Summary
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) as a means of regulating the intensity of exercise during running. The subjects were healthy, relatively fit young adults (16 men and 12 women). Estimates of effort were recorded using the Borg 6–20 Scale whilst the maximal oxygen uptake of the subjects was measured as they ran on an electrically driven treadmill. In a further session, the same subjects were requested to run on the treadmill at constant exercise intensity based on their interpretation of levels 9, 13 and 17 of the Borg Scale. They regulated their running speed and the treadmill gradient but had no knowledge of performance from the equipment display panel. A linear regression analysis was carried out to examine the relationship between heart rate, perceived exertion and relative metabolic demand. This revealed that the rating of perceived exertion was at least as good a predictor of exercise intensity as heart rate in both the graded exercise test and effort production test. The results support the view that RPE may be used to predict relative metabolic demand, especially at higher workloads and could be a useful medium for controlling intensity of effort during vigorous exercise in such subjects.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
American College of Sports Medicine (1986) Guidelines for graded exercise testing and prescription. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia
Borg GAV (1977) Physical Work and Effort. Pergamon Press, Oxford
Borg GAV, Linderholm H (1970) Exercise performance and perceived exertion in patients with coronary insufficiency, arterial hypertension and vasoregulatory asthesia. Acta Med Scand 187:7–26
Carton RL, Rhodes EC (1985) A critical review of the literature on ratings scales for perceived exertion. Sports Med 2:198–222
Morgan WP (1981) Psychophysiology of self-awareness during vigorous physical activity. Res Quart Exerc Sport 52:385–427
Noble BJ (1982) Clinical applications of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 14:406–411
Noble BJ, Maresh CM, Ritchey M (1981) Comparison of exercise sensations between females and males. In: Borms J, Hebbelinck M, Venerando A (eds) Women and sport. S Karger, Basel, pp 175–179
Pandolf KB (1983) Advances in the study and application of perceived exertion. In: Terjung R (ed) Exercise and sports science reviews. 11 Academic Press, New York, pp 118–158
Purvis JW, Cureton KWJ (1981) Ratings of perceived exertion at the anaerobic threshold. Ergonomics 24:295–300
Smutok MA, Skrinar GS, Pandolf KB (1980) Subjective regulation by perceived exertion. Arch Physic Med Rehab 61:569–574
Thoden JS, Wilson BA, MacDougall JD (1985) Testing aerobic power. In: MacDougall JD, Wenger HA, Green HJ (eds) Physiological testing of the elite athlete. Canadian Association of Sports Sciences, Winsor Ontario, pp 39–60
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eston, R.G., Davies, B.L. & Williams, J.G. Use of perceived effort ratings to control exercise intensity in young healthy adults. Europ. J. Appl. Physiol. 56, 222–224 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00640648
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00640648