Cameron, N., & Rychlak, J. F. (1985).Personality development and psychopathology: A dynamic approach (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Derogatis, L. D. (1978).Symptom Checklist-90 Revised. Copyright: Author.
Dodge, K. A. (1986).Intention-Cue Videotapes and Manual. Nashville, TN: Author.
Lazare, A., Klerman, G. L., & Armor, D. J. (1970). Oral, obsessive and hysterical personality patterns.Journal of Psychiatric Research, 7, 275–290.
Millon, T. (1981).Disorder of personality DSM-II: Axis II. New York: Wiley.
Munro, A. (1982). Paranoia revisited.British Journal of Psychiatry, 141, 344–349.
Thompson-Pope, S. K., & Turkat, I. D. (1988). Reactions to ambiguous stimuli among paranoid personalities.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 10, 21–32.
Thompson-Pope, S. K., & Turkat, I. D. (1989). Paranoia about paranoid personality research.Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 50, 310.
Turkat, I. D. (1985). Formulation of paranoid personality disorder. In I. D. Turkat (Ed.),Behavioral case formulation (pp. 161–198). New York: Plenum.
Turkat, I. D., & Banks, D. S. (1987). Paranoid personality and its disorder.Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessments, 9, 295–304.
Walker, J. I., & Brodie, H. K. H. (1985). Paranoid disorders. In H. I. Kaplan & B. J. Sadock (Eds.),Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry—IV (pp. 747–755). Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.
Watson, D., & Friend, R. (1969). Measurement of social evaluation anxiety.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 43, 384–395.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turkat, I.D., Keane, S.P. & Thompson-Pope, S.K. Social processing errors among paranoid personalities. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 12, 263–269 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960623
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960623