Abstract
The International Commission on Radiological Protection has recently recommended a supplementary dose limit of 2 mSv to the abdominal surface of a pregnant member of staff in order to provide protection to her fetus comparable to that in members of the public, whose annual limit is recommended to be 1 mSv. In order to determine whether this apparent attenuation factor of 50% is appropriate for nursing and imaging staff exposed to nuclear medicine patients, estimates were made of the ratios of the maternal abdominal surface to fetal dose appropriately weighted for time, distance and dose rate. Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD) measurements were made at various depths in an anthropomorphic phantom irradiated at different distances by a distributed source of either technetium-99m or iodine-131 in order to determine the corresponding attenuation factors at the average fetal midline depth. Dose estimates were based on these factors and on published values of dose rate and exposure times for nursing and imaging staff at these distances from the patient. Fetal doses to nursing staff caring for an adult99mTc patient were estimated to vary from 86 μSv to 1.6 μSv, with the corresponding ratio of the abdominal surface to fetal dose varying from about 1.8:1 to 1.5:1 as the patient became less dependent on nursing care and the mean distance from the patient increased. Fetal doses to imaging staff varied from 1.12 μSv to 0.17 μSv for three types of99mTc scan, but the ratio only varied from 1.4:1 to 1.3:1. Fetal doses to imaging staff were estimated to be 6.7 μSv and 9.0 μSv for a whole-body scan of a thyroid cancer patient after 1311 ablation and therapy respectively, and the ratio was 1.3:1 for both types of scan. It was concluded that for a pregnant ward nurse or imaging technologist exposed to an adult or paediatric patient administered99mTc or131I, a dose limit of 1.3 mSv to the maternal abdominal surface will restrict their fetal dose to 1 mSv. A pregnant imaging technologist should perform no more than six adult99mTc studies or one131I whole-body scan per day, and may have to wear a more sensitive personal dosimeter than a film badge.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
International Commission on Radiological Protection. 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection.Annals of the ICRP vol 21, no 1-3,ICRP publication 60. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1991.
Faulkner K, Marshall NW. Personal monitoring of pregnant staff in diagnostic radiology.J Radiol Prot 1993; 13: 259–265.
National Radiological Protection Board. Occupational, public and medical exposure.Documents of the NRPB vol 4, no 2. London: HMSO, 1993.
Harding LK, Mostafa AB, Thomson WH. Staff radiation doses associated with nuclear medicine procedures — a review of some recent measurements.Nucl Med Commun 1990; 11: 271–277.
Mountford PJ, O'Doherty MJ, Harding LK, Thomson WH, Carter NJ, Bray D, Paul C, Batchelor S. Radiation dose rates from paediatric patients undergoing99Tcm investigations.Nucl Med Commun 1991; 12: 709–718.
Mountford PJ, O'Doherty MJ, Forge NI, Jeffries A, Coakley AJ. Radiation dose rates from adult patients undergoing nuclear medicine investigations.Nucl Med Commun 1991; 12: 767–777.
Harding LK, Mostafa AB, Roden L, Williams N. Dose rates from patients having nuclear medicine investigations.Nucl Med Commun 1985; 6: 191–194.
Harding LK, Tan CP, Conroy J, Thomson WH. The radiation dose to ward nurses from patients having nuclear medicine investigations.Nuklearmedizin 1986; 22(Suppl): 46–48.
Harding LK, Al-Haider Z, Clarke EA, Thomson WH. Radiation exposure to nuclear medicine staff.Nuklearmedizin 1987; 23(Suppl): 382–384.
Shrimpton PC, Wall BF, Fisher ES. The tissue-equivalence of the Alderson Rando anthropomorphic phantom for x-rays of diagnostic qualities.Phys Med Biol 1981; 26: 133–139.
Ragozzino MW, Breckle R, Hill LM, Gray JE. Average fetal depth in utero: data for estimation of fetal absorbed radiation dose.Med Phys 1986; 158: 513–515.
Mountford PJ, Green S, Jones K, Bradley DA. Variation of relative dose rate with distance from extended sources of99Tcm.J Radiol Prot (in press).
McKinlay AF. Thermoluminescence dosimetry.Medical Physics Handbooks 5. Bristol: Adam Hilger, 1981.
Godden TJ. Therapeutic uses of unsealed radionuclides. In: Goldstone KE, Jackson PC, Myers MJ, Simpson AE, eds.Radiation protection in nuclear medicine and pathology. Report No. 63. York: Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine; 1991: 13–34.
Clarke LP, Cullom SJ, Shaw R, Reece C, Penney BC, King MA, Silbiger M. Bremsstrahlung imaging using the gamma camera: factors affecting attenuation.J Nucl Med 1992; 3: 161–166.
Bayouth JE, Macey DJ. Quantitative imaging of holmium-166 with an Anger camera.Phys Med Biol 1994; 39: 265–279.
Briesmeister J. MCNP — a general Monte Carlo code for neutron and photon transport — version 3(a).LA-7396-M Revision 2. Los Alamos, New Mexico: Los Alamos National Laboratory, 1986.
Clarke EA, Thomson WH, Notghi A, Harding LK. Radiation doses from nuclear medicine patients to an imaging technologist: relation to ICRP recommendations for pregnant workers.Nucl Med Commun 1992; 13: 795–798.
Askienazy S. The practice of nuclear medicine in Common Market countries.Semin Nucl Med 1993; XXIII: 67–72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mountford, P.J., Steele, H.R. Fetal dose estimates and the ICRP abdominal dose limit for occupational exposure of pregnant staff to technetium-99m and iodine-131 patients. Eur J Nucl Med 22, 1173–1179 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00800600
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00800600