Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cooper, R. and T. Parsons: 1976, ‘Montague Grammar, Generative Semantics, and Interpretive Semantics’, in B. H. Partee (ed.),Montague Grammar, Academic Press, New York, pp. 311–362.
Guenthner, F.: 1987, ‘Linguistic Meaning in Discourse Representation Theory’,Synthese.
Heim, L: 1982,The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts. Distributed by Graduate Linguistic Student Association.
Janssen, T. M. V.: 1983,Foundations and Applications of Montague Grammar, Ph.D. thesis, Mathematisch Centrum.
Kamp, H.: 1981, ‘Evénements, Représentations Discursives et Référence Temporelle’,Languages 64, 39–64.
Kamp, H.: 1981, ‘A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation’, in J. A. G. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen, and M. B. J. Stokhof (eds.),Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Centre Tracts, Amsterdam, Volume 136, pp. 277–322.
Kamp, H. and C. Rohrer: 1983, ‘Tense in Texts’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.),Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 250–269.
Kamp, H.: 1984–1985, ‘Context, Thought and Communication’,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society LXXXV, 239–261.
Montague, R.: 1970, ‘Universal Grammar’,Theoria 36, 373–398. Reprinted in R. H. Thomason (ed.), (1974),Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn, pp. 222–246.
Montague, R.: 1973, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in J. Hintikka, J. M. E. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes (eds.),Approaches to Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht. Reprinted in R. H. Thomason (ed.), 1974,Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn, pp. 247–270.
Pollard, C. J.: 1985,Lectures on HPSG, unpublished lecture notes, CSLI, Stanford University.
Reyle, U.: 1985, ‘Grammatical Functions, Discourse Referents and Quantification’, inProceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Ca., August 18–23, 1985, pp. 829–831.
van Eijek, J.: 1985,Aspects of Quantification in Natural Language, Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen, unpublished Ph.D. thesis.
Zeevat, H.: 1987, ’A Treatment of Belief Sentences in Discourse Representation Theory’, in M. Stokhof and J. Groenendijk (eds.),Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalised Quantifiers, Foris Publications, Dordrecht.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zeevat, H. A compositional approach to discourse representation theory. Linguist Philos 12, 95–131 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627399
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627399