Abstract
The safety of a new continuous cardiac output monitoring system, recently introduced by Baxter Healthcare Corporation's Edwards Critical-Care Division, was evaluated in normal sheep. The study compared the biocompatibility and safety of the Vigilance® CCO Monitoring System, which employs a continuous cardiac output (CCO) catheter with Baxter Edwards' standard Paceport™ pulmonary artery catheter.
The CCO catheter, which monitors hemodynamic pressures and provides continuons measurement of cardiac output based on the thermodilution principle, contains a thermal filament that is powered and controlled by a unique cardiac output monitor. Parameters were measured periodically in conscious animals and complete necropsies were performed alter each study. Time Control, Paceport™, and four CCO groups were studied. Selected groups were studied for 3 days (acute), 7 days (subacute), and/or 4 weeks after 3 days of continuons use (recovery).
Results showed no significant differences between the CCO and Paceport™ catheters in any of the parameters studied. On gross pathology, observations were similar. The only difference between catheters were microscopie findings of focal subendothelial or subendocardial changes correlated with areas that could have corne into contact with the CCO catheter. In acute groups, these changes consisted of a localized myofiber degeneration or necrosis, while in subacute and recovery groups, consisted only of fibrosis. None of the changes were clinically significant.
Thus, the CCO catheter, used in conjunction with the Vigilance® CCO Monitoring System, appears to pose no additional risk over a standard Paceport™ catheter in normal sheep after continuons use for up to 7 days.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Yelderman ML, Ramsay MA, Quinn MD, Paulsen AW, McKown RC, Gillman PH. Continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurement in ICU patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1992; 6: 270–274
Khalil H. Determination of cardiac output in man by a new method based on thermodilution. Lancet 1963; 1: 1352–1354
Barankay T, Jansco SN, Petri G. Cardiac output estimation by a thermodilution method involving intravascular heating and thermistor recording. Acta Physiologica Academiae Scientiarium Hungaricae 1970; 38 (2–3): 167–173
Philip JH, Long MC, Quinn MD, Newbower RS. Continuous thermal measurement of cardiac output. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1984; 31 (5): 393–400
Normann RA, Johnson RW, Messinger JE, Sohrab B. A continuous cardiac output computer based on thermodilution principles. Ann Biomed Eng 1989; 17: 61–73
Gilbert HC, Vender JS, Meyers P. Evaluation of continuous cardiac output in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: A472
Davis R, Sakuma R. Comparison of semi-continuous thermodilution to intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output determination. Anesthesiology 1992; 77: A473
SASR Procedures Guide. Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc, 1990
SAS/STATR User's Guide. Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc, 1989
Huang SKS, Graham AR, Lee MA, Ring ME, Gorman GD, Schiffman R. Comparison of catheter ablation using radiofrequency versus direct current energy: Biophysical, electrophysical and pathologie observations. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 18: 1091–1097
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lichtenthal, P.R., Gordan, D. Testing the safety of baxter continuous cardiac output monitoring system. J Clin Monitor Comput 12, 243–249 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857646
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00857646