Abstract
Moral dissensus is a distinct feature of our time. This is not only true of our post-modern culture in general, but also of business culture specifically. In this paper I start by explaining how modernist rationality has produced moral dissensus without offering any hope of bringing an end to it in the foreseeable future. Opting for a form of post-modernist rationality as the only viable way of dealing with moral dissensus, I then make an analysis of a number of ways proposed by both specialists in the field of business ethics, as well as philosophers to deal with moral decision-making in this situation of moral dissensus. The conclusion reached is that none of these attempts succeeds in coming to terms with moral dissensus. I then formulate an alternative approach to moral decision-making which I call: “Rational interaction for moral sensitivity”. After explaining this approach, I defend it against some of the most obvious objections that might be raised against it in a business environment.
When you're talking birth control, what blocks it and freezes it out is that it's not a matter of more or fewer babies being argued. That's just on the surface. What's underneath is a conflict of faith, of faith in empirical social planning versus faith in the authority of God as revealed by the teachings of the Catholic Church. You can prove the practicality of planned parenthood till you get tired of listening to yourself and it's going to get nowhere because your antagonist isn't buying the assumption that anything socially practical is good per se. Goodness for him has other sources which he values as much as or more than social practicality. (Robert M. Pirsig, Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance.)
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ayer, A. J.: 1985, ‘Emotivism’, in M. Velasquezet al. (eds.),Ethics: Theory and Practise (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.), pp. 20–22.
Burrel, D. and S. Hauerwas: 1981, ‘From System to Story: an Alternative Pattern for Rationality in Ethics’, in D. Callahan and H. T. Engelhardt (eds.),The Roots of Ethics (Plenum Press, New York), pp. 75–116.
Cahoone, L. E.: 1988,The Dilemma of Modernity (State University of New York Press, Albany, N.Y.).
Davison, D. P.: 1976,Rationality in the Age of Science: Habermas' Critique and Replacement of Positivist Rationality (UMI, London).
Esterhuyse W. P.: 1991,Sake-etiek in Die Praktyk (J L van Schaik, Pretoria).
Fekete, J.: 1988,Life after Post-modernism (Macmillan Education, London).
Griffioen, S.: 1991, ‘The Metaphor of the Covenant in Habermas’,Faith and Philosophy 8(4), 524–540.
Henderson, V. E.: 1990, ‘The Ethical Side of Enterprise’, in W. M. Hoffman and J. Moore (eds.),Business Ethics (McGraw-Hill, New York), pp. 69–78.
Hoffman, W. M. and J. M. Moore: 1990,Business Ethics (McGraw-Hill, New York).
Jonas, H.: 1981, ‘The Concept of Responsibility: An Inquiry into the Foundations of an Ethics for Our Age’, in D. Callahan, D. Callahan and H. T. Engelhardt (eds.),The Roots of Ethics (Plenum Press, New York), pp. 45–74.
Lyotard, J.: 1989,The Postmodern Condition (Manchester University Press, Manchester).
MacIntyre, A.: 1981,After Virtue (Duckworth, London).
MacIntyre, A.: 1981b, ‘A Crisis in Moral Philosophy: Why is the Search for the Foundations of Ethics so Frustrating?’, in D. Callahan and H. T. Engelhardt (eds.),The Roots of Ethics (Plenum Press, New York), pp. 3–20.
Nash, L. L.: 1990, ‘Ethics Without the Sermon’, in W. M. Hoffman and J. M. Moore (eds.),Business Ethics (McGraw-Hill, New York), pp. 79–90.
Pirsig R. M.: 1984,Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance (Bantam Books, New York).
Rouse, J.: 1991, ‘The Politics of Postmodern Philosophy of Science’,Philosophy of Science 58(4), 607–627.
Smith, B. H.: 1988, ‘Value Without Truth-Value’, in J. Fekete (ed.),Life After Post-modernism (Macmillan Education, London), pp. 1–21.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Dr. Gedeon J. Rossouw is associate professor in Philosophy and Business Ethics at the Rand Afrikaans University in Johannesburg, South Africa. He is also involved in training and consultation on moral business culture for a number of South African corporations. His book:Business Ethics: made in South Africa is due to be published in the second half of 1993.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rossouw, G.J. Rational interaction for moral sensitivity: A postmodern approach to moral decision-making in business. J Bus Ethics 13, 11–20 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877150
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877150