Abstract
New technologies available in the field of medical genetics have increased the importance of responsible ethical decision-making among genetic counselors. A 1985 national survey of M.D. and Ph.D. genetic counselors assessed ethical attitudes using case scenarios designed to simulate dilemmas faced in genetic counseling (Wertz and Fletcher, 1988b). The current study focuses on attitudes of M.S. genetic counselors using similar scenarios, allowing for effective comparisons. M.S. counselors were more willing than M.D. and Ph.D. counselors to maintain patient confidentiality when screening for Huntington's Disease and occupational diseases, and a greater number would agree to counsel patients pursuing prenatal testing for sex selection. A majority of M.S. counselors would disclose an XY karyotype to a phenotypically female patient. M.S. counselors reasoned that respect for patient autonomy and patient confidentiality justified their decisions in many cases. The importance of these principles is discussed and questioned.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Childress JF (1990) The place of autonomy in bioethics.Hastings Cent Rep 20(1):12–17.
Fletcher JC, Berg K, Tranoy KE (1985) Ethical aspects of medical genetics.Clin Genet 27:199–205.
Sorenson JR, Swazey JP, Scotch NA (1981)Reproductive Pasts, Reproductive Futures: Genetic Counseling and Its Effectiveness. Birth Defects: Original Article Series (Vol. XVII, No. 4). Alan R Liss, pp 1–14, 37–44.
Wertz DC Fletcher JC (1988a) Attitudes of genetic counselors: A multinational survey.Am J Hum Genet 42:592–600.
Wertz DC Fletcher JC (1988b) Ethics and medical genetics in the United States: A national survey.Am J Med Genet 29:815–827.
Wertz DC, Fletcher JC (1989) Moral reasoning among medical geneticists in eighteen nations.Theoret Med 10(2):123–138.
Yarborough M, Scott JA, Dixon LK (1989) The role of beneficence in clinical genetics: Non-directive counseling reconsidered.Theoret Med 10(2):139–149.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pencarinha, D.F., Bell, N.K., Edwards, J.G. et al. Ethical issues in genetic counseling: A comparison of M.S. counselor and medical geneticist perspectives. J Genet Counsel 1, 19–30 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960081
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00960081