Abstract
What are species? One popular answer is that species are individuals. Here I develop another approach to thinking about species, an approach based on the notion of a lineage. A lineage is a sequence of reproducing entities, individuated in terms of its components. I argue that one can conceive of species as groups of lineages, either organism lineages or population lineages. Conceiving of species as groups of lineages resolves the problems that the individual conception of species is supposed to resolve. It has added the virtue of focusing attention on the characteristic of species that is most relevant to understanding their role in evolutionary processes, namely, the lineage structure of species.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Buss, L.W.: 1987,The Evolution of Individuality, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Dawkins, R.: 1982,The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Ehrlich, P.R. and Raven, P.H.: 1969, ‘Differentiation of Populations’,Science 165, 1228–1231.
Eldredge, N.: 1985,Unfinished Synthesis: Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Ereshefsky, M.: 1991, ‘Species, Higher Taxa, and the Units of Evolution’,Philosophy of Science 58, 84–101.
Ghiselin, M.T.: 1974, ‘A Radical Solution to the Species Problem’,Systematic Zoology 23, 536–544.
Ghiselin, M.T.: 1987, ‘Species Concepts, Individuality, and Objectivity’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 127–143.
Gordon, R.E.: 1978, ‘A Species Definition’,International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 28, 605–607.
Holsinger, K.E.: 1987, ‘Discussion: Pluralism and Species Concepts, or When Must We Agree with One Another?’,Philosophy of Science 54, 480–485.
Hull, D.L.: 1976, ‘Are Species Really Individuals?’,Systematic Zoology 25, 174–191.
Hull, D.L.: 1978, ‘A Matter of Individuality’,Philosophy of Science 45, 335–360.
Hull, D.L.: 1980, ‘Individuality and Selection’,Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11, 311–332.
Hull, D.L.: 1981, ‘Units of Evolution: A Metaphysical Essay’, in R.N. Brandon and R.M. Burian (eds.),Genes, Organisms, Populations: Controversies over the Units of Selection, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 142–160.
Hull, D.L.: 1987 ‘Genealogical Actors in Ecological Roles’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 168–184.
Kitcher, P.: 1984, ‘Species’,Philosophy of Science 51, 308–333.
Kitcher, P.: 1987, ‘Ghostly Whispers: Mayr, Ghiselin, and the “Philosophers” on the Ontological Status of Species’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 184–192.
Mishler, B.D.: 1985, ‘The Morphological, Developmental, and Phylogenetic Basis of Species Concepts in Bryophytes’,Bryologist 88, 207–214.
Mishler, B.D. and Brandon, R.N.: 1987, ‘Individuality, Pluralism, and the Phylogenetic Species Concept’,Biology and Philosophy 2, 397–414.
Mishler, B.D. and Donoghue, M.J.: 1982, ‘Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism’,Systematic Zoology 31, 491–503.
Sober, E.: 1988,Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Thompson, P.: 1989,The Structure of Biological Theory, SUNY-Albany Press, Albany, NY.
Van Valen, L.M.: 1976, ‘Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks’,Taxon 25, 233–239.
Wiley, E.O.: 1978, ‘The Evolutionary Species Concept Reconsidered’,Systematic Zoology 27, 17–27.
Wilkinson, M.: 1990, ‘A Commentary on Ridley's Cladistic Solution to the Species Problem’,Biology and Philosophy 5, 433–446.
Williams, M.B.: 1970, ‘Deducing the Consequences of Evolution’,Journal of Theoretical Biology 29, 343–385.
Williams, M.B.: 1985, ‘Species are Individuals: Theoretical Foundations for the Claim’,Philosophy of Science 52, 578–590.
Wilson, B.E.: 1991, ‘Are Species Sets?’,Biology and Philosophy 6, 413–431.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, B.E. A (not-so-radical) solution to the species problem. Biol Philos 10, 339–356 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00852472
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00852472